profile image
I don't know how big your MSCI World position is. But €50 a month? And for Mcs, P&g and Pepsi also 50€ each?

I don't think these stocks are a better investment in the medium to long term. Especially as they are in the World anyway. And just because of the dividend? I don't know.
14
profile image
@xzxzx I agree. Apart from Visa, no other share is currently outperforming a global fund.
profile image
@xzxzx My MSCI World currently accounts for 39% of my portfolio. Mcs, P&G and Pepsi currently between 1.6 and 1.9% each, so I don't see a problem there.
I agree with the share price growth, but an MSCI World does not pay a dividend of 2-3% (and yes, I am aware that the dividends do not cancel out the difference in the charts, but my long-term goal is to create a passive income)
profile image
Even if your goal is passive income, the msci will also have a higher personal dividend yield in real terms due to the greater price gain over time. Even if the dividend yield is well below 3% at the beginning, the personal dividend yield will be far higher later on.
2
profile image
@xzxzx At your age (savings phase) I would put everything into an ETF, e.g. S&P500, and when you're approaching fifty I would think about switching to dividend stocks... Pepsi and co. will give you a very poor return that won't even compensate for inflation over your investment horizon...
1