•
11
•
4Mês
@TotallyLost Quite simply, index concepts such as the MSCI World Quality or WisdomTree (as if dividends automatically had anything to do with quality) simply don't deliver enough performance for me.
In the end, only one thing counts for me: that I have more assets in my portfolio after X years. That's why I only choose based on performance.
No, this S&P does not just reflect the classic "quality" factor, but focuses on high ROIC + positive free cash flow. Only companies that consistently generate positive cash flow over 10 years are included in the index.
From this perspective, it is clearly the superior strategy for me in every respect.
In the end, only one thing counts for me: that I have more assets in my portfolio after X years. That's why I only choose based on performance.
No, this S&P does not just reflect the classic "quality" factor, but focuses on high ROIC + positive free cash flow. Only companies that consistently generate positive cash flow over 10 years are included in the index.
From this perspective, it is clearly the superior strategy for me in every respect.
•
22
•@TechNav Another word for the quality factor is profitability.
ROIC, dividend growth, ESP growth, free cash flow... these are all included.
And it is generally assumed that 90% of returns can be explained by the 5-factor model.
Or how would you deduce that this product has done better.
I would say the answer is quality factor exposure.
But it's certainly an interesting product that I'll take a closer look at.
ROIC, dividend growth, ESP growth, free cash flow... these are all included.
And it is generally assumed that 90% of returns can be explained by the 5-factor model.
Or how would you deduce that this product has done better.
I would say the answer is quality factor exposure.
But it's certainly an interesting product that I'll take a closer look at.
•
22
•