1G·

Carl Zeiss Meditec AG - H1 figures and the "kitchen sink" scenario

Today, the new quarterly figures from $AFX (-11,27%) which I took a very close look at. As many of you know, it's an absolute problem stock that has seen a total decline of around -90%, so even as an early bird investor, you've got a lot on your plate here.


Realizing losses hurts, which is why I have considered precise scenarios in advance under which I will immediately press "sell", no matter what happens. Such scenarios would be, for example, another disappointment in the market or a management that is not activist and only manages the downfall.


However, the actual prospects were well received by the market - but that doesn't automatically mean that I have high hopes for the share. Emotionally, at least for me, it's a good reason to "sell anyway" simply because the price is good today and then you simply have a certain kind of peace of mind when you dump bad stocks.

Rationally, the reasons for such a sale are always twofold: A) The money can work better elsewhere and achieve safer returns and B) There is a real risk of losing even more money than you have already lost.


At least reason A) is currently not a real argument for me. Especially after the recent sales and non-purchases, my cash ratio is currently higher than it has been since 2024. In this respect, I would NOT reinvest the money from a $AFX (-11,27%) I would NOT be able to reinvest the money from a sale, but only put it in the cash pile.


Nevertheless, this time I want to make absolutely sure that I don't react emotionally and continue to hold the share just because I'm afraid of losses or whatever. That's why I have once again sold Gemini (because my Claude volume is already empty again) to get a neutral view of things.


Disclaimer: The following text section was partly written with the help of AI - which I do transparently, unlike some weird coin farmers. If you're not interested, there's a "Sopranos conclusion" at the end


"1 Current market situation & H1 figures (as at May 2026)

The results presented today show a mixed but "relieving" picture for the market:

  • Turnover: At approx. 991 million in the first half of the year, the company is 5.7 % below the previous yearbut exceeded analysts' greatly reduced expectations (following several profit warnings).
  • Profitability: The adjusted EBITA margin slumped to 6.1 % (previous year: 10.7 %). The main reasons for this are currency losses (in particular the Chinese yuan), a weak product mix in China and high inventories.
  • Restructuring: The newly announced program "ProfitUp" program program is intended to lift the margin back above 15% by the 2028/29 financial year and into the 16-20% range in the long term.


2. arguments for the valuation (pros & cons)

Market leadership: Zeiss remains a technogogical champion in ophthalmology (eye care) and microsurgery.

China risk: Business in China (approx. 21% of sales) suffers from government price targets (VBP) and geopolitical tensions.

Demographics: The long-term trend of an ageing global population is ensuring a steady increase in demand for cataract surgery.

Investment backlog: In the US, clinics are holding back on large equipment (microscopes) due to high interest rates and economic uncertainty.

Turnaround potential: With the "ProfitUp" program, management is aggressively addressing the cost structure for the first time.

Valuation: Despite the fall in the share price, the P/E ratio (P/E) of approx. 17-20 is not exactly cheap for the current growth rate of approx. 5%.

Order backlog: With 435 m € the cushion is solid, which provides a certain degree of planning security for the second half of the year.

Currency effects: The strong dependence on exports makes Zeiss susceptible to fluctuations in USD and CNY.


3. analyst estimates & price targets

The majority of institutional analysts have changed their recommendations in recent months to "Hold" downgraded to "Hold". However, after today's figures there are first positive comments:

  • Barclays: "Equal Weight" (Neutral) with target price 30 €.
  • Goldman Sachs: "Hold" with target price 31 € (recently lowered from € 36).
  • JPMorgan: Remains rather skeptical with a "Sell"-rating, but sees the bottom approaching.
  • Consensus price target: Currently moves in a range of 28 € to 33 €.


4 Conclusion: Buy, Hold or Sell?

Rating: HOLD

  • For existing shareholders: Selling at the current level (approx. € 28) does not appear to make much sense, as operating margins have probably bottomed out. Today's share price reaction shows that much of the negative has already been priced in.
  • For new buyers: There is no urgent need to enter the market yet. Although the long-term potential is intact, the implementation of the restructuring program will take time. The share is currently a bet on a recovery in China and the success of the internal efficiency measures.


