8Mes
I had the same consideration a few months ago and opted for $WELL.
It's still young, but with a lot of potential to beat the two ETFs mentioned above.
It's still young, but with a lot of potential to beat the two ETFs mentioned above.
•
11
•
@RaphGM explain the thing to me... what's the exact difference ... Cheaper, I can see that, but that doesn't bother me. Why should it have more potential? Give it a whirl. I'm open to anything :) TOP 10 : I think 72% is already crass and again apple with 18 % .... puhhhh
••
8Mes
@Testo-Investor $WELL is global, not US, despite being fairly centered in the US.
In his first year, he has already beaten both $XUTC and $EQQQ.
Nobody can say whether it will continue like this.
In his first year, he has already beaten both $XUTC and $EQQQ.
Nobody can say whether it will continue like this.
••
@RaphGM Yes, I am very positive for 2024.... of course asml holland is in it, SAP etc.... I just don't like this ultra-heavy weighting of MS, APPLE and NV .... The NAS is a bit more balanced. ... But it certainly has potential.
••
8Mes
@Testo-Investor In the end what is important is not how high the positions are in an ETF, but in your portfolio.
It may well be that Apple makes up over 18% of that ETF, but in the end, if that ETF only weighs 10% of your portfolio, then it may be more acceptable.
Overweighting and overlap analysis only makes sense at the portfolio level, in my opinion.
It may well be that Apple makes up over 18% of that ETF, but in the end, if that ETF only weighs 10% of your portfolio, then it may be more acceptable.
Overweighting and overlap analysis only makes sense at the portfolio level, in my opinion.
••
@RaphGM not quite so relevant for me, because I only want to use it as a yield boost in 2024...
•
11
•