2D·

SPD vs. shareholders, savers & Bitcoiners

37
41 Comentários

imagem de perfil
And @Techaktien wants to ride the wave of outrage a little longer to generate a few more clicks and followers.
44
Ver todas as 25 restantes respostas
imagem de perfil
The SPD will hopefully soon be in single figures. Then the problem will solve itself.
19
Ver todas as 7 restantes respostas
imagem de perfil
You know how it is, the ultra-rich can get away with it. The poor have too little money to fleece. So you have to get the money from the part of the population that can invest, but can't defend themselves like the ultra-rich.

So it's quite logical to want it that way.

But hey, it's not going to get any better, because we have X number of unemployed people and X number of boomer pensioners who cost a lot of money (see budget expenditure on labor and social welfare)
3
imagem de perfil
SCHMUUUUUTZ
2
Diggi, how cool is that please 😂👏🫡 I'm biting my tongue 😆
1
imagem de perfil
These are ultra-crass cutbacks, but the period 2020-2023 has shown that you can do anything with the citizens, they will go along with it
1
@rfid986 The worst period was 2005-2020: that's when everything was messed up.
imagem de perfil
Wealth tax at 75%!
@Vuu Absolutely! And anyone who earns more than €56,000 a year in Germany is rich. Because above this amount, you already pay the top tax rate, so you can also be considered rich.
This is plausible from the perspective of a member of the family-generational-hardworking class and its multi-millionaire nomenclature of Lafontaines and Wagenknechts!

https://www.zeit.de/1999/42/Sein_Herz_schlaegt_link
Participar na conversa