In this post I’m sharing with you my Watchlist. Stocks that I would like to buy if the price is right. What is your opinion on this watchlist? Feel free to share yours with me and everyone too.
Discussion sur FICO
Postes
26Fear of regulation causes home loan appraisers to plummet
My dears, politicians are once again dictating the price of a share.
Is this a buying opportunity for you, or rather a reason to flee the stock?
The share price of the rating company Fair Isaac has plummeted. The trigger should also make the rest of the US real estate sector sit up and take notice.
In simple terms, the rating company Fair Isaac (Fico) is the Schufa of the American real estate market. If Americans want a home loan from their bank, their Fico rating determines whether they get it. This prominent position was Fair Isaac's undoing on Wednesday: the company's share price plummeted by 15.74 percent. The worst daily performance in the broad S&P 500 index. What happened?
Owning your own home is an integral part of the American dream, which is why US politicians are keeping an eagle eye on the real estate market. According to the US Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), demand for loans slumped by 5.1 percent last week compared to the previous week. Chief economist Mike Fratantoni blamed this on the high interest rates on home loans.
For Bill Pulte, Director of the US Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the development must have struck a nerve. The head of the agency first vented his anger at an MBA event and then on Platform X: "After the hard work of many great senators, including Senator Tim Scott, I am extremely disappointed with Fico's cost increases for American consumers." Fair Isaac's share price subsequently plummeted.
According to reports, Pulte was particularly upset by the credit rating agency's decision in November. At that time, Fair Isaac had raised the fee for granting mortgage loans from 3.50 dollars to 4.95 dollars. An increase of more than 40 percent.
The head of the authority also indicated that he wants to resume the FHFA's efforts to change the regulation of credit ratings. Since 2022, the authority has been planning to adjust the rules for homebuilders so that they only have to provide two credit ratings instead of three. This plan is viewed critically in the real estate industry as it is considered less meaningful. For Fair Isaac, on the other hand, it could mean a cut in fee revenue.
But why are investors so sensitive to the statements of a head of authority? One reason could be that this is not the first time that politicians have explicitly blamed Fico for the situation on the US real estate market. In a letter to the US Department of Justice in June last year, Republican Senator Josh Hawley accused Fico of using his dominant market position to drive up prices and called for the antitrust authorities to intervene.



FICO
What is happening with $FICO (-0,13 %) ?
Fair Isaac stock slumps further after FHFA director comments on FICO
May 21, 2025 11:16 AM ETFair Isaac Corporation (FICO) StockEFX, FNMA, FMCC, TRUBy: Liz Kiesche, SA News Editor1 Comment
Play
(4min)
credit score concept on the screen of smartphone
anyaberkut
Updates stock price at 11:14 AM ET and adds comments from Jefferies analyst.
Fair Isaac (NYSE:FICO) stock sank 15% in Wednesday morning trading, following an 8% decline on Tuesday, after Federal Housing Finance Agency director William J. Pulte called for the provider of credit scores to be more "economical" and for the privatization of Fannie Mae (OTCQB:FNMA) and Freddie Mac (OTCQB:FMCC).
Pulte specifically referred to Fair Isaac (NYSE:FICO) and its price increase for mortgage scores during Q&A at a mortgage industry conference on Tuesday. "I think FICO should make sure they’re being as economical as possible," he said. "We’re actively looking at getting it done. I don’t like some things I’ve heard in terms of the cost."
Both Oppenheimer and Jefferies issued notes defending FICO.
Jefferies advised clients to buy the dip. "We continue to believe there is no material risk to FICO's long-term goal of increasing its share of economics within mortgage," analyst Surinder Thind wrote in a note to clients.
Pulte also proposed transitioning to a two-credit bureau report format from the current three-bureau, or tri-merge, format. The proposal is an option for lenders, not a requirement, noted Oppenheimer analyst Owen Lau, who believes that investors are overreacting to the comments.
