Very interesting 👍🏻 Personally I see it a bit different and history shows that you can't achieve anything with good will and voluntarism. Sometimes the state has to help with strict rules and laws to make something happen. (Examples: compulsory seat belts, KAT etc.) The market goes by efficiency and why should you offer expensive and inefficient e-fuels when the state still allows normal diesel? 🤷🏼♂️ (Simple example.)
•
66
•
@Staatsmann I see it exactly the same way. In addition, there is great potential in these areas, since taxes such as Co2 or others are eliminated. Also, the types of energy are usually much more efficient and cost cheaper if you would first produce them in proper measures. Therefore, subsidy regulation or investment in such areas would be good.
••
@Canibo I had once written posts about this: Nuclear energy and coal energy are only so cheap because they are extremely subsidized... And of course indirect subsidies are added, such as the risk with nuclear power plants. The state pays for the nuclear waste, is responsible for the disposal and bears the risk for a GAU and the demolition of the power plant.
•
11
•