Anyone have any idea what's going on at Intuitive Surgical $ISRG (+0,89%) is going on? They recently presented decent figures, but the share price has been falling steadily since May 🧐

Intuitive
Price
Discussione su ISRG
Messaggi
58Intuitive Surgical Q2'25 Earnings Highlights
🔹 Revenue: $2.44B (Est. $2.35B) 🟢; UP +21% YoY
🔹 EPS : $2.19 (Est. $1.93) 🟢; UP +23% YoY
Non-GAAP FY25 Guidance:
🔸 Worldwide da Vinci Procedure Growth: ~15.5% to 17%
🔸 Gross Margin: 66%–67%; includes ~1% tariff impact
🔸 OpEx Growth: 10%–14%
Q2 Segment:
🔹 Instruments & Accessories Revenue: $1.47B; UP +18% YoY
🔹 Systems Revenue: $575M; UP +28% YoY
🔹 395 da Vinci Surgical Systems Placed (vs. 341 YoY); includes 180 da Vinci 5 systems (vs. 70 YoY)
🔹 Installed Base: 10,488 systems; UP +14% YoY
🔹 Worldwide da Vinci Procedures: UP +17% YoY
Other Metrics
🔹 Net Income: $798M; UP +24% YoY
🔹 Income from Operations: $947M; UP +26% YoY
🔹 Cash, Equivalents & Investments: $9.53B; UP $431M QoQ
🔹 GAAP Operating Income: $743M; UP +31% YoY
🔹 Share-Based Compensation: $200M (included in GAAP Ops Income)
CEO Commentary
🔸 “We’re pleased with our solid performance this quarter, highlighted by continued customer adoption of our newer and existing platforms, including da Vinci 5.” — CEO Dave Rosa
🔸 “We are committed to advancing care and helping our customers provide better patient outcomes, better patient and care team experiences, broadening access to care and decreasing the total cost of care.”
Valuation Healthcare sector - Goldman Sachs
$XDWH (+0,22%)
$XLV (+0,12%)
$CSPX (+0,5%)
$VUSA (+0,5%)
$UNH (+3,25%)
$OSCR
According to Goldman Sachs, healthcare is the only sector in the S& P 500 that is cheaper than the 10- and 30-year averages.
This is an extremely attractive risk/reward ratio and the coming months will be exciting.
$ELV (+0,04%)
$CNC (+2,57%)
$DHR (+2,04%)
$SRT (+8,35%)
$LLY (+0,87%)
$NOVO B (-0,5%)
$NVO (-0,35%)
$ISRG (+0,89%)
$JNJ (-1,26%)
$ABBV (-0,47%)
$PFE (-0,38%)
$SAN (+1,13%)
$MRK (-0,15%)
$BMY (+1,09%)
$TMO (+2,52%)

Weak US healthcare sector
$UNH (+3,25%)
$OSCR
$XDWH (+0,22%)
$ELV (+0,04%)
$LLY (+0,87%)
$XLV (+0,12%)
The US healthcare sector is experiencing its biggest crash in the last 20 years.
If the strong weighting no. 1 $LLY (+0,87%) (over 12%), one would have to go back even further/longer. (probably before the existence of the ETF).
I have positioned myself strongly here as I believe this is a great opportunity.
I also believe that a lot of capital will flow into the sector in the coming months. ✌️
Do you have a similar view? ✌️

But I'm wondering whether I should get in before August.
Doctor and machine hand in hand: 2,000 operations with surgical robots at the Diakonie Klinikum in Siegen
The Diakonie Klinikum in Siegen has reached a milestone with its modern Da Vinci surgical robot. Under the direction of head physician Dr. Mahmoud Farzat, more than 2,000 operations have been successfully performed.
A good five years ago, the Diakonie Klinikum in Siegen invested in the high-tech Da Vinci surgical robot, a decision that proved to be groundbreaking for the urology department. Today, the team led by Head Physician Dr. Mahmoud Farzat can look back on over 2,000 robot-assisted operations. Dr. Farzat is proud: "The milestone of 2,000 robot-assisted operations in just over five years is a clear testament to the expertise and commitment of our entire team."