The comment on making FICO more economical centers on the company's price increase on FICO mortgage scores to $4.95 per score in January 2025. Lau noted that the cost of the score only accounts for 25 basis points of the average mortgage closing cost of $6,000 and is the lowest compared with other costs such as tax stamp, appraisal, title insurance, and notary fees. "We believe FICO still has a strong argument for the price increase," he said. "It is unclear on what FHFA can do to limit FICO's price increase."
The privatization of Fannie Mae (OTCQB:FNMA) and Freddie Mac (OTCQB:FMCC), meanwhile, could open up credit score companies to more competition. But it would likely have little impact on FICO Score pricing, because it is so embedded in the mortgage lending and securitization processes, the analyst said. The score is reflected in 90%+ market shares in all public asset-backed securitization products.
Regarding the option for a bi-merge report, instead of tri-merge, the Oppenheimer analyst doesn't expect that most lenders will switch to two credit bureaus as it would reduce originations and increase consumer costs. TransUnion (TRU), a FICO competitor, has estimated that if 5% of all new mortgage applications use bi-merge reports, ~600K of those mortgages could result in higher interest rates with consumers paying $6,600 higher interest payments over the next 10 years.
Jefferies' Thind agrees that there's little likelihood a transition to bi-merge would significantly affect FICO, pointing to pushback from the Mortgage Bankers Association, five other industry groups, and several Republican senators who want to codify the tri-merge report into law. "If the bi-merge were implemented and all lenders adopted it, our calculations suggest the maximum negative impact to FICO, EFX, and TRU adj EPS would be roughly -16%, -10%, and -10%, respectively," the analyst wrote.
Openheimer's Lau's overall view of FICO's (NYSE:FICO) stock decline: "There are still a lot of details that have to be flushed out, but the knee-jerk reaction to Director Pulte's comments seems excessive. FICO Scores hold strong inherent value and remain integral to the mortgage lending ecosystem."
Lau has Outperform ratings on Fair Issac (FICO), Equifax (EFX), and TransUnion (TRU).
Equifax (EFX) stock fell 5.7%, and TransUnion (TRU) slid 5.9%.
Update North America Top X Compounder
$DHR (-0,39 %)
$AJG (+0,02 %)
$FICO (-0,13 %)
$TPL
$TYL (-0,2 %)
$CSU (+0,32 %)
$PH (-0,17 %)
$ROP (-0,18 %)
$HEI (-0,55 %)
$TDG (-0,08 %) have now published all their earnings, so a little update. Some could be summarized better than others, I hope the formatting is still bearable.
The Wikifolio https://www.wikifolio.com/de/de/w/wf000natxc has so far reached the necessary capital reservations and the general reservations are already 7/10. If one of you is one of them, I would like to thank you very much for the trust you have placed in me.
The next major update will probably come at the end of the next earnings season.
