23H·

🏠 Real estate vs. dividend ETF: swap bulk risk for cash flow?

Hello dear community,

I am currently facing a groundbreaking decision in my investment strategy and would appreciate your constructive feedback.

attachment

I was very lucky to inherit a condominium in an apartment building. It was actually a blessing, but on closer inspection two points are giving me a headache:


Lack of control: At the owners' meeting, I can easily be outvoted on major investments (e.g. new heating system).

Financial risk: High running costs for property management and potential special levies could blow my budget - reserves that I could not currently afford on an ad hoc basis.

My plan: Sell the apartment and redeploy the equity to generate immediate, passive cash flow to support my ongoing living expenses.


My focus: The Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Dist)$VHYL (+0,24 %)

I find the approach attractive as it is globally diversified and offers a solid distribution yield. But is this the best choice for 2026 and more importantly the future?


  • What do you think of the Vanguard High Dividend compared to a classic Distributing All-World or more specialized dividend aristocrats?
  • Do you have any alternative ETF suggestions (e.g. from iShares or Fidelity) that might offer a better balance between growth and yield?
  • Is there anyone here who has already taken the "real estate to ETF" step?


I look forward to your opinions and experiences! Here's to a successful rest of 2026 - hopefully we'll all see more green in our portfolios again soon! 📈🚀

#investing
#dividenden
#etf
#immobilien
#finanziellefreiheit
#vanguard
#portfolio

6
14 Commentaires

image de profil
As already mentioned, the $TDIV is much better. This year we are also taking the step of exchanging our apartment building for dividend ETFs.
Although we will then have to pay rent in the house we inherited, we will no longer have any stress and have a higher return.
We will also have to pay less tax.
4
image de profil
I have the $VWRL, the $TDIV and the $VHYL in my custody account, but it is saved for my retirement, which will hopefully be in a few years' time 😊
3
image de profil
If I lived in it myself, I would keep it.
As long as my living situation changes.
Of course, you should be able to earn the service charges.

If it was rented out, would I keep it if I had no experience of renting?

Why?
Experience is everything. You shouldn't be afraid of that.

If there are costs, take out a loan! And pay it off from the rent.

You can deduct 100% of the costs and reduce your income from non-self-employed work.
So don't be afraid of costs that overwhelm you!

Of course, if you don't want it 100%, sell it.

Don't overhype anything, you usually see things a little more emotionally 6 months later.
2
image de profil
Keep the property and gain experience on the capital market first. Then do the math and question your findings again in the community.
1
Have you ever written down the current income/expenses in detail? You can claim any modernization of the property for tax purposes if you rent it out...
How well can the property be rented out? or where is the property located?
Is there an investment backlog and how high are the WEG's reserves (I see from your post that it is a WEG)?
1
@erbsinatorJaExactly, it's a WEG. I'm currently doing the math and thought I'd share my thoughts in case anyone else has already had to make the same decision. I'm mainly interested in looking at the general mood. thanks for your input, I'll ask again about the investment backlog. 👍
image de profil
I am retired and have $VWRL, $VHYL and $TDIV in my portfolio. These three form the core of my investments and I can sleep well at the moment.
1
image de profil
I could buy at least two, if not three two-bedroom apartments in our area with my capital. Without a loan. However, I don't want to do that for one reason, namely flexibility.

Yes, the capital market fluctuates, sometimes considerably, but I don't want to be stuck with this lump sum if certain circumstances change or if I want to emigrate from Germany and then probably have to sell it for less than it's worth if the money needs to be available quickly.

But do the math, maybe your calculation will look different.
image de profil
Good decision. But it's better to use $VWRL or something similar. At least you'll still get a little return on your investment
image de profil
Are you absolutely determined that you want a distributor?
In my opinion, an accumulating All-World is always the best choice and you can always convert shares into cash, which is more tax-efficient than distributions.
image de profil
@Wealth-Accelerator Please explain what is supposed to be more tax-efficient about the accumulating type. When you sell the shares, you also pay tax immediately as with dividends.

And with the advance lump sum and the associated alignment with the distributor, I think this tax deferral effect has been eliminated, at least as of now.
image de profil
@ScorpionfromBW
Wait, with an accumulator you only pay tax on the pro rata profit when you sell. In the case of a distribution, you pay tax on 100% of the distribution.
image de profil
@Wealth-Accelerator ok if you say so. I still think that the advantages of the accumulator have disappeared with the VPA. And I don't think the dividends are wrong as motivation, at the end of the day everything has to be taxed anyway.

And to take advantage of the FSA, the distributors are not wrong either. After all, if the accumulator has yielded zero % at the end of the year, selling it and buying it immediately, as is sometimes suggested, does nothing to utilize the tax-free allowance, as no profits have been made. The FSA is always utilized (in part or in full) in the case of distributors.
image de profil
@ScorpionfromBW
All good 😉
Just wanted to point this out. You're in the driver's seat 👍🏼
Participez à la conversation