1D·

New ATH

$BTC (+1,62%) is currently at a new all-time high. I just wanted to throw it in here.

25
22 Comentários

imagem de perfil
In US dollars. A Bitcoin remains a Bitcoin 😅
25
imagem de perfil
@Psychedelic_Sunflower BREAKING: Neues All Time Low des US Dollars🤪
18
imagem de perfil
@Psychedelic_Sunflower yes, the dollar is getting annoying 🙄
imagem de perfil
@Psychedelic_Sunflower And a dollar remains a dollar.
3
imagem de perfil
@Epi yes, many and more dollars remain a dollar 🤭
2
imagem de perfil
@Psychedelic_Sunflower Nope. Many more dollars remain many more dollars. A dollar always remains a dollar.
imagem de perfil
1
imagem de perfil
@Epi but there must be a concrete reason for such a sudden rise...who said anything? usually such jumps are mainly caused by the orange man lately
2
imagem de perfil
@lookingforinformation The reason for rising prices is always the same, there is more buying than selling volume.

And sometimes it is enough for one price to rise for others to come along and make the price rise even further... and so on and so forth.
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost I don't understand the argument, I never have.
How can there be more buying than selling volume if there has to be exactly one sale for every purchase? Both volumes are identical by definition. 🤔
imagem de perfil
@Epi ne the order books are not balanced, only the traded positions are.
If you have an order book with 1 seller and X buyers, then the buyer who is prepared to pay the highest price is served by a market tender.
And that is then the new price for the security.
1
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost Sure, but an order alone does not make a trading volume. If X people want to sell, but not at the current price, there are no sales.
Or am I wrong?
imagem de perfil
@Epi Correct.
But as a rule there are market makers who provide liquidity in such cases.
1
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost Doesn't the market maker then act as a counterparty? In other words, as a buyer when the book is full of sell orders? Even then, the balance would be maintained, wouldn't it?
imagem de perfil
@Epi Yes, when trading, there is always the same amount of selling as buying volume.

But if there is more buy volume than sell volume in the order book. Then the low volume acts as a kind of resistance and the high volume acts as a kind of attraction for the price.

After all, all orders have to be cleared so that the price can continue to move.

There are also (illegal) techniques such as spoofing where you can manipulate the price just by placing an order and thus sending a market signal without the intention of ever having this order filled.
1
imagem de perfil
@TotallyLost I have already understood this part. 😁

So the correct wording should actually be: There is more (near-price) sell order volume than buy order volume (ex spoofing).
I have no problem understanding it that way. 👍
1
Ver todas as 2 restantes respostas
imagem de perfil
Here's to more omega candles. :)
1
imagem de perfil
Every day a stupid one gets up .
imagem de perfil
Verkauf…
Participar na conversa