Danaher Q1 2025
- Sales: $5.74 billion -1%
- GAAP net income: $1.0 billion
- Operating Profit Margin: 29.6% -50bps
- GAAP EPS: $1,32 -2,1%
- Segment sales: Biotechnology: +7%, Life Sciences: -4%, Diagnostics: -1.5%
Only the year-end report will probably be really interesting
Constellation Software Q1 2025
- Turnover: USD 2.65 bn, +13 %
- Earnings per share: USD 5.44 (previous year: USD 4.95) - Net profit: USD 115 million
- Free cash flow (FCFA2S): USD 510 million, +14 %
- Operating cash flow: USD 827 million, +12%
- Acquisitions: USD 94 million invested, plus USD 39 million in outstanding payments
- Strategic investment: 9.99 % in Asseco Poland acquired for USD 174 million
- Outlook: Continued moderate, profitable growth expected
TransDigm Q2 2025
- Turnover: USD 2.15 billion, +12% year-on-year
- Net profit: USD 479 million, +19%
- Adjusted earnings per share (EPS): USD 9.11, +14 %
- EBITDA (adjusted): USD 1.16 billion, +14%, margin: 54.0%
- Operating cash flow: USD 900 million, +4 %
- Share buy-backs: USD 184 million in the quarter
HEICO Q1 2025
- Net sales: USD 1.03 billion, +15% year-on-year
- Net result: USD 168 million, +46% - Earnings per share: USD 1.20
- Operating result: USD 226.8 million, +26% - operating margin: 22.0
- EBITDA: USD 273.9 million, +22 %
- Flight Support Group (FSG): Sales: USD 713.2 million +15 %, operating result: USD 166.1 million +22 %
- Electronic Technologies Group (ETG): Sales: USD 330.3 million +16 %, operating result: USD 76.5 million +38 %
- Three acquisitions completed, including 90% of Millennium International (avionics repairs)
- Exclusive license and assets acquired from Honeywell for Boeing 777 and 737NG product lines
Parker-Hannifin Q3 2025
- Sales: USD 5.0 billion, organic growth of 1% year-on-year
- Net profit: USD 961 million, +32%
- Adjusted net profit: USD 904 million, +6%
- Earnings per share (EPS): USD 7.37, +33 %
- Adjusted EPS: USD 6.94, +7%
- Segment operating margin: 23.2 %, +170 basis points
- Adjusted segment operating margin: 26.3%, +160 basis points
- Operating cash flow (YTD): USD 2.3 billion, +8%
- Share buybacks: USD 650 million in the quarter
FICO Q2 2025
- Revenue: $498.7m. +15 % compared to previous year
- GAAP net result: $162.6m +25%
- GAAP EPS: $6,59 +27%
- Operating cash flow: $74.9m +5.5%
- Free cash flow (non-GAAP): $65.5m +6.3%
- Scores segment (B2B + B2C): Revenue: $297.0m +25%
- Software segment: Sales: $201.7m +2%
Arthur J. Gallagher Q1 2025
- Turnover (before reimbursements)3.68 billion USD +14.6 %
- Net income (GAAP)708.9 million USD +5.7 %
- Adjusted net resultUSD 1.08 billion +28.7 %
- Brokerage segmentSales: USD 3.31 billion +17.5%, net result: USD 816.1 million +25%
- Risk Management segmentSales: USD 373.4 million +5.8%, net result: USD 41.1 million +4.6%
- Corporate segmentUSD -148.3 million
- Acquisitions11 acquisitions in Q1 2025 with estimated annual sales of around USD 100 million.
Tyler Technologies Q1 2025
- Revenue: $565.2 million +10%
- GAAP operating profit: $89.2m +33,1 %
- GAAP net income: $81.1m +49,6 %
- GAAP EPS: $1,84 → +49,6 %
- Free cash flow: $48.3m -15,6 %
- Subscription revenue: $375.0m +19,7 %
- SaaS revenue: $180.1m +21 %
- Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR): $1.5 bn +20 %
- SaaS share of new software contract value: 96 %
Roper Technologies Q1 2025
- Revenue: $1.88 billion +12 %
- Adjusted EBITDA: $521 million +12 %
- Adjusted earnings per share: $4.74 USD +11%
- Software & Information Services: +14 %
- Industry & Medical Technology: +10 %
- Share of recurring revenue: >70%
- CentralReach acquisition
Texas Pacific Land Q1 2025
- Revenue: $196.0m +12%
- Net profit: $120.7m +5%
- Earnings per share: $5,24 +5,5%
- EBITDA: $169.4m +11%
- Free cash flow: $126.6m +10.5%
- Oil and gas production: 31,100 barrels of oil equivalent per day - company record
- Water segment revenue: $69.4m - also a record
All companies except Danaher, which is still undergoing restructuring, delivered solid quarterly results. I was particularly impressed by $TYL (-0,2 %)
$FICO (-0,13 %)
$HEI (-0,55 %)
$PH (-0,17 %) and $TDG (-0,08 %) particularly liked. The dear @Tenbagger2024 also shared a great article on Transdigm, which you can find in the comments. $CSU (+0,32 %) and $TPL (-0,7 %) are expected to show stronger growth towards the end of Q3, which is related to the acquisition speed, especially I hope the $TPL (-0,7 %) acquires new flats.
