Thank you for explaining my approach with the stability anchor. Of course, this is only suitable as a counterweight for a very small number of investors with a very high risk factor.
Have a nice weekend. Looking forward to the next challenge month and hoping for a bit more excitement. Preferably in which your wikis perform better and not my share worse.😉😂
Have a nice weekend. Looking forward to the next challenge month and hoping for a bit more excitement. Preferably in which your wikis perform better and not my share worse.😉😂
•
1111
•
@Multibagger @Epi I disagree here, at least in part.
I have a boring world ETF portfolio as my core and a mini-small satellite with single stock momentum running alongside it.
It is precisely this satellite that I have decided to smooth with 3xGTAA. I want this satellite to be risky and offer high expected returns. So even for "Uncle Edeltraut" with a core satellite approach, this is a very interesting combination for the satellite 😉👍🏼
Thanks @Epi for the update!
I have a boring world ETF portfolio as my core and a mini-small satellite with single stock momentum running alongside it.
It is precisely this satellite that I have decided to smooth with 3xGTAA. I want this satellite to be risky and offer high expected returns. So even for "Uncle Edeltraut" with a core satellite approach, this is a very interesting combination for the satellite 😉👍🏼
Thanks @Epi for the update!
•
33
•
6D
@Wealth-Accelerator Consent. You have a clearly defined risk share. Within this, 3xGTAA can make sense.
Aunt Else already drops out at the risk part.
Aunt Else already drops out at the risk part.
•
22
•