Robot-assisted surgery has established itself as a gentle surgical method, particularly for prostate, kidney and bladder cancer as well as other complex diseases of the urinary tract. "Thanks to the robot's fine motor skills and magnified view, we can precisely identify and operate on even the smallest structures," explains Dr. Farzat. This has already helped to treat over 1,000 prostate cancer patients and more than 200 bladder cancer and 300 kidney cancer patients.
With two Da Vinci surgical robots and an experienced team of surgeons, anaesthetists and nursing staff, Stilling is one of the larger centers of its kind in Germany. The clinic attracts patients from all over the country and abroad. The clinic is also committed to scientific research, regularly publishing papers and presenting its findings at specialist congresses. "This scientific work enables us to continuously improve our methods," emphasizes Dr. Farzat. (PM/Red)

Depotroast - my way
TL;DR like to roast my deposit, appreciate all opinions!
I always find the many posts here and reading various biographies very interesting, so I've wanted to say a few words for a while now.
Tried early, but started late
I am now 32 and unfortunately started investing seriously far too late, studied far too long, and with the larger salaries finally built up as much as possible and tried to catch up as quickly as possible. "Unfortunately" means for the most part the past calendar year, which is why I put a large part of my money into shares at already high prices and then had very little cash left in the crash to add to it. Fully invested, in other words. During the crash, I mainly reallocated and continued to fully invest what was left over from my monthly salaries.
Yet back in 2011, at the age of 18, I had a share called Facebook and a Starbucks share in my portfolio without much of a clue. I just wanted to know what my mother was actually doing with her shares and how it worked, and with FB and Starbucks I simply chose two companies that "everyone" uses/needs anyway. The idea wasn't that stupid, it worked, and after a short time I was happy about the small profit in absolute terms, sold the shares at DiBa despite the high fees at the time and simply forgot about shares for years - wealth accumulation, a word that wasn't in my vocabulary, the money I had was simply turned upside down as a young adult. Well, young me, just leave the shares lying around or, even better, take a closer look at them and carry on, it "might" have been worth it...
Of priorities and wrong horses
The years went by without any shares, but with lots of fast food and partying, but at least things have changed. At some point, I started to think about the future and wealth accumulation, first taking an interest in interest rates, and then the logical next step was dividends and shares. Unfortunately, it started rather haphazardly. As a student, I started investing small amounts, and of course betting on the wrong horses. Speculative lithium shares were particularly bad in this phase, unfortunately these were large sums even by my standards, from my grandfather's estate. That was bad. However, crypto was a very good horse, more precisely $BTC (-0,45%) and $ETH (-0,42%) which (as a computer scientist) I became interested in early on and exited several times with high profits, also thanks to domestic mining. It's just stupid that back then, in the last decade, I would never have imagined how cryptos would develop. If I had, I would have simply left it all, or at least part of it. You learn and you're always smarter afterwards anyway.
Fully invested - excessive, unhealthy, or simply good housekeeping?
So now I'm 32 - and proud of a portfolio that I think I've built up to a good size in a relatively short time. Which has given me other ideas for some time now. I'm still a long way from reaching my goal, but I have to get back on the "invest 100%" path, which has been completely contrary to my past for a long time now, and strangely enough, I'm finding it difficult to do so - something to reflect on. There are too many (supposed?) opportunities every day. So I simply could not $UNH (+3,25%) after a long period of observation yesterday and of course the savings plans had to run today too. I think I've always been good at budgeting, or let's put it this way, at least good at getting by with the money available to me in a perfectly timed way, but "indulging", not just in company shares, may become a little more prominent again. I don't go without noticeably in everyday life, I need very little, which I don't think is a bad quality to begin with. But I have changed a lot in the area of "consumption" compared to the past. I think it would be good to find a healthy balance. In my opinion, just as you don't just live to work, but work to live, the same applies to saving/investing. I actually read a post here on gq today that described exactly that and I could relate to it very well. So, reflection and taking your foot off the gas is allowed - no, it's a must! I am familiar with frugalists, but I never wanted to be one. I'd be interested to know if anyone else here feels the same way, or did?