If you are interested in a detailed earnings review on $TPL (-0,7 %) just write a comment.
Enjoy the nice weather <3

North America Top X Compounders
Disclaimer: the portfolio here is only for visualization on Getquin, after the hint of @Epi
I decided to create the whole thing as a wikifolio. Since I am planning to invest in the whole thing myself, I am of course happy about every reservation <3.
Wikifolio: https://www.wikifolio.com/de/de/w/wf000natxc
First of all, this is a short presentation of the companies, I will post more detailed articles in the coming days/weeks, otherwise this would go beyond the scope of this article. I look forward to your questions :)
I hope the formatting is ok so far.
The portfolio focuses on:
- Companies with strong economic moats (market leadership, high switching costs, unique assets and mission-critical products).
- Scalable business models with high/stable margins and strong free cash flow that can be efficiently reinvested (without innovation).
- Management teams with proven capital allocation skills and long-term incentives.
- long-term shareholder value
The Holdings:
Texas Pacific Land Corporation $TPL (-0,7 %)
Texas Pacific Land Corporation, based in Texas, is one of the largest private landowners in Texas with approximately 880,000 acres in the Permian Basin. Founded in 1888 from the bankruptcy of the Texas and Pacific Railway, TPL generates revenue from oil and gas royalties, water rights, land leases and infrastructure services without being directly involved in exploration or production.
- Passive, high-margin modelTPL earns royalties from oil and gas production, land leases (solar, wind, pipelines, data centers, Bitcoin mining and many others) and water management (sales and purification), often with operating margins of over 70% as there are virtually no operating costs.
- Scalable growthIncreasing energy production in the Permian Basin drives royalty income without major reinvestment; water rights and infrastructure provide additional prime sources of growth.
- Capital-light modelLow investment requirements enable high payouts (dividends, share buybacks) while participating in rising commodity prices. In addition, land continues to be purchased which contributes to long-term value creation. TPL also has no debt.
- Historical performanceTPL has achieved annualized returns of ~20% over the last 10 years, driven by increasing energy demand and diversification.
- Unique "Moat": Owning non-replicable land in the Permian Basin creates an unassailable competitive advantage.
- Robust cash flowsRoyalty-based revenues are largely protected from operational risks and provide stability.
- Disciplined managementManagement has diversified the business model through water and infrastructure services and remains lean and efficient. Future focus on data centers (the Permian Basin is considered the ultimate hotspot for data centers in the US)
- Shareholder returnsUse of high free cash flows for dividends, special dividends and share buybacks to increase value per share.
Constellation Software $CSU (+0,32 %)
Constellation Software, based in Canada, acquires, manages and develops vertical market software (VMS) serving niches such as local government, healthcare and financial services. With a decentralized model, it has acquired hundreds of small software companies worldwide and is considered the perfect compounder.
- Serial acquisitionsConstellation acquires small, cash-flowing VMS companies (typically USD 5-10m revenue) at attractive valuations, which enables consistent growth (~15-20% annualized returns since IPO in 2006).
- High returns on capitalAcquired companies generate stable, high-margin cash flows, which are reinvested in further acquisitions, creating a compounding effect.
- Stable revenuesVMS products have high switching costs and recurring revenues, which ensures predictability.
- Economic "moat"High switching costs and fragmented competitors in VMS markets protect against competition.
- Decentralized managementAutonomy for acquired companies promotes agility and efficiency.
- Outstanding leadershipFounder Mark Leonard is recognized as a master of capital allocation, with a focus on high ROIC acquisitions:
- Organic growthImprovement of acquired companies through cross-selling, price adjustments and product development.
