But once again, you can't just refer to the traffic lights.
For example, Markus Söder alone spends ~€200,000 on photographers every year.
In comparison, just over €500,000 in make-up costs for an entire government and an entire legislative period seems almost humane to me...
For example, Markus Söder alone spends ~€200,000 on photographers every year.
In comparison, just over €500,000 in make-up costs for an entire government and an entire legislative period seems almost humane to me...
•
1414
•
@GuenDolf Doesn't Söder also pay for "his" museum with taxpayers' money?
••
@Staatsmann I didn't even know that until just now... But yes, apparently ~€230,000 per year... You can't make this stuff up...
•
11
•@GuenDolf It's almost princely when a democratically elected politician uses government spending for his own glory...
How big the outcry would be if Robert Habeck had had a statue erected of himself.
How big the outcry would be if Robert Habeck had had a statue erected of himself.
•
22
•@Staatsmann The BILD would write almost nothing else for a week 😂
•
22
•@GuenDolf WELT would organize a crisis summit for this and invite Elon Musk, Alice Weidel and probably Jens Spahn.
•
11
•
@Staatsmann "His" (?) museum?
••
@Staatsmann
Thanks, I can google it myself.
My question was more directed at "HIS" museum. You explicitly wrote "HIS" museum. Why is it "HIS" museum? Are portraits of Markus Söder exhibited there?
Of course, you don't mention that there was a committee of inquiry into the matter. That's a shame too.
Thanks, I can google it myself.
My question was more directed at "HIS" museum. You explicitly wrote "HIS" museum. Why is it "HIS" museum? Are portraits of Markus Söder exhibited there?
Of course, you don't mention that there was a committee of inquiry into the matter. That's a shame too.
••
@DusselDuck
I deliberately put the quotation marks in the comment.
It's not my job at this point to provide information about any committees of inquiry. I assume that people are capable of using Google themselves.
It is sarcastically referred to as "his" museum, as this museum is also very much a façade and has little real content.
Especially when you consider its political stance in the background, which is rather backward-looking and conservative.
A museum of the future for modern technologies is a very big self-irony.
If you then look at what is shown in the museum and compare this with his statements, it only gets funnier.
Add to that the mocking title "Foodblogger Markus Söder", who is the Prime Minister of Bavaria as a "side job".
I deliberately put the quotation marks in the comment.
It's not my job at this point to provide information about any committees of inquiry. I assume that people are capable of using Google themselves.
It is sarcastically referred to as "his" museum, as this museum is also very much a façade and has little real content.
Especially when you consider its political stance in the background, which is rather backward-looking and conservative.
A museum of the future for modern technologies is a very big self-irony.
If you then look at what is shown in the museum and compare this with his statements, it only gets funnier.
Add to that the mocking title "Foodblogger Markus Söder", who is the Prime Minister of Bavaria as a "side job".
••
@Staatsmann Allow me two questions:
1. you now write of "It" being sarcastically referred to as "his" museum? Who is "it"? (To be honest, I can't think of anyone other than you who has called it that so far)
2. how did you come up with the mocking title "Foodblogger Markus Söder" in this context? Where does this title appear?
1. you now write of "It" being sarcastically referred to as "his" museum? Who is "it"? (To be honest, I can't think of anyone other than you who has called it that so far)
2. how did you come up with the mocking title "Foodblogger Markus Söder" in this context? Where does this title appear?
••