Wrong decisions, mistakes... and (hopefully) the right conclusions
Back to the topic! (Not only) on the way to today's portfolio I have made many wrong decisions, as already mentioned, so I thought that a well-kept portfolio roast could do me some good. Other, new opinions and assessments can't be bad!
In particular, in the past I have often missed the opportunity to simply let profits run their course and instead dragged losses around with me for too long (which brings us back to lithium). A thought that I recently had again when I was thinking about when it would make sense to $HIMS (-4,25%) possibly realize, as an example. $PLTR (+1,68%) and $NVDA (+0,03%) are two examples that, like so many others, I naturally had on my radar, but they always seemed too expensive, the setback never came and I really missed the big rallies as a result. At the same time, I also get caught out by FOMO from time to time. So in both good and bad phases, I try not to just see red or green, fear or hope, but simply to evaluate what actually makes sense "from now on". Sometimes you realize a loss in order to try your luck elsewhere, sometimes you should let profits run, sometimes take them, sometimes endure the dip, sometimes be courageous and sometimes defensive. Easier said than done. I find it very nice and helpful to exchange ideas on this platform and how open and "yet" respectful it generally is. Of course, I will most likely never reach some portfolio sizes, but you can always learn something about how some people manage their portfolios, regardless of the absolute figures. You will always make mistakes, but at least you should deal with them correctly and draw the best possible conclusions.
Portfolio restructuring, planned investments / savings plans
And today? After some evaluation, research, regrouping and restructuring, I now have fewer, but still quite a few positions in different sectors, most of which are already of a decent and roughly balanced size. My medium-term plan is now to build up all positions to a certain target size. This is why I am currently running savings plans:
ETF/ETC:
Partly with small weekly amounts, until enough cash is available to fill the target position evenly. With $AVGO (+2,28%) for example, there is not much left. Also $BRK.B (+0,56%) / $APH (+1,21%) and others are already approaching the target. In some cases with somewhat larger sums for still small but prioritized positions, until opportunities and/or resources for individual purchases arise, such as the $ALV (+0,28%) and $RSG (-2%) should be mentioned here, as well as $DGE (-0,42%) as a turnaround candidate.
Once the aforementioned positions are full, I would like to turn my attention to the more defensive candidates that are already in the portfolio but which I am currently prioritizing - $MCD (-1,48%) / $KO (-0,3%) / $CCEP (-1,84%) / $ULVR (-0,29%) and others - and finally increase the ETF and gold share in the long term.
$VKTX (+3,21%) is a bit of a gamble, as I have actually said goodbye to pharma - $ABBV (-0,47%) / $NOVO B (-0,5%) / $LLY (+0,87%) and $MRK (-0,15%) were still part of the inventory until recently. Instead, I decided to go with $DXCM (+1,79%) / $ISRG (+0,89%) / $DHR (+2,04%) on medical technology.
$BTC (-0,45%) remains a fixed value in the portfolio, while I $ETH (-0,42%) (incorrectly entered due to staking - around 0.4 shares or €1000) and $XRP (-1,25%) would/will sell at corresponding prices.
I still lack around €15,000 in individual stocks at current prices to bring all positions to the current desired/dream target. This will take some time, but is foreseeable. And then I would be really quite proud and happy "as things stand now"! In any case, I now feel very comfortable on the path I have chosen and, as I said, I have to stop myself from forgetting that not all money has to be invested all the time.
Savings rate
To put this into figures, I have averaged a savings rate of around €1500 over the last 24 months, with an average of €100 a month in dividends. 1400€ investment, that's about 82% of my monthly budget after deducting all "unavoidable" fixed costs including fuel and household, but not including consumption such as clothes, going out or vacations. Exaggerated, I can't say otherwise myself. But at least I have a good reason to step on the gas and get the compound interest going.