- Capital efficiencyLow debt and reinvestment of cash flows in acquisitions rather than dividends to maximize long-term growth.
Heico Corporation $HEI (-0,55 %)
Heico, based in Florida, is a leading manufacturer of aerospace and defense components, especially spare parts and repair services. It also serves niches in electronics and medical technology and is growing through acquisitions and organic expansion.
- Consistent outperformanceHeico has delivered ~18% annualized returns since 1987, driven by high-margin aerospace parts and strategic acquisitions.
- Acquisition-driven growthAcquisition of complementary companies to expand product offering and geographic reach. Over 70 acquisitions since 1995 have expanded market share in niche aerospace and defense markets.
- Stable demandGlobal growth and modernization in aviation, defense spending as well as the absolute necessity for repairs ensure long-term demand.
- Regulatory "Moat"Strict certifications (e.g. FAA) create high barriers to entry.
- Cost advantage and niche dominanceFocus on high-margin, mission-critical aviation components with limited competition. Heico's spare parts are often cheaper than OEM parts, which secures market share with high margins.
- Family-led management: The Mendelson family ensures long-term focus and discipline.
TransDigm Group $TDG (-0,08 %)
TransDigm, based in Ohio, designs and manufactures specialized components for commercial and military aircraft, focusing on proprietary products with high margins and low competition. It is growing through acquisitions and pricing power.
- Excellent returnsTransDigm has generated ~24% annualized returns since 2007, driven by acquisitions, margin expansion and share buybacks.
- High-margin business: Mission critical products (e.g. actuators, sensors) enable pricing power and operating margins of over 40%.
- Capital allocationFree cash flow is used for acquisitions, debt reduction and shareholder returns, which increases the value per share.
- Value-enhancing M&AAcquisition of niche manufacturers, margin improvement through cost reduction and integration.
- Strong "Moat"High switching costs and regulatory barriers (e.g. FAA certifications) protect the market position.
- Pricing powerProprietary products with few competitors allow consistent price increases.
- Proven managementCEO Nick Howley has a disciplined acquisition strategy and is focused on shareholder value.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation $PH (-0,17 %)
Parker-Hannifin, based in Ohio, is a global leader in motion and control technologies, including hydraulics, pneumatics and filtration systems for industries such as aerospace, automotive and manufacturing.
- Steady growthParker-Hannifin has achieved ~12% annualized returns over the past two decades, driven by diversification and acquisitions.
- High margins: Focus on high-quality, technical products ensures strong profitability.
- Capital allocationFree cash flow supports acquisitions, dividends (over 50 years of growth) and buybacks.
- Strategic acquisitions: Expansion of product lines and geographic presence through bolt-on acquisitions (e.g. Meggitt 2022).
- Market leadershipParker dominates niche markets in drive technology with a broad product portfolio.
- Diversified end markets: Exposure in aerospace, industry and energy reduces cyclical risks.
- Innovative strength: Investments in IoT, electrification and sustainable technologies ensure future growth.
- Operational efficiency: Use of lean manufacturing and cost discipline to secure high margins and finance growth.
Fair Isaac Corporation $FICO (-0,13 %)
Fair Isaac, based in California, is known for the FICO score, the leading credit scoring system in the US. It also provides analytics software and decision-making tools for industries such as banking, insurance and healthcare.
- Stable growthFICO Score generates predictable, recurring revenue while the software segment is growing at double-digit rates (~15% annualized returns over the last 10 years).
- High marginsSoftware and scoring services have low variable costs, enabling operating margins of over 30%.
- Long-term relevance: Credit risk assessment and analytics are essential for the financial industry.
- Dominant "Moat"FICO score has a quasi-monopoly position in the US with high switching costs for lenders.
- Innovation leadership: Investments in AI, machine learning and cloud analytics ensure future growth:
- Software expansion: Expansion of decision management software (e.g. fraud detection, customer analytics) to diversify revenues.
