1Semana·

Pyramized investment reserve and the Do-It-Yourself-Leveraged-Getto-ACWI

Foreword:


An investment reserve can be a great thing, it smoothes out volatility and in extreme phases you have the opportunity to implement something meaningful in your portfolio, which has a very calming effect psychologically.


Unfortunately, the expected additional return from buy the dip often fails to materialize, as the opportunity costs eat everything up again.

Very nicely described here by Gerd Kommer:

https://gerd-kommer.de/buy-the-dip/


But what if we turn a few screws, don't hold our investment reserves in cash and buy leveraged?


I have thought too much about this topic and built a model for a war chest, which I am also implementing myself.


Building up the reserve:


Investment Reserve

-------------------------------------------

EURO

10.0% Money Market / 0-1y Bonds EUR $CSH2 (+0,01%)

10.0% Inflation linked Gov. Bonds $IBCI (+0,01%)

10.0% German Gov. Bonds 7+Y $X03G (+0,01%)

-------------------------------------30%

US Dollar

10.0% Money Market / 0-1y Bonds USD $XFFE (+0,01%)

10.0% Inflation linked Gov. Bonds $XTIP (+0,01%)

10.0% US Gov. Bonds 7-10Y $US7 (+0,01%)

-------------------------------------30%

Swiss Franc

20.0% Swiss Gov.Bonds 7-10Y $CH0440081393 (+0,31%)

-------------------------------------20%

Swiss Gold

20.0% Gold $EWG2 (-1,14%)

-------------------------------------20%

==========100%==========


The reserve must be structured in such a way that it is not torn apart in a crisis. In the best-case scenario, parts of the reserve should even rise during crises.

This is why part of it consists of government bonds; in economic crises, interest rates are generally lowered, which is why long-term bonds should rise. Currency crises are also conceivable, which is why we diversify across currencies. (EUR / USD and CHF)

As inflationary phases can certainly occur, I have decided to include inflation-indexed government bonds and gold.

The total of 4% in money market funds exists in order to have a volatility-free position.


This reserve is not a standalone, it should be seen as part of a global portfolio and can make up between 10% and 30% of the total portfolio.

It is not intended to generate returns, but merely to compensate for inflation and to remain stable in value during crises.


The strategy:


As an anchor point we use the all-time high of the $ACWI (USD) from -10% we invest step by step. We try to buy the ACWI with increasing leverage. As there is no 2x ACWI, FTSE All-World, MSCI World or similar, we have to build our own as best we can. I don't want to use certificates because they have a counterparty risk. That's why I only use ETFs and ETCs.


Mode 1 ACWI -10% - Lev. 1.25x - Correction


5.00% MSCI USA 2X Lev. $CL2 (-0,65%)

11.0% World ex USA $EXUS (+0,91%)

4.0% Emerging Markets $EIMI (-0,16%)

-------------------------------------20%


Mode 2 ACWI -20% - 1.82x Lev - Crisis


12.0% MSCI USA 2X Lev. $CL2 (-0,65%)

6.8% Euro Stoxx 50 2X Lev. $LVE (+1,45%)

1.7% FTSE 100 2X Lev. $LUK2

4.5% Japan $PRAJ (+0,3%)

-------------------------------------25%


Mode 3 ACWI -30% - 2.35x Lev - Escalation I


12.0% MSCI USA 2X Lev. $CL2 (-0,65%)

4.8% Euro Stoxx 50 2X Lev. $LVE (+1,45%)

1.2% FTSE 100 2X Lev. $LUK2

9.5% Total World 3X Lev.$3VTE

-------------------------------------27,5%


Mode 4 ACWI- 40% - 3x Lev. - Escalation II


27.5% Total World 3X Lev. $3VTE

-------------------------------------27,5%

==========100%==========


Rebalancing


After the crash is before the crash, the investment reserve must be replenished.

After the price has recovered a distance of approx. 60% from the low to the top (ACWI), I would recommend selling all Total World 3X Lev. positions and thus filling the reserve.

The rest of the reserve can then be filled with your savings rates and partial sales of the 2x positions.


Since we do not put the return from this "trade" completely back into the bond, but keep a part of the "Do-It-Yourself-Leveraged-Getto-ACWI", we build up a small leverage over time, at favorable conditions.


Problems and risks:


Especially if it goes down further than 50%, things can get ugly.

In the 2019 financial crisis, for example, we would have made -58%. As a result, the recovery would have taken 1 year longer than if we had bought a normal ACWI. However, in all other corrections (including Corona), we would have come out of the crisis better with this strategy and would have generated an annual outperformance of 1-2% p.a. after tax (varies depending on the period).


