$META (-0,54%) on Monday Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full on Monday and calls them his first Frontier models —in other words, the first generation that the company considers to be on par with the industry’s best.
Meta offers access in two ways:
Developers who build their own applications on the (Muse Wonder) book it through an API and pay based on the amount of text processed, calculated in tokens. The more powerful Wonder Full is available exclusively as a subscription in Meta’s own programming tool Muse Code. It is available for $50per month and, at the premium level, for $200per month, each with its own usage limits.
A comparison of token prices:
- Muse Wonder:
$4 per million input tokens, $20 per million output tokens - Claude Opus 5.5:
$4 and $20 (identical) - Muse Spark 1.3, Meta's predecessor from early September: $1.25 and $4.25
In Meta’s own benchmark table, "Wonder" 9 out of 14 measurements to Opus 5.5. It leads in modifying existing code and in memory retention across multiple conversations. It trails in the independent overall ranking, in recreating complete programs, and in operating a computer.
Limitation: Meta itself has not provided Meta itself and describes them as “best-effort”. Model sizes and training effort therefore remain unpublished.
Overall , these models cost the same as Opus but perform slightly worse.
However, this can be seen as Meta’s first step toward properly monetizing its models and computing power and thereby taking on the competition.
Sources:
https://about.fb.com/news/2026/10/introducing-muse-wonder-models/