- Global reach: Expansion of scoring and analytics solutions into international markets.
Danaher Corporation $DHR (-0,39 %)
Danaher, headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a diversified conglomerate focused on life sciences, diagnostics and environmental solutions. It utilizes the Danaher Business System (DBS), a lean-based management framework, to drive efficiency and growth.
- Outstanding track recordDanaher has achieved ~26% annualized returns since 1978, driven by acquisitions and operational excellence.
- High returns on capitalDBS optimizes acquired businesses, increasing margins and cash flows for reinvestment.
- Resilient markets: Exposure to life sciences and diagnostics ensures stable, long-term demand.
- Market leadershipDanaher is a leader in niches such as laboratory equipment (e.g. Beckman Coulter) and diagnostics (e.g. Cepheid).
- Diversified portfolioBroad exposure reduces dependence on individual markets. Continuous reinvention and further development of the company, positioning Danaher for long-term growth:
- Strategic acquisitionsAcquisition of high-quality life sciences and diagnostics companies, integration with DBS to enhance performance.
- Operational excellence: Use of DBS to increase margins, reduce costs and accelerate growth.
- Innovation focus: Investing in research and development for cutting-edge technologies in genomics, diagnostics and environmental technologies.
Roper Technologies $ROP (-0,18 %)
Roper Technologies, based in Florida, is a diversified technology company that provides software and hardware solutions for niche markets such as healthcare, energy and education. It is growing through acquisitions and organic expansion.
- Consistent growthRoper has delivered ~15% annualized returns over the last two decades through disciplined acquisitions and stable cash flows.
- High-margin businesses: Software and services generate recurring revenues with margins in excess of 30%.
- Capital efficiencyStrong cash flows finance acquisitions and dividends with high ROIC.
- Niche leadershipRoper dominates fragmented markets with high switching costs (e.g. healthcare software, water management systems).
- Strong management: Management excels at identifying and integrating high value acquisitions.
- Recurring revenuesSubscription-based software models ensure predictable cash flows.
- M&AAcquisition of market-leading companies in high-margin niche markets with stable demand.
- Organic growth: Improvement of acquired companies through product innovation and market expansion.
- Shareholder focus: Balance between acquisitions, consistent dividend growth and opportunistic buybacks.
Tyler Technologies $TYL (-0,2 %)
Tyler Technologies, based in Texas, is the leading provider of software solutions for the US public sector, serving municipalities, courts, schools and other government agencies. Its platforms digitize administrative processes.
- Stable growthTyler has achieved ~15% annualized returns over the last 10 years, driven by the digitization of the public sector.
- Recurring revenueSubscription-based software contracts provide stable, high-margin cash flows.
- Scalable model: New solutions can be rolled out to the large customer base with minimal additional costs:
- Market dominanceTyler is a leader in the public sector software market, with high switching costs for customers.
- Economic "Moat"Long-term government contracts and regulatory complexity keep competitors at bay. Deep integration into customer processes minimizes churn.
- Focus on the public sector: Expansion of software offering (e.g. court management, tax systems) to meet growing digitization needs.
- SaaS transformation: Conversion of customers to cloud-based, subscription-based models for higher recurring revenues and margins.
- Strategic acquisitions: Acquisition of complementary software providers to expand the offering and customer base.
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. $AJG (+0,02 %)
Arthur J. Gallagher, based in Illinois, is a global insurance broker and risk management services provider offering customized insurance solutions and advice to businesses and individuals.
- Stable growthGallagher has achieved ~14% annualized returns over the past 10 years, driven by acquisitions and organic growth in the stable insurance sector.
- Recurring revenues: Commission-based income from insurance renewals ensures predictable cash flows.
- Acquisition-driven expansion: Acquisition of small and mid-sized brokers to expand geographic and product reach.
- High return on investmentAcquisitions of small brokers generate immediate cash flows that are reinvested with attractive returns.
