2G·

Infrastructure and waste disposal: The profiteers of the nuclear boom

Dear Community,


Where the hunger for energy is being met by nuclear power and the new generation of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), a massive growth market for downstream services is inevitably emerging.

This applies above all to nuclear waste disposal, the professional dismantling of old plants and the recycling of fuels and water.

Since there is currently no pure "nuclear waste ETF" (at least that I am aware of), we investors must focus on specialized individual stocks that are global leaders in the disposal of uranium and contaminated components (including water).


1. the operational heavyweights for dismantling and disposal


  • Veolia ($VIE (+0,59%)
    ): Although Veolia is primarily perceived as a global environmental services provider, it also operates a nuclear power plant with Veolia Nuclear Solutions a highly specialized division. As the global market leader in robot-assisted cleaning and the dismantling of highly radioactive sites (such as Fukushima), they are indispensable. They offer technologies for the vitrification of waste ("vitrification", the transformation of liquid or solid nuclear waste into a solid glass body) and for water treatment in contaminated areas. Veolia thus bridges the gap to the traditional water business and covers two key areas in its portfolio at the same time.


  • Fortum ($FORTUM (+2,08%)
    ): The Finnish energy group is a hidden champion of nuclear aftercare. In addition to operating power plants, Fortum offers specialized services for the purification of radioactive liquids (NUKEM technology) and final disposal. They are a key player in European waste management standards.


  • Jacobs Solutions ($J (+0,79%)
    ): The US engineering services giant manages major government nuclear sites such as Sellafield (UK) and Hanford (USA). Its focus is on program management for the long-term storage of fuel elements. The SMR connection is particularly exciting: Jacobs is already advising numerous developers on planning the entire life cycle, including disposal.


  • Perma-Fix Environmental Services ($PESI (+1,53%)
    ): Perma-Fix is regarded as one of the few genuine "pure plays". The company operates its own facilities for the treatment of nuclear and mixed waste. Its core competence lies in massively reducing the volume of nuclear waste before it is transferred to a final repository.


2 The fuel cycle: Cameco and Westinghouse


Cameco ($CCO (-1,83%)
) is primarily known as a uranium producer, but together with Brookfield Asset Management holds a majority stake in Westinghouse Electric Corporation (electrical engineering). The company thus covers the entire cycle:


  • Operations: Cameco produces uranium concentrate (yellowcake), while Westinghouse supplies the reactor technology and maintenance.


  • Disposal expertise: Through Westinghouse, Cameco covers the lucrative "back end". This includes the decontamination of process water as well as the conditioning and volume reduction of of radioactive waste.


  • Dismantling service: As a technological market leader, the team offers solutions for the dismantling (D&D) of old plants, using specialized filter systems to clean contaminated liquids.


  • Market model: Sales are stable through long-term supply contracts. The service division makes the company less dependent on fluctuations in the uranium price, as maintenance and waste treatment are permanent tasks required by law.


Energy Fuels ($UUUU (-6,31%)
): This company occupies a strategic niche. In its White Mesa Mill they recover uranium from residual materials and waste from other industries. This positions Energy Fuels as a pioneer in "uranium recycling", which reduces dependence on primary extraction and makes waste streams economically viable.


3. specialty materials and water technology


In the nuclear industry, water is not only a coolant, but often also a transport medium for contaminants. This is where the technology leaders come into play:


  • Xylem Inc. ($XYL (-8,04%)
    ): As a pure water technology company, Xylem supplies the heavy-duty pumping and filtration systems that are essential for the cooling circuits of modern reactors and subsequent wastewater treatment.


  • Danaher Corporation ($DHR (+0,68%)
    ): Via the divested environmental division Veralto Danaher offers high-precision analytical instruments for monitoring water quality - a critical component for detecting leaks and contamination in real time.


  • Umicore ($UMI (-2,54%)
    ): The materials technology group is pursuing a "closed-loop" model. In the long term, its expertise in recovering metals from complex industrial waste could play a role in the recycling of power plant components.


The new generation of reactors: SMR specialists in detail

When it comes to direct energy supply for the AI sector, two companies are in the spotlight:


  • NuScale Power ($SMR
    ): The conservative pioneer relies on proven light water reactor technology (VOYGR™). As NuScale traditionally relies on water, the need for water technology (pumps, filters from suppliers such as Xylem) is extremely high. This makes NuScale an ideal partner for traditional infrastructure investors.


  • Oklo Inc.$OKLO
    ): The radical innovator (supported by Sam Altman) develops "fast reactors". The key feature: these can be fueled with recycled nuclear waste (HALEU). Oklo transforms a disposal problem directly into an energy source and thus addresses the waste problem at its root.


Strategic conclusion


If you want to bridge the gap between water cooling and waste disposal, you will find in Veolia the most stable connection.


Jacobs Solutions and Perma-Fix are the most direct options for physical dismantling.

Energy Fuels offers an exciting bet on the recycling of uranium residues, while Xylem and Danaher provide the indispensable technological basis for water management in a nuclear renaissance.


However, the decisive strategic winner of the current nuclear renaissance could be the team of Cameco & Westinghouse ($CCO) (-1,83%) could be:


By merging uranium mining and reactor technology, they have created a vertically integrated business model. They not only profit from the sale of the fuel, but also control the entire downstream value chain via Westinghouse - from the purification of the process water to the final storage preparation.

As a result, Cameco has risen from a pure mining player to an indispensable infrastructure partner for the energy and AI economy.


