Deleted User
1Yr
Comment was deleted
@Cype I'm not really worried about that (anymore) :)
What could you do in the worst case? A double spend before it gets noticed and the miners would change the pool...
Here is one of my favorite videos on the 51% attack by Andreas Antonopoulos:
https://x.com/terahash_space/status/1758140363674444211?t=CgXBKYZpLtjIVmOHLo40Iw&s=19
What could you do in the worst case? A double spend before it gets noticed and the miners would change the pool...
Here is one of my favorite videos on the 51% attack by Andreas Antonopoulos:
https://x.com/terahash_space/status/1758140363674444211?t=CgXBKYZpLtjIVmOHLo40Iw&s=19
••
Deleted User
1Yr
Comment was deleted
@Cype That's a good point about the media. The question I'm asking myself right now...
Wouldn't this 51% attack be noticed before the double spend and the miners pull their computing power from the pools?
I mean if suddenly more than half of the total computing power continues to mine offline and creates a longer chain to replace the current one, that would normally be noticed immediately🤔
But very good point from you and your coffee that I will think about :D
Wouldn't this 51% attack be noticed before the double spend and the miners pull their computing power from the pools?
I mean if suddenly more than half of the total computing power continues to mine offline and creates a longer chain to replace the current one, that would normally be noticed immediately🤔
But very good point from you and your coffee that I will think about :D
••