- Organic growthDeepen customer relationships through cross-selling and specialized risk management services.
- Scalable modelGallagher's platform enables efficient integration of acquired brokers, expanding client base and capabilities.
- Regulatory "Moat"Complex insurance regulations and client relationships create barriers to entry.
- Strong managementLeadership has a proven track record of disciplined acquisitions and organic growth.
- Operational efficiency: Optimizing operations to maintain high margins and finance further acquisitions.
The portfolio achieves the broadest possible diversification with targeted exposure to first-class compounders. Through acquisition strategies, the companies increasingly cover more and more niches within a sector, which simultaneously promotes diversification and growth.
I know that there are a few companies that would also fit in here, but I particularly wanted to include some that are less well known and not represented in most portfolios. For example, most people here already have Berkshire, Mastercard, Visa or other tech companies in their portfolios anyway.
The portfolio is not a standalone, or rather I see it as an addition to specifically bring compounders (which are also partly uninteresting for "beginners" due to the high share price) into the portfolio and thus directly overweight them, since as far as I know they are also underweighted in every ETF and therefore cannot provide any real added value.
If you want to invest in the Wikifolio, a share should have a weighting of >30% and will be rebalanced.
I am curious about the new ETF from @lawinvest let's see if we have a chance against the Ultimate Homer @Simpson have a chance against the Ultimate Homer.



+ 5

All values for the project
"We are building an ETF"
Time to buy: My top 30 companies that I am particularly looking at in the current crash
It is now slowly becoming clear who has what it takes to make good profits in the coming years.
Here are my top 30 companies by category, which I am particularly looking at in the current crash.
Some are still overvalued, others are already very attractive at the current price level.
Tier 1 (high corporate quality and strong growth)
Airbnb $ABNB (-0,23 %)
Alphabet $GOOGL (-0,23 %)
Amazon $AMZN (-0,53 %)
ASML $ASML (-2,08 %)
Axon $AXON (-0,36 %)
Cadence $CDNS (-0,19 %)
Constellation Software $CSU (+0,32 %)
Crowdstrike $CRWD (-0,23 %)
Fair Isaac $FICO (-0,13 %)
Hermes $RMS (-0,46 %)
Intuit $INTU (-0,27 %)
Intuitive Surgical $ISRG (+0,18 %)
Mastercard $MA (+0,2 %)
Meta $META (-0,37 %)
Netflix $NFLX (-0,04 %)
Microsoft $MSFT (-0,09 %)
Palantir $PLTR (-0,1 %)
Tesla $TSLA (-0,28 %)
Tier-2 (high business quality and moderate growth)
Booking $BKNG (-0,26 %)
Costco $COST (+0,01 %)
Ferrari $RACE (-0,41 %)
Moody's $MCO (-0,24 %)
MSCI $MSCI (-0,24 %)
Transdigm $TDG (-0,08 %)
Tier-3 (medium / solid corporate quality and strong growth)
Hims & Hers $HIMS (+0,17 %)
Robinhood $HOOD (+0,71 %)
Roblox $RBLX
Shopify $SHOP (-0,51 %)
Spotify $SPOT (-0,29 %)
The Trade Desk $TTD (-0,5 %)
I bought on Friday and am buying again today - even in the course of the next few days and weeks, when we could probably see even lower prices.
Where are you buying?
