Why the 120 euros at Palantir

Nobody · 2025-02-20T13:37:20.211909Z

$PLTR why the big sell-off at 120? I mean, why not at 50, 75, 100 whatever!? Anyone have any useful ideas?

4Mês

Remember one thing. The decisive factor is the dollar price. The euro doesn't matter at all. Because Palantir is traded in the USA

•

29

•

gui H.@useref748d772fc84f3e

4Mês

@Sansebastian Remember one thing: the question is still justified. Your comment is of little relevance.

•

1

•

Sansebastian@Sansebastian

4Mês

@useref748d772fc84f3e No, because the 120 EURO don't matter at all.

•

2

•

gui H.@useref748d772fc84f3e

4Mês

@Sansebastian 😁👌🏽

••

Rbbbbb@Rbbbbb

4Mês

Let me ask you how many of you are addicted to drugs

••

Rbbbbb@Rbbbbb

4Mês

@Sansebastian ki 🤖 is not aware of himself 🤣

••

TAHT@TAHT

4Mês

Because the valuation was absolutely absurd, and people decided to limit their risk and cash out.

•

7

•

Nobody@Nobody_123

4Mês

@TAHT i know, but the evaluation was already absurd before..

••

Null@Frei

4Mês

The trigger was probably defense spending to be cut in the USA

•

7

•

Nobody@Nobody_123

4Mês

@Frei 🤔 You're right, I hadn't thought of that. Possibly... I had something more like Fibonacci retracements in mind

••

MKR_@MKR_

4Mês

@Frei shouldn't the expenditure rather be partly "redirected"? in the direction of "specialization"? and palantir&co still has massive potential there - plus worldwide projects

•

1

•

Ferto@feribum

4Mês

Yes, the Pentagon should reallocate money, i.e. cut somewhere and use it elsewhere

•

1

•

Mike1990@Mike1990

4Mês

The boss wants to sell shares

•

4

•

Nobody@Nobody_123

4Mês

@Mike1990 I cannot disagree

•

1

•

Alexxela@Alexxela

4Mês

@Mike1990 yes, but he has actually corrected the sales plan so that he wants to sell less...

•

1

•

Mike1990@Mike1990

4Mês

@Alexxela yes, but he wants to sell, and the share has also performed very well

••

Alexxela@Alexxela

4Mês

@Mike1990 may be, but this is not news, as he already wanted to sell and was reported... the reason was in my opinion the Pentagon story and possibly short-seller in view of the valuation and the price increase in 2024 alone

•

2

•

V8-Bierturbo@V8-Bierturbo

4Mês

120>100>75>50 😘
Maximum profit taking and fear of a big drop

•

3

•

Nobody@Nobody_123

4Mês

@V8-Bierturbo sounds logical 👏😂

•

1

•

Erdbeermaus@Lumimyrsky

4Mês

had only corrected 25% at the beginning of January

•

2

•

Nobody@Nobody_123

4Mês

@Lumimyrsky You're right, but I'm interested in how this magic limit of 120 comes about

••

Erdbeermaus@Lumimyrsky

4Mês

@Nobody_123 pure coincidence

••

PMMVD@PMMVD

4Mês

Because the Us Gov. revised its plans … those plans that would have seen a lot of money going towards palantir.

•

2

•

Nobody@Nobody_123

4Mês

@PMMVD Maybe

••

Mo@BigMo

4Mês

Because the monthly chart is practically a vertical line.
Everything corrects at some point.

•

2

•

Nobody@Nobody_123

4Mês

@BigMo That's right, I'm just wondering why at this point in particular

••

Mo@BigMo

4Mês

@Nobody_123 It is enough if a larger investor, like many others here, thinks: "I'll take some profits".

There doesn't necessarily have to be another reason.

There has been a lot of fantasy in the share price for some time.

•

1

•

Nobody@Nobody_123

4Mês

@BigMo 🤔 maybe you're right... and it wasn't the amount at all, but a concatenation

••