2Mon·

How does the stock market react to US elections? A look into the past 🇺🇲

The US elections are a global event that affects not only the political but also the economic world. As I am looking to invest a larger amount in the S&P500 myself, I have been wondering how the stock markets will perform after a presidential election. Historical data shows some interesting patterns that give us insight into how markets react to election outcomes.


Short-term uncertainty and volatility

Before and immediately after elections, markets often experience a period of heightened volatility. Uncertainty about which political guidelines the new president will implement leads investors to act more cautiously. For example, the unclear election result in 2000 between George W. Bush and Al Gore led to a temporary decline in the S&P 500 until the Supreme Court made a final decision and the market regained stability.


Republican or Democrat - does it make a difference?

Interestingly, both parties have historically delivered positive stock market returns, but the immediate market reaction often differs depending on the party affiliation of the election winner. A Republican victory, as with Donald Trump in 2016, is often associated with pro-business policies, such as tax cuts and less regulation, which can lead to a short-term rise in stock prices. After Trump's election, the S&P 500 gained around 5% in the remaining weeks of 2016 as investors hoped for deregulation and economic stimulus.


Long-term market performance - focus on the economy and monetary policy

While elections undoubtedly have a short to medium-term impact, long-term market performance is more dependent on general economic conditions and monetary policy. Under presidents of both parties - from Obama to Biden, from Bush to Trump - the stock markets recorded positive returns on average. The Federal Reserve's expansionary monetary policy often played a decisive role in this, as low interest rates and bond purchases supported the markets and boosted growth.


Conclusion

The stock market often reacts positively in the short term to the clarification of political uncertainties after elections. In the long term, however, general economic conditions and monetary policy measures are of key importance. Regardless of the president's party affiliation, historical data shows that stock markets can achieve growth under either party.


$VUAG (+0.55%)
$VUSA (+0.55%)
#usa 🇺🇲


https://www.nber.org/

https://www.cfr.org/election2024/candidate-tracker

https://www.cfr.org/

https://www.spglobal.com/en

attachment
21
49 Comments

profile image
A difficult choice, either you elect a former lawyer or a convicted criminal who has led several companies into bankruptcy, recommended that you should inject yourself with disinfectant, against Corona and whose former employees call him a fascist and liar, among other things...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/25/election-trump-staffers-john-kelly
29
profile image
@PowerWordChill people vote differently in the USA. It works, as you can see from our finance minister. And we can also cope with Schlumpf's memory lapses.
3
profile image
@Reinecke I agree, we often focus too much on others. And we're not role models ourselves😂
profile image
@Therapeut Everything exists relative to each other and in a spectrum. Just because not all of our personnel are flawless doesn't mean that everything is bad.

That's just typical whataboutism.
If I ask you not to burn car tires in the garden and you counter by saying that you drive a car with a broken catalytic converter, then
A: both are true
B: both are bad
But
C: both can be bad in different degrees

Thought experiments:
Imagine a person who is maximally unsuitable for a presidential office.
What qualities would this person have?

And then look at Trump.

Markus Söder would probably do even better, albeit narrowly.
🤣
3
profile image
@PowerWordChill Opinions or not.
I celebrate Trump.
Trump stands for
1. economic growth
2. strengthening national security
3. tax reforms
4. trade policy and "America First"
5. strengthening conservative values
6. economic relief for the middle class
7. rejection of excessive bureaucracy
8. strong foreign policy
9. direct communication
9
profile image
@Therapeut reads like the election program of any X-any autocrat. I bet Hitler's / Putin's / Orban's election program looked exactly the same 😅

You also forgot to mention the abolition of independent democratic institutions
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025
7
@Therapeut Do you believe those lies about Trump you listed?

Why are you against democracy? The rule of law? Women's rights? Open-mindedness and tolerance regardless of nationality and sexual orientation? Scientific rigor? Social policy that holds the top 0.1% more accountable in order to offer the 99.9% more social justice.
2
profile image
@ad_absurdum yes, I agree that "you shall judge them by their deeds"

@Therapeut as an example:
5. strengthening conservative values
The guy had sex with a porn star while he was married.

Why should anyone believe a word he says. You could fill books with the demonstrable lies he told.
4
profile image
@PowerWordChill Bill Clinton got a blow job from the intern in his office. How much more can you drag the office into the mud? It's also not about what Trump means for the Germans, he would be the US president and the Americans were doing quite well under Trump.
2
profile image
@Reinecke I didn't claim that Clinton is committed to "strengthening conservative values".

Besides, how do you know that the Americans will be better off under Trump? What do you base this statement on?

All the information we have tends to show that Trump is a security risk. (For us and for the USA)
2
profile image
@PowerWordChill I found it quite chilled under Trump.
4
View all 33 further answers
profile image
More interesting are the BRICS, which have still not given up their parallel currency. This would plunge the FED into a crisis of apocalyptic proportions. The only thing that is even more frightening is that China is expanding its strategic reserves at full speed. If Donald comes to power, then Taiwan is probably due. Donald won't be interested because the USA is pursuing a one-China policy, but Europe will probably sanction it again by remote control. In the long term, the Taiwan Strait will be affected as a shipping route, which could become a problem for Germany in particular.
2
@Reinecke Why Taiwan? They have beautiful girls!!! Please don't let them take them away! 😥
profile image
How would you do it? Will you wait for the election results or buy in installments before and after the election?
1
profile image
@Iwanowitsch I'm actually asking myself this question, I get my salary in a few days and could invest a larger sum at once.
The thing that makes me think is the very good performance of the S&P500 so far this year😂
Vllt in transhen, I'll wait for the week and then choose
profile image
@Therapeut Well, I feel the same way as you and I have the same plan. I had hoped that you had a good or better plan, but since that's not the case, I'll share my disorganized thoughts with you: I read somewhere that when Trump became president last time, stocks went down very briefly (probably like on August 5) and then rose sustainably. I was therefore considering waiting for the election result. But I'm torn about the idea of simply dividing the capital into 6 tranches, for example, and investing one tranche every week from tomorrow.
2
Join the conversation