So what is all this for?
In the long term, my girlfriend and I dream of owning a property somewhere on the Croatian Adriatic, her homeland, and where I was able to spend many wonderful weeks with my parents every year as a child. A beautiful region that I consider an important part of my life, with many great moments and memories that may become even more. I hope to get closer to this goal "quickly" with the depot. The language is already halfway there! :)
In the long term, this would probably involve a little reallocation into value dividend payers, which should help with repayment. However, I would also like to lay the foundations for later distributions today, without neglecting growth. There is probably no perfect mix for this, but you are welcome to rate mine.
So, unfortunately I was once again unable to be brief. Thank you for reading, whoever has made it this far, and for your comments! I'm very excited and wish you all a great weekend.
i would slim it down to 25 positions, pursue a core-satellite approach. stability through the etfs, return booster through individual stocks and crypto.
i would also find it difficult to follow the news with so many positions. in my opinion, sometimes less really is more.
but make the individual positions larger, then price rises will also have more impact.
good luck for the future!
Current portfolio and planned changes in 2025
Hello Community,
I thought it was time to post my portfolio again and what adjustments and plans are still taking place for the year 2025.
My portfolio currently consists of the classic $IWDA (+0,43%) , $EIMI (+0,87%) and the $CSNDX (+0,71%) .
Further additions are $WGLD (-0,89%) and $BTC (-0,45%) only.
My remaining satellites are targeted additions in order to expand the focus to Europe and Japan on the one hand and to provide a yield boost in the portfolio on the other.
I currently continue to invest in all ETFs, gold and Bitcoin on a monthly basis.
Upcoming changes:
I will shift a portion from the call money account into the $XEON (-0,02%) into the
It may be planned to make another additional purchase at $NOVO B (-0,5%) is planned.
expected new additions this year:
These are also joining the ranks as targeted satellites and, for me, represent three further interesting, fast-growing and sustainable sectors.
Have a nice weekend :)
LG
Paul
Intuitive Surgical Q1'25 Earnings Highlights
🔹 Adj. EPS: $1.81 (Est: $1.72) 🟢; ▲ +21% YoY
🔹 Revenue: $2.25B (Est: $2.19B) 🟢; ▲ +19% YoY
🔸 FY25 margin guidance reflects 1.7% revenue impact from current tariffs. Additional tariffs may materially impact financials further.
Segment Performance
🔹 Instruments & Accessories Revenue: $1.37B (Est: $1.34B) 🟢; ▲ +18% YoY
🔹 Systems Revenue: $523M; ▲ +25% YoY
🔹 Services Revenue: $356M; ▲ +13% YoY
Operating Metrics
🔹 da Vinci Procedures Growth: ▲ +17% YoY
🔹 Systems Placed: 367 units (vs. 313 YoY)
• 147 da Vinci 5 systems (vs. 8 YoY)
🔹 Installed Base: 10,189 systems (▲ +15% YoY)
🔹 Operating Cash Flow: $— (Cash up $269M in Q1)
🔹 Ending Cash & Investments: $9.10B
FY25 Guidance
🔹 Worldwide Procedure Growth: 15%–17%
🔹 Gross Margin (non-GAAP): 65%–66.5% (vs. 69.1% FY24)
🔹 Operating Expense Growth (non-GAAP): 10%–14%
🔸 Tariff headwind: ~170 bps impact to margins expected
CEO Commentary
🔸 “Core measures of our business were healthy this quarter, and we are pleased by continued customer adoption of our platforms, including da Vinci 5.” – Gary Guthart, CEO
My favorites in the healthcare sector 💉👩🏼⚕️🧬💊
Good evening everyone,
Here are my favorites for the health sector.