Recommendation: Watch for confirmation of the uptrend. A sustained breakout above the 32-euro mark could generate a technical buy signal. Conservative investors should wait for the next quarter to see whether the erosion of margins has actually been halted."


Soprano's conclusion: I will stick to this recommendation for the time being, but will update the case regularly. Basically, I have emotionally closed the Zeiss chapter, but I would actually find it pointless to sell if I am not doing anything with the money anyway and the bottom seems to have been reached.


At the moment we are in a "kitchen sink", i.e. a period in which everything negative is already included in the share price and pessimism is at its maximum - that's why the share price is rising despite poor figures, because the fears were even more negative.


AFX is now reacting. They want to increase the margin. They are cutting jobs - especially in their currently worst economic location (Germany). If this turnaround does not succeed, they can still close down the whole business and sell the silverware. That would be at a price of €20. It would then also be extremely interesting as a takeover candidate. At the moment, however, the market believes in the restructuring. If this actually succeeds or at least progress is evident, a few more euros can be picked up by the fall and then still be sold with a sufficient loss (don't worry, we won't get out of this in the foreseeable future)

attachment
8
10 Commenti

Totally crazy that cutting jobs at the headquarters is the best thing for the company. Carl is spinning in his grave.
2
immagine del profilo
@fund_navigator_elshq Bismarck also rotates. You're absolutely right with your comment. In human terms, it is absolutely disastrous that the market is now rewarding companies for closing down in Germany. We were just talking on Friday about the fact that $BNTX is laying off almost 1/3 of its global workforce exclusively in Germany and that the share price has not dropped a bit as a result. And many other VW, Bosch, SAP, ZF Friedrichshafen, Continental and BASF are also cutting jobs. For a country where business and technology have always been at the top of the political agenda, this is a serious blow.
1
@Soprano... An indictment of poverty.

I hope the voters will give us a lesson next year in the inevitable new election and we can get back to making policy for Germany and for Germans 👍
1
Utente eliminato
1G
Il commento è stato cancellato
immagine del profilo
@Stilgar Completely unnecessary hate comments, what's the point?
1
immagine del profilo
@fund_navigator_elshq The lesson will not fix it. Voters have been regularly giving them a lesson for 10 years and the result is only more arrogance and hubris in Berlin. Merkel already suffered a huge defeat in 2017 and has drawn personal but no political consequences from it. In 2002, the CDU/CSU and SPD together held 82% of the seats in parliament - if elections were held on Sunday, it would still be 40%.

The voters want a different policy, which allows only one logical conclusion: We need different voters.

Politics is not known to be wrong. There will be a black-red-green coalition and then Wüst or Spahn will become chancellor. Habeck will become Economics Minister again. That's what we've all been waiting for.
@Soprano well then I don't understand why the left are always moaning about why there were more and more re-elections in Weimar until the downfall. It's their own fault, they haven't learned anything, they're causing it themselves (on purpose?):

Reichstag election 1928
Reichstag election 1930
Reichstag election July 1932
Reichstag election November 1932
Reichstag election March 1933
Boom.
immagine del profilo
@fund_navigator_elshq Well, left-wingers are emotional by nature and not logical people. Even in Weimar there were left-wing majorities and the SPD, as the largest and most important party, managed to ignore (and in some cases simply deceive) its own voters until democracy was completely destabilized.

Social Democrats often talk about "learning from history" to prevent a new NSDAP. Learning from history means - I think - that you have to make policies for all voters and not just for your own friends if you want to prevent extremism. Something along the lines of reconciliation and shaking hands.

But what today's leftists think "learning from history" means is that you need an even bigger club to hit everything you don't want to see.
immagine del profilo
I am still involved. For years. Unfortunately with a big -70%. I come from the industry myself and thought nothing can and will replace Zeiss.
1
immagine del profilo
They are not being disrupted, but are facing other challenges
Partecipa alla conversazione