1Semana·

Beginner's question, share sale

Can I also ask a beginner's question (as a safeguard)?

I bought 14 $PEP (-1,99%) all with a buy in of € 144 some time ago. As you know, the share then fell sharply (currently -20.43%), so it should be quite a long time before I am at least back to zero.

My loss pot is still pretty empty (I ended up here in June with a total of + 1.7%), so is there any point in selling everything now at €115 and then buying in again with the low buy in, would I then regularly top up again?

Thanks and best regards

3
23 Comentários

Maybe it will go up when you sell? Anything is possible.

Time in the market is better than timing the market... at least it hardly ever works for me...

If you are convinced of the store, stick with it, otherwise you better get out
11
imagem de perfil
1Semana
If you liked the share at € 144, you must be even happier today at € 114, aren't you? Because NOTHING has changed in the company itself in this short time.

Consider the reasons why you are buying at a certain price, also for your future purchases.

Timing the market doesn't work. You might as well try your luck at gambling.
7
Ver todas as 2 restantes respostas
imagem de perfil
My advice: keep Pepsi, the consumer goods stocks are always bad when everything rises & when everything falls, it is precisely these stocks that stabilize the portfolio + actually always pay safe dividends.
3
imagem de perfil
Regarding your question, sell and then buy again.
This is really only useful if you have already realized profits with shares (only shares) this year.

For example, if you have sold shares with a profit of €2000 (approx. €500 capital gains tax), you will receive a tax credit for the entire realized losses when you sell Pepsi (approx. €30 price loss x 14 shares).

Always bear in mind all the fees that are incurred.

My tax assumptions for your case: Germany, saver's lump sum of €1,000 exhausted, no other special tax features

You can optimize loss pots in this way. If you have several share positions, you can save a lot of tax if you sell some or all of your poorly performing positions.
3
Mostrar resposta
imagem de perfil
1Semana
Moin @Eurosammler If you sell everything at 115 now and fill your loss pot, the share will rise to 144 again in 6 months or whenever, you will pay tax on the 29 euros again, or it will be deducted from your loss pot. Do you realize what that does? Nothing... unless you want to fill the loss pot for another share you want to sell, but then the tax on the €29 remains when Pepsi is back at €144. Ergo... if you are still convinced of the company and it still fits into your own strategy, keep the share.
3
Ver todas as 4 restantes respostas
imagem de perfil
If you plan to sell something at a profit in the same year, it could pay off. However, if you only consider Pepsi, the new tax burden would also start earlier with the new lower cost price.
2
imagem de perfil
Yes, I would like to liquidate a $LU1681043599, I still have a $IE00B3YLTY66 and a $IE00B5BMR087 running.
Proceeds will be around €12,000, I'm still waiting for a market value of around €590 (I'm confident 😂).
imagem de perfil
@Eurosammler I'm not sure whether this applies to Germany or Austria, but in one or both countries, gains and losses from ETFs cannot be offset against those from shares.
1
imagem de perfil
@Iwamoto That's right, I hadn't thought of it, thank you! (Germany)
However, the loss pot is not only valid for one year, but remains in place until it has been fully offset. Otherwise correct: losses from shares can only be offset against gains from shares. ETFs and funds have their own pot. At least that's the rule in Germany.
2
imagem de perfil
@Baisse-Jumper Thanks for the information, I had read that somewhere before, but I didn't remember it.
So it's better to reserve the loss pot for the shares that you want to get rid of when you're heavily in the red?
@Eurosammler Let's put it this way: you can of course play around with the loss pot for shares. If you intend to sell a share at a profit and the FSA has already been used up or is not sufficient, for example, it is practical to be able to make use of the offsetting via the loss pot. I myself have deliberately sold shares in the red in order to increase the loss pot for offsetting future share gains.
1
imagem de perfil
@Baisse-Jumper In other words, it is an emergency solution if you have a stock corpse in your portfolio that you can no longer raise or you can use the proceeds for a new investment.
1
imagem de perfil
If the company is well positioned and you are still committed to it, I would buy more. Look at it this way, you get more shares in the company for the same money. If Black Friday or something else is on offer, you can also buy. Why not on the stock market?
2
imagem de perfil
@Alumdria I will also buy more and take the opportunity now. I would just like to get out of the red immediately via the loss-making pot so that I can achieve a growth return again, as I will definitely be feeding Pepsi for longer, if possible with dips.
1
imagem de perfil
No no noooooooo.... It's better to increase your purchase with 6 more, reduce your equity and look forward to dividends and if you're no longer convinced, just get out at plus 🥸 helloooooooooo this is PePsi 😋
Participar na conversa