2Ano·

Dear Community,

I would like to ask your opinion again after a little more than 6 months in the stock market.

- I save monthly the $VWRL (+0,84%) with 15% of my net salary from my employment relationship

- another 80% from my income from renting an apartment, end up in the $GOOD (+1,1%) or in the future in other rides

- 80% of my income from my secondary activities are invested in various other titles which are in my portfolio, alternately to keep the positions equally weighted.

In the future I would like to $SBUX (-1,76%) , $OHI (+2,31%) , $MC (+0,4%) , $HD (+0,75%) and $RIO (-0,45%) build up

My goal is to build a stability for the future with the ETF & build a monthly cash flow through the dividend stocks. (This is of course currently still reinvested).

I am very happy about criticism!

PS: The sales and partial sales are not correct here, which are only through the manual depot transfer arose and it was bought back to the sales value.

Vê o meu Painel agora!

2 Comentários

Simon@Simyer

2Ano

Don't you think that in the end your Reits are very overweighted? Personally, I would aim for a balanced ratio and not put so much into it. Currently and time and again, you can see that equities in particular like to fudge their balance sheets on the edge of legality, and as a shareholder you don't really know what the situation looks like. For me, that would be reason enough to focus a little more on diversification in the sectors. But that's just my opinion and can also be completely ignored 😁 Otherwise, I think it's often good to have a clear plan that you can always pursue, but also rebalance. So 👍🏻

•

Thomas@WienerGfrast

2Ano

@Simyer Thank you very much, you are probably right. Currently, the REITS are not yet so important. In a few years, however, they will most likely be weighted too high. Maybe I will then also look for 3 high dividended stocks instead of the REITS that pay differently to still get a high monthly cash flow. If I have 3 stocks here and they are from 3 different sectors, this issue would be at least a little more diversified. One must then just look at :)

•