The only list you need: The top 24 companies I look out for in the correction process
Airbnb $ABNB (-0,23 %)
Amazon $AMZN (-0,53 %)
Axon $AXON (-0,36 %)
Cadence $CDNS (-0,19 %)
Constellation Software $CSU (+0,32 %)
Costco $COST (+0,01 %)
Crowdstrike $CRWD (-0,23 %)
Fair Isaac $FICO (-0,13 %)
Ferrari $RACE (-0,41 %)
Hermes $RMS (-0,46 %)
Hims & Hers $HIMS (+0,17 %)
Intuit $INTU (-0,27 %)
Intuitive Surgical $ISRG (+0,18 %)
Mastercard $MA (+0,2 %)
Microsoft $MSFT (-0,09 %)
Moody's $MCO (-0 %)
MSCI $MSCI (-0,24 %)
Palantir $PLTR (-0,1 %)
Robinhood $HOOD (+0,71 %)
Roblox $RBLX
Shopify $SHOP (-0,51 %)
Tesla $TSLA (-0,28 %)
The Trade Desk $TTD (-0,5 %)
Transdigm $TDG (-0,08 %)
Select a maximum of 8-10 positions from this list that have the best risk/reward ratio and are reasonably valued. Then there is a good chance of outperforming the S&P 500.
Your opinion?
Interesting drawdowns for these 10 quality stocks
Drawdowns from the 52-week high:
Nvidia: -20% $NVDA (-0,3 %)
Fair Isaac: -23% $FICO (-0,13 %)
Synopsys: -26% $SNPS (-0,17 %)
Axon Enterprise: -27% $AXON (-0,36 %)
ASML: -33% $ASML (-2,08 %)
Novo Nordisk: -38% $NOVO B (-1,4 %)
Tesla: -42% $TSLA (-0,28 %)
Coinbase: -42% $COIN (+0,68 %)
Trade Desk: -50% $TTD (-0,5 %)
AMD: -54% $AMD (-0,37 %)
Have the companies already reached interesting levels for you to enter / buy or are they still too expensive despite the drawdown?
10 listed companies with the highest pricing power
ASML $ASML (-2,08 %) (semiconductor equipment)
Visa $V (-0,25 %) (payment transactions)
Mastercard $MA (+0,2 %) (payment transactions)
Moody's $MCO (-0,24 %) (credit ratings)
S&P Global $SPGI (+0,03 %) (credit ratings and indices)
Hermès $RMS (-0,46 %) (luxury goods)
Fair Isaac Corporation $FICO (-0,13 %) (credit scoring)
Coca-Cola $KO (+0,11 %) (beverages)
Apple $AAPL (-0,27 %) (consumer electronics and technology)
Nvidia $NVDA (-0,3 %) (AI and GPUs)
Also also worth mentioningbut not in the top 10:
Transdigm $TDG (-0,08 %) (aerospace)
MSCI $MSCI (-0,24 %) (financial services)
Cadence $CDNS (-0,19 %) (EDA software)
Synopsys $SNPS (-0,17 %) (EDA software)
Ferrari $RACE (+0,02 %) (luxury cars)
What do you think? Have I forgotten an interesting company / share?
Fair Isaac Corp.: 1st quarter profit rises, but misses estimates
WASHINGTON (dpa-AFX) - Fair Isaac Corp (FICO) has reported first-quarter earnings that beat last year's but missed Wall Street estimates.
The company's profit amounted to 152.53 million dollars, or 6.14 dollars per share. In the previous year, it was 121.07 million dollars or 4.80 dollars per share.
Excluding special items, Fair Isaac Corp. reported adjusted earnings of 143.79 million dollars, or 5.79 dollars per share, for the period.
Analysts on average had expected earnings of 6.08 dollars per share. Analysts' estimates generally exclude special items.
The company's turnover rose by 15.2 percent to 439.97 million dollars in the reporting period compared to 382.06 million dollars in the previous year.
Fair Isaac Corp. earnings at a glance (GAAP):
-Net income: 152.53 million dollars compared to 121.07 million dollars in the prior year. -Earnings per share: $6.14 compared to $4.80 in the prior year. -Sales: USD 439.97 million compared to USD 382.06 million in the previous year.
-Forecast : Profit forecast for the full year: USD 28.58 Sales forecast for the full year: USD 1.98 billion
Copyright(c) 2025 RTTNews.com. All rights reserved

Titres populaires
Meilleurs créateurs cette semaine