Deleted User
3Yr
Comment was deleted
@Metaverse So son of a bitch and other insults are normal for you. How do you justify that? Is your everyday behavior like that? How much success do you have with it?
•
22
•Deleted User
3Yr
Comment was deleted
@Metaverse Childish? Sorry... the behavior of a 31 year old Monchella is childish. The comments on MSW after her "glorious" exit alone are more than enough proof that mental maturity is required in some areas.
I asked you two simple questions, the meaning of which you are obviously unable to reflect on or answer adequately.
At no point was it about Hebelhuberta's statement, but about the words used to describe the people here. You'd better go to your play corner before you play the virtual diva here. Half-strong no more no less...
You want to be clearer? Great, let's start the games.
Your "statement" is not a statement, but a continuation of nonsense. The dividend strategy doesn't seem to play a role in your limited horizon, but to dismiss it as nonsense is more than childish, unreflective and stupid chatter. Your statement "someone would have been deleted because of the criticism" is the "reasoning" of a small child. It shows that you have not understood the basic rules of human interaction and the exchange of opinions.
What is another principle of freedom? "My freedom can only go as far as it does not restrict the freedom of others." So if you want to discuss what's "wrong" here, go ahead. I also have dozens of ideas and
suggestions... but I'm sure this won't be new either: "In all arguments, tone plays an important role in understanding and the choice of words in order to be accepted as an argument." And since we have heard no more sound from the Internet apart from the 56kb modem, what remains is understanding and the nature of the writing itself, i.e. the use or non-use of certain words. Understanding this is really not difficult.
Hence the question again: How far will you get in life, business or private, if you use such words?
I asked you two simple questions, the meaning of which you are obviously unable to reflect on or answer adequately.
At no point was it about Hebelhuberta's statement, but about the words used to describe the people here. You'd better go to your play corner before you play the virtual diva here. Half-strong no more no less...
You want to be clearer? Great, let's start the games.
Your "statement" is not a statement, but a continuation of nonsense. The dividend strategy doesn't seem to play a role in your limited horizon, but to dismiss it as nonsense is more than childish, unreflective and stupid chatter. Your statement "someone would have been deleted because of the criticism" is the "reasoning" of a small child. It shows that you have not understood the basic rules of human interaction and the exchange of opinions.
What is another principle of freedom? "My freedom can only go as far as it does not restrict the freedom of others." So if you want to discuss what's "wrong" here, go ahead. I also have dozens of ideas and
suggestions... but I'm sure this won't be new either: "In all arguments, tone plays an important role in understanding and the choice of words in order to be accepted as an argument." And since we have heard no more sound from the Internet apart from the 56kb modem, what remains is understanding and the nature of the writing itself, i.e. the use or non-use of certain words. Understanding this is really not difficult.
Hence the question again: How far will you get in life, business or private, if you use such words?
•
11
•