Novo Nordisk $NOVO B (-0,5%)
Stryker $SYK (-1,1%)
Intuitive Surgical (P/E ratio 70, P/B ratio 19 🤑) $ISRG (+0,89%)
Astra Zeneca $AZN (+0,18%)
Zoetis $ZTS (+0%)
Idexx Lab. $IDXX (-0,46%)
Amgen (profit margin declining) $AMGN (-0,64%)
I would be interested to know what your favorites are for a long-term investment?
Sector realignment of my portfolio - a look at returns, risks and allocation
I would like to use the current "black time" to structure my portfolio better and diversify it more. So far, I have overweighted some sectors rather arbitrarily, while others are completely absent. 😅
In order to achieve a more sound, sectoral diversification, I have looked at two things:
1. the long-term performance of the sectors in the S&P 500
2. the maximum drawdowns of these sectors over different time periods
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table shows the average annual returns of the S&P 500 sectors over 10, 20, 30 and 40 years.
It is striking: Some sectors have performed significantly better than others over longer periods of time. Particularly noteworthy are
- Information technology
- Healthcare
- Consumer staples (cyclical consumption)
These sectors achieved long-term average annual returns of over 10% p.a.
By contrast, the following sectors performed less convincingly:
- Energy
- Materials (basic materials)
- Real estate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately, historical drawdown data by sector is limited and not uniformly available. Nevertheless, a clear trend can be identified: The available data shows that defensive sectors tend to have lower drawdowns, while cyclical sectors are more prone to larger declines. So it looks like sectors such as consumer discretionary and healthcare tend to have lower maximum drawdowns, while sectors such as financials and energy have had the sharpest declines.
In the next step, I looked at the current (2024) market weighting of the sectors in the S&P 500, i.e. a market capitalization-weighted allocation as a passive ETF would reflect it:
Information Technology 28%
Healthcare 13 %
Financial services 12 %
Consumer Discretionary 10%
Communication services 8 %
Industry 8 %
Consumer staples 6 %
Energy 4 %
Utilities 3 %
Materials 2.5 %
Real estate 2.5 %
This is the first time I realize how much you have to overweight or underweight a sector in order to have the greatest probability of hypothetically beating the market in a fictitious, ideal scenario by means of sectoral overweighting and underweighting.
For example, only a weighting of well over 28% in information technology would have led to a possible outperformance.
Conversely, only a complete abandonment of the real estate sector could have made a positive contribution. (in retrospect)
Of course, this is a gross oversimplification, as each sector consists of a large number of companies of very different quality. Nevertheless, valuable insights for the strategic portfolio orientation can be derived from this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But now I'm at a crossroads.
Option A
I analyze current valuation ratios such as P/E ratios, Shiller P/E ratios or earnings growth per sector and decide on this basis which sectors appear most attractive for the future, i.e. an active, forward-looking approach.
Option B (my favorite):
I take my cue from long-term, historical average returns and risks and use them as a guide for strategic allocation - in other words, a more rule-based approach with a rational derivation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My sectoral target portfolio, based on risk-return profile and personal preference, could look like this:
Let's start from the back, the weakest sectors such as energy, real estate, utilities and basic materials have proven to be underperforming and often volatile over the long term. In total, I would therefore like to limit these to a maximum of 10% of my portfolio.
Industry 8 %
Financial services with 9 %
Communication services 10 %
Consumer staples with 13 %,
Healthcare 15 %
Consumer staples 15%
Information technology 20 %
The above weighting aims to create a portfolio that is both growth-oriented and risk-optimized in the long term.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion 🤓
With this train of thought, I am pursuing a systematic and long-term approach that takes both opportunities and risks into account. The aim is to create a portfolio that remains stable and profitable in different market phases. Of course, it will not always be easy to implement these weightings perfectly in practice, but this strategy provides a clear direction as a basis.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources 🤯
JP Morgan Asset Management - Guide to the Markets
www.vanguard.com Principles for Investing Success

Started fishing a bit today 🎣
Last week was observation, today I started to pick up a bit of what was on my watchlist 😊
starting with a share for the medical/healthcare sector $ISRG (+0,89%)
Titoli di tendenza
I migliori creatori della settimana