In long bull markets, without significant corrections, this strategy underperforms. In sideways markets, we should outperform a 100% equity portfolio due to the interest income.


It is not entirely clear which part of the investment reserve will be sold first and which last. Depending on the nature of the crisis, some shares may rise and others may fall.

If it is a debt crisis, for example, it may not be wise to sell your gold right at the beginning. If it is an economic crisis, long-dated bonds are king, although inflation-linked bonds will probably suffer somewhat.

If you don't want to be caught on the wrong foot here, you can always sell 50% of the best-performing asset and 50% of the worst-performing asset at the same time.


Which wouldn't be a good thing if we had two cycles in quick succession before we had the opportunity to rebalance.


Colorful pictures:


I have recreated the period from 01.01.2018 to 01.01.2025 in ExtraETF.

Unfortunately, you can't currently share the portfolio there, which is why I've used a few screenshots here.

I chose this period because I am familiar with it and it had both negative and positive interest rates. In addition, there were a total of 3 drops of more than 10% and a bond crash.


Note during the negative interest rate phase, the portfolio held no bonds (except the inflation-indexed ones) and instead held negative interest cash.


Here you can see a

100% FTSE-All World $VWCE (-0,12%) vs

80% FTSE-All World + 20% investment reserve.

attachment

Maximum Drawdown VS FTSE-All World


Although we buy leveraged products, the maximum drawdown is lower, at least as long as it does not go lower than approx. 35%.

attachment

The meme for Sunday (even if it's not Sunday):

attachment

I have created an 80% FTSE All-World + 20% Reserve portfolio starting 01.01.2025 and will continue to maintain this, so everyone can see the real performance of this module. And of course I will update you when we are down 10%.


What do you think of the pyramized investment reserve and the Do-It-Yourself-Leveraged-Getto-ACWI?

9Posições
€ 101.446,42
1,45%
10
21 Comentários

imagem de perfil
Are you going to completely dismantle your existing multi-factor tinkering booth? I don't think I could. At most, I'm considering leaving new money in moderation at the moment.
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf by the way, I think your profile picture makes me sleep badly
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf No, don't worry. I still have my multifactor portfolio.
I just wanted to illustrate this form of investment reserve here. So that people aren't completely overwhelmed by it and you can easily compare the performance, I've created a demo account here with a FTSE All-World instead of a multifactor.

This reserve is also not new, it has always been part of my portfolio. However, I was never quite sure how it should be invested in times of crisis. After some back and forth, I have now settled on this variant.

Do you have any concerns about this?
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost hmm absolutely not. I wouldn't have found it so sensible to sell if some taxes had already been incurred. You could even take it a step further and riskier. If it primarily affects the USA, you could consider choosing a leveraged S&P. Then you could do what $WTEF does, only more intensively, i.e. with fluctuation of the investment reserve
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf I don't think the efficient core is so good, because even deep in the crisis you hold investment reserves. But maybe quite nice for more cautious people.
imagem de perfil
@SchlaubiSchlumpf What do the other nerds think of the idea of a bifurcated investment reserve?

@Epi @randomdude @Stullen-Portfolio

Have I forgotten anyone else?
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost oh yes, I'm not sure if the fork isn't a bit overkill. But it shouldn't cost much. And I'm not enough of a bond expert to say too much about it.
imagem de perfil
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost The topic of investment reserves reminds me of Beck's Global Portfolio One. For which finanzen-erklaert.de has shown that B&H was always superior from a holding period of 14 years.
Regardless of this, your asset allocation would be far too fragmented for me. And that - if I understood correctly - for 1-2% outperformance?
Sorry, but you asked for my opinion 🤷🏻‍♂️
2
imagem de perfil
@randomdude Thank you for your quick response.
The small size is indeed a problem.
However, I wanted to position the reserve as broadly as possible.
In practice, this is not a problem for me, as the size of my portfolio allows this without the transaction costs eating me up.
However, if the portfolio is not 6-digit and if each savings installment significantly increases the profile, then B&H is better. 😘
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost Forked bonds were supposed. Depending on the size of the investment reserve, it seems to me that there are many different assets for very little difference between the assets. So basically what @randomdude wrote.

You could also consider buying a 3x leverage of about 50% at -40%. But then of course you are in a new asset class as you described
1
Ver todas as 10 restantes respostas
Participar na conversa