What kind of garbage is ICP? Never heard of it, but the chart on Max View says it all...
•
22
•
@Ph1l1pp...you can discuss anything, but your comment confirms twice that you are not an informed investor.
•
22
•@MrBlueSky you are apparently a shitcoin investor, but go for it ✌🏼
•
11
•@MrBlueSky Your largest positions, apart from Palantir, confirm my assumption 😁
•
11
•@Ph1l1pp We'll see who's right in the future. But you obviously don't seem to know anything about ICP... then unfortunately it's difficult for me to give your opinion. Judging whether a project is "garbage" without research is rather childish.
••
@risk_manager_2176 Okay, here's a short summary for you:
- DFINITY Foundation holds 24%
- Loss of value since launch at over 90%
- low usage and DApps compared to eth or Solana
- Hardly any active developers and community
- DFINITY Foundation holds 24%
- Loss of value since launch at over 90%
- low usage and DApps compared to eth or Solana
- Hardly any active developers and community
•
11
•@Ph1l1pp look, you are obviously one of those investors who only buy what has already been hyped or at least "approved" by the mainstream press. Just like 93% of all other investors who don't realize that they are the masses paying for the party.
1. It is normal that a large part of the volume in the development phase is held by the developers. The project should not go bankrupt along the way! decentralization develops over time & usage.
2. the loss in value is attributable to SBF, which launched an attack against ICP in perpetual trading at the time (out of fear of ICP).
3. the statement is simply wrong. Please have a look. Have a look at Craptomiso.com to see where and how much is being built.
4. regarding the community - we'll see. ICP is years ahead of Solana & Co.
ICP is significantly faster and more reliable than Solana. The reverse gas model was copied by Sui and Near is trying to copy CK-tech.
No other chain can store large volumes of data/software.
The investment opportunity is NOW - before the market realizes it ;-)
1. It is normal that a large part of the volume in the development phase is held by the developers. The project should not go bankrupt along the way! decentralization develops over time & usage.
2. the loss in value is attributable to SBF, which launched an attack against ICP in perpetual trading at the time (out of fear of ICP).
3. the statement is simply wrong. Please have a look. Have a look at Craptomiso.com to see where and how much is being built.
4. regarding the community - we'll see. ICP is years ahead of Solana & Co.
ICP is significantly faster and more reliable than Solana. The reverse gas model was copied by Sui and Near is trying to copy CK-tech.
No other chain can store large volumes of data/software.
The investment opportunity is NOW - before the market realizes it ;-)
••
@MrBlueSky You're right, I prefer to bet on trains that are already running instead of running after the departing one 🙂
••
@Ph1l1pp high risk high reward, or then just low risk low reward
••
@risk_manager_2176 am satisfied with 3-5x (in your perception then probably low reward)
••
@Ph1l1pp....No way, that's perfectly fine. We all have our own individual risk appetite.
However, the charts speak a very clear language and fundamentally ICP cuts an excellent figure anyway.
An ETP would hardly have been issued for a "shitcoin".
I feel very comfortable with my ICP position and just wanted to point out to you that there is an opportunity here. In retrospect, something like this is always worthless ;-)
However, the charts speak a very clear language and fundamentally ICP cuts an excellent figure anyway.
An ETP would hardly have been issued for a "shitcoin".
I feel very comfortable with my ICP position and just wanted to point out to you that there is an opportunity here. In retrospect, something like this is always worthless ;-)
•
22
•