1G
Thanks for sharing.
I fully hear you, on the self-reflection part.
What needs to support your conviction is real data.
Personally, I like to play the highest level, long term macro trends, driven by geography and demographics.
No matter what your conviction is: ask yourself what real data would invalidate your thesis.
I fully hear you, on the self-reflection part.
What needs to support your conviction is real data.
Personally, I like to play the highest level, long term macro trends, driven by geography and demographics.
No matter what your conviction is: ask yourself what real data would invalidate your thesis.
•
11
•
@BigMo Yes, you are right. It is about "allowing" views which contradict your convictions. Need to leave the bubbles, because you always find a lot of ways to justify your convictions if you only look for supporting thesis. I have started to actively challenge my views - with exception of Crypto. I don't like 😬😜
•
11
•