There are these and these years, otherwise your return has been very strong since the start, as long as you're on the ball. Small point of criticism:
why don't you sell this dirty $TGT and buy the more interesting $COST instead?
And instead of $UPS I would take $DHL, much better on the road and a diversification away from the USA
why don't you sell this dirty $TGT and buy the more interesting $COST instead?
And instead of $UPS I would take $DHL, much better on the road and a diversification away from the USA
••
2Mês
@Investingyoung Thank you! COST and DHL are great companies but my strategy is high initial dividend and reliable divi growth with FCF coverage. COST has (despite quality) only a very low current yield, TGT/UPS are undervalued in my opinion, not "dirt", and already pay attractively with solid coverage, especially TGT.
If COST has a historically high dividend yield to offer due to share price decline (although the company is still class), I will also get in. This is not the first time that these companies have been punished by the market.
If COST has a historically high dividend yield to offer due to share price decline (although the company is still class), I will also get in. This is not the first time that these companies have been punished by the market.
•
22
•@PoorDad no, target is really on the decline and no improvement in sight mmn.
Oops just stinks against DHL mmn.
But everyone as he wants and feels safe 🥂
Happy new year 🤠
Oops just stinks against DHL mmn.
But everyone as he wants and feels safe 🥂
Happy new year 🤠
••