In addition, the 80 billion dollar agreement with the US government agreed at the end of 2025 is likely to have cemented Cameco's long-term market leadership in the West (https://de.marketscreener.com/boerse-nachrichten/westinghouse-electric-cameco-und-brookfield-starten-80-milliarden-dollar-offensive-fuer-atomkraft-in-ce7d5ddcd88cf127).


Risk analysis

The nuclear renaissance is more real today than it was ten years ago, but as investors we need to look at two sides of the coin:


Opportunities through regulatory certainty: Waste disposal and dismantling are not "optional services", but permanent tasks prescribed by law. Financing is often already secured by existing provisions of the groups, which makes the service providers (Veolia, Jacobs, Perma-Fix) crisis-resistant.

Risks: Political risks remain. A change of government can delay approval processes for final storage facilities. In addition, the sector is highly emotional; ESG ratings often (still?!) determine how much capital actually flows into the shares.


Could water and waste management technology end up being the safer investment than the actual SMR builders, because it makes money from every technological outcome? How do you see the risk/reward ratio?


Best regards and thank you very much for the positive response and all the feedback on my previous and very first post ✌🏼


Anderlé

17
10 Commenti

immagine del profilo
Thank you for the interesting article. In my opinion, you are addressing exactly the right thoughts. Uranium is currently an extremely exciting topic. Let's see when the downstream industries will benefit accordingly.

Personally, I am currently still playing the hype cycle around the manufacturers, as I expect a greater return here in the short term. In the long term, however, the music is at least as strong here.
3
immagine del profilo
@Liebesspieler Thanks, glad to hear it! ✌🏼
immagine del profilo
Thank you my dear. I have had similar thoughts for some time. I would like to analyze Jacobs and Perma again individually. If you don't mind.
2
immagine del profilo
@Tenbagger2024 Sure, I'd love to! ✌🏼
1
immagine del profilo
I asked Copilot whether there is a renaissance of nuclear power. The answer:

In short: No, there is currently no global "renaissance" of nuclear power. The available data rather shows stagnation - with a slightly decreasing number of reactors, stable output and very limited new construction. The narrative of a global return to nuclear energy does not stand up to sober scrutiny.

🌍 Global situation of nuclear power

1. reactor stock shrinks slightly

- At the beginning of 2025, 404 reactors were in operation worldwide - five fewer than in the previous year.
Frankfurt ...
- Total output remains stable (369 GW), but only because existing reactors are delivering more power.
Frankfurt ...


2. new construction remains weak

- In 2025, only four new reactors will be connected to the grid worldwide (China, India, Russia).
Frankfurt ...
- At the same time, seven plants were decommissioned (Belgium, Russia, Taiwan).
Frankfurt ...
- In 2024, the net increase was only two reactors.
renewable ...


3. construction projects are concentrated almost exclusively in China

- 66 reactors are under construction worldwide, 36 of them in China alone.
Frankfurt ...
- Not a single commercial reactor is being built on the entire American continent.
Frankfurt ...


4 Europe: Dismantling instead of renaissance

- The number of EU reactors has fallen below 100 by 2025.
Sunny side
- Belgium is shutting down, Taiwan has completely withdrawn.
Frankfurt ...


💸 Why has the renaissance failed to materialize?

High costs & extreme construction times

- Example Flamanville 3 (France):- planned: €3.3 billion, 5 years
- Reality: € 23.7 billion, 17 years
renewable-...



Financial risks

- Private investors avoid nuclear power; almost only state actors are still building.
renewable-...


SMR (Small Modular Reactors) do not deliver

- The US flagship project was discontinued due to exploding costs.
renewable-...


Renewable energies overtake nuclear power by far

- China installed 277,000 MW of solar capacity in 2024 - 70 times the newly installed nuclear power capacity worldwide.
renewable-...


📌 Conclusion

There is no global renaissance, but:

- Stagnation of nuclear power,
- Declines in many industrialized countries,
- Concentration of new construction in a few countries (especially China),
- massive competition from faster and cheaper renewable energies.


If you like, I can also provide you with a regional analysis (Europe, Asia, USA) or an assessment of the future prospects of nuclear power.
2
immagine del profilo
@randomdude Thank you for your input. Renewable energy may be cheaper, but I still see a big advantage of nuclear energy.

Big tech giants need an extremely high base load capability, as e.g. AI data centers (have to) run 24/7 under full load.

In my opinion, renewable energies are currently (still) very intermittent. Without massive (and currently still expensive long-term storage facilities), the constant load of AI clusters alone is very difficult to cover.
Nuclear power provides this constant energy without CO₂ emissions. This is why companies such as Amazon are buying entire data centers right next to nuclear power plants (e.g. the Talen Energy project in the USA).

We'll see how it looks in the future, but at the moment it doesn't work with pure renewable energy (would be desirable) ✌🏼
1
immagine del profilo
I can only recommend $NUKL. I have been invested for just under a year and am very satisfied, covering almost everything in uranium mining and nuclear energy infrastructure. But no less volatile than the Nasdaq100.
1
immagine del profilo
@Derspekulant1 Thank you! There is a lot in there that I have reported on. However, the ETF is aimed at "pure players". Xylem or Veolia are excluded. But you can still add them to the ETF / besparen✌🏼
How long have you been invested in the ETF?
1
Great evening reading, thank you my dear 💪
1
immagine del profilo
@Johannes12345 Thank you! I'm delighted that you're enjoying it ✌🏼
1
Partecipa alla conversazione