2Ano·

If luxury stocks are a good inflation hedge then why is no one buying them?


How do you see it?


5
12 Comentários

imagem de perfil
No money because of inflation 🤷
10
I would have thought of luxury stocks eigl rather LVMH, Hermes, Kering, Hugo Boss... but in the ETF are almost only tech stocks🤔
2
imagem de perfil
@TimUppi and shell 🙈
@TheRealRapha 😅 Although with the new Applewatch prices we are really already in the luxury watch area😂.
1
imagem de perfil
@TimUppi I think they are entered incorrectly at GQ. According to Amundi it looks like this: RICHEMONT 8.25% LVMH MOET 8.18% TESLA 6.66% HERMES 6.35% ESTEE LAUDER 5.92% KERING 5.27% MERCEDES-BENZ 4.93% DIAGEO 3.96% PERNOD RICARD 3.90% NIKE 3.84%
3
imagem de perfil
@Kundenservice
This post is now a year old but the composition of the ETF is still wrong. Who is this supposed to help make decisions please?
imagem de perfil
@Jan_Drosch Synthetically replicating is the magic word. :) https://www.amundietf.de/de/professionell/products/equity/amundi-sp-global-luxury-ucits-etf-eur-c/lu1681048630 Look here: You have the index components and once the top 10 components. We map here the shares that are in reality, which is why both composition, as well as things like geography and Co differs from the index, because the ETF does not buy the index. If you want a composition like the index, you have to buy a physically replicating ETF.
1
imagem de perfil
No desire for withholding tax and sector ETFs 😅
2
imagem de perfil
Why should luxury stocks offer a better inflation hedge than others?
imagem de perfil
@MariusLeonhard because the rich don't care about the price, but they need the brands to impress their friends who are also rich. The rich also don't run out of money like the normal people ... That's why luxury goods manufacturers have price-setting power 😉
imagem de perfil
Got LVMH, that's enough for me
imagem de perfil
Everyone buys them, especially LVMH good safe haven in the portfolio. They simply raise prices and buy anyway.
Participar na conversa