profile image
But if I understand correctly, the results of the past are projected into the future, right? This means that ten-baggers corresponding to your name will perform rather poorly in the tool, or am I making a mistake?
profile image
@Multibagger
Yes, my dear, what happened in the past does not have to continue in the future. But you can assume that these are quality companies. Which have proven to be successful over several years. Which have continued to grow over the years. Because some of them have a moat. They have understood how to build up a business model, sometimes independently of the competition. In some cases, they have patents, blockbusters or almost a monopoly. Thanks to their moat, some of these companies are already unassailable. And will remain so in the future
profile image
@Tenbagger2024 I was aware of that, but in the case of Microsoft, for example, I don't need a tool for that. But if you now analyze smaller stocks with lower MK and history, they will always have a poor ranking, although the growth and thus possible price increases are higher than for top stocks like Microsoft. That's the only thing I wanted to say.
profile image
@Multibagger
But Corcept, Mensch und Maschine, Tetra Tech and IES Holding are not the big companies you have on your radar. And you will find that many small companies also do well in the ranking
1