LoginSignup
Utilizador eliminado
1Ano
O comentário foi eliminado
Utilizador eliminado
1Ano
O comentário foi eliminado
Miguel R.@M1ch3
1Ano
Actually if you bought the 10 large caps in the US for the last 10 years, with rebalancing yearly you have 600% against 490% of Nasdaq 100.
•
1
•
imagem de perfil
VillaSpilla@VillaSpilla
1Ano
@M1ch3 YES, but this is a retrospective. If you do not know the future (what I suppose) I would go for a minimum diversification with the EQQQ.
••
Utilizador eliminado
1Ano
O comentário foi eliminado
Miguel R.@M1ch3
1Ano
••
Miguel R.@M1ch3
1Ano
@Performax But each year you need to rebalance your portfolio, and replace the underperforming with the other companies. it's the same as manage ETF. instead of the biggest 500 (sp500) it's the biggest 10 of each year. I have made a lot of simulations and it's quite appealing.
••
imagem de perfil
Carles@Carles
1Ano
@PowerWordChill $AMZN just a retailer/logistics provider…? Prime Video, and specially AWS with it’s cloud service, the app… if Amazon was just a retailer the valuation wouldn’t be so high, and it wouldn’t be affected so much every time it has good or bad news from it’s hard tech part of the business…

And $UBER is not a cab company, the value is the app and the capacity of getting comissions on it, they don’t own the cars nor employ the drivers (and now they’re also in delivery business with Uber Eats)…
••
Utilizador eliminado
1Ano
O comentário foi eliminado
imagem de perfil
Carles@Carles
1Ano
@PowerWordChill in any case, all this stocks tend to move in a similar direction, so I'd consider it not very much diversified investments...
••