1Semana·

Bitcoin treasury: The house of cards is collapsing - one in four companies worth less than their coins

Hello my dears,

I am not Dirk Müller, and I don't want to spread panic here. But I would still like to share this exciting report from the shareholder with you.

" Because I care about the community "


My dears, I myself invest directly in Bitcoin.

Or in companies that trade in it, like $COIN (+1,33%) coinbase, and $DEFI (-0,11%) Defi Technology.


The hype surrounding companies that fill their balance sheets with Bitcoin is starting to crack. A new analysis by K33 Research reveals an alarming development: every fourth listed company with significant Bitcoin reserves is now trading at a discount to its digital treasures on the stock exchange.


The core problem lies in the so-called "market-to-net asset value" (mNAV). If this value is less than one, the stock market value of a company is less than the pure value of the Bitcoin held. It becomes virtually impossible for these companies to raise fresh capital for further Bitcoin purchases. "If companies are trading below their net asset value, new share issues have a dilutive effect," explains Vetle Lunde, Head of Research at K33. In plain language: the company would issue more shares of ownership than it receives in value in the form of Bitcoin - a bad deal.


The crash at NAKA, a merger vehicle of KindlyMD and Nakamoto Holdings, is particularly dramatic. The share lost 96% from its record high, and the mNAV multiplier collapsed from an incredible 75 to just 0.7. But NAKA is not an isolated case. Prominent names such as the Tether-backed company Twenty One and Semler Scientific are now also trading below the value of their Bitcoin holdings.


Even industry leader MicroStrategy under pressure


Although the average mNAV multiple in the sector still appears high at 2.8, this picture is distorted. Smaller companies are increasingly under water, while only the largest players still have significant premiums. But even the industry's heavyweight, Michael Saylor's Strategy, is feeling the headwind. The premium on the value of Bitcoin has fallen to 1.26 - the lowest level since March 2024.


The consequence is already noticeable: the scope for MicroStrategy to finance new Bitcoin purchases via the stock market is shrinking. "This reduces MicroStrategy's ability to substantially acquire BTC and indicates much lower demand from one of the most important buyers of the past year," says Lunde. The numbers confirm this trend: so far in September, "Bitcoin treasurers" have been buying an average of just 1,428 BTC per day - the slowest pace since May.


Back to normality?


However, analysts like Lunde also see this development as a rational market correction. "Companies that act as pure accumulation vehicles for Bitcoin should not be traded at a premium to their balance sheet due to the cost of advisors, management and complex capital structures," he argues. The only exception is when the core operating business benefits directly from the high Bitcoin holdings.


For the Bitcoin price, this could mean that the market emancipates itself from the artificial demand from company balance sheets and returns to a more organic demand from ETFs and private investors.


https://www.deraktionaer.de/artikel/krypto/bitcoin-treasury-das-kartenhaus-bricht-zusammen-jede-vierte-firma-weniger-wert-als-ihre-coins-20386669.html

previw image
15
12 Comentários

imagem de perfil
Conversely, the headline could also read: "Bitcoin Treasury: 3 out of 4 companies worth more than their coins".

Well, it just depends on how you want to influence opinions.
5
imagem de perfil
@Bonus
Yes, of course.
I don't want to talk anyone out of investing here.
I just want to point out the risk of a bubble.
I personally have none of that.
But I like the people here in the community.
imagem de perfil
@Tenbagger2024 I've never understood why I should pay a premium for Strategy when I only want to hold Bitcoin. And the premium was sometimes really expensive. Legal entities can also invest in BTC directly without the detour. In fact, I tend to believe that the business case no longer works. However, it will be more interesting if the ratio slips below 1. Will stocks then be thrown onto the market to maintain liquidity? Will there then be a domino effect? Keyword leverage ...
1
imagem de perfil
@Tokugawa
Ratio <1 does not trigger sales, this only affects the share valuation.
1
imagem de perfil
@Savvy_investor_2000
Forced sales only occur when bonds mature and $MSTR has no cash, not when the market price is trading below NAV.
1
imagem de perfil
@Savvy_investor_2000
And as long as Bitcoin rises in the long term, the business model remains intact. A NAV discount is short-term market sentiment, not a break in the model.
1
imagem de perfil
No matter, I'll invest directly in BTC, which will continue to fly away in the long term anyway
2
imagem de perfil
It was clear to me from the start...

If $BTC really goes down over a longer period of time, the BTC treasury companies' business model will blow up in their faces.
2
It's totally crazy that companies are using bitcoins to polish up their broken business model on their balance sheets and people are still falling for it. So many noobs on the stock market, I can't believe it.
1
imagem de perfil
@user28461
For shareholders, $MSTR is a leveraged call option on Bitcoin. In fact, anyway. And that is the central business model and not a make-up for the old software business.
imagem de perfil
That's why you buy crypto directly... and preferably store it in a cold wallet...
1
imagem de perfil
@Aktien-Investor
BTC treasury companies are not a substitute for cold wallets, but deliberately structured leveraged call options on Bitcoin.

Crashes are factored in. $MSTR has convertible bond maturities well into the 2030s, extremely low interest rates and debt that simply disappears in an upswing through conversion.
A call option lives with fluctuations. The decisive factor is not that Bitcoin never falls, but that the long-term trend remains intact. For bondholders, the downside is limited to invested capital plus coupon. At least as long as $MSTR doesn't go bankrupt :)
For shareholders, the upside is just as leveraged. This is why the model remains attractive for institutional investors and also for equity holders who want to invest in Bitcoin with leverage.
2
Participar na conversa