1Wk·

From outsiders to market powerhouses: How small investors are turning the financial world upside down

Ten years ago, the stock markets were an exclusive playground for banks, fund managers and hedge funds. Small investors? They were mostly spectators who occasionally bought a DAX share and then left it for 20 years. But today? Today they are causing turbulence on Wall Street, driving share prices to absurd heights - and even causing hedge funds worth billions to falter.


From nobodies to market whisperers


In 2015, the stock market world was still clearly divided: Institutional investors had the knowledge, the networks and the capital, while retail investors tended to invest on the side - often blindly on the recommendation of their bank advisor. But that has changed drastically.


Three major factors have fueled this development:


1. trading apps & fee-free trading: thanks to apps such as Trade Republic or Robinhood, anyone can buy shares with just a few clicks - without high fees, without complicated order masks.


2. social media as a stock market advisor: Platforms such as Twitter and YouTube have replaced the traditional financial advisor. Today, trends in social media determine which shares go through the roof.


3. access to knowledge & data: Banks used to have the information advantage. Today, every retail investor has access to analyses, key financial figures and AI-supported trading tools.


GameStop & Co. - How retail investors are rewriting the stock market


Probably the best-known case: $GME .

In 2021, small investors took on hedge funds worth billions who sold the video game retailer's shares short. The online community got organized, drove up the share price and forced the professionals to buy in at a high price. The result? Hedge funds such as Melvin Capital lost billions - David had indeed dealt a blow to Goliath.


It was a similar story with $AMC (-0.04%) .

Actually a movie theater chain on the decline, but thanks to massive buying from the Internet, the share price rose to absurd heights. The small investors didn't care whether it was economically justified or not - they wanted to challenge "the big boys".


German retail investors in 2025 - what makes them tick today


In Germany, we are traditionally more cautious. But a lot has changed here too:


The securities assets of German households are about to break the 2 trillion euro mark - a record.


57.2% of German private investors' financial assets are now invested in ETFs, particularly on the MSCI World or the FTSE All-World.


Most popular stocks? Alongside US giants such as $NVDA (-3.78%) , $MSFT (-1.91%) and $TSLA (-8.56%) many are also betting on current hypes such as $RHM (-2.27%) , $NU (-3.25%) or $HIMS (-2.52%) .


Is this the democratization of the financial markets - or a new bubble?


On the one hand, it's great: private investors have never had as much power as they do today. They are informed, networked and heavily involved. On the other hand, when share prices are no longer determined by company figures but by viral trends, this can be dangerous.


Because in the end, the stock market is still not a casino. Or is it?


What do you think? Are retail investors an asset for the market or more of a risk?

8
11 Comments

profile image
You can analyze the market well using a variety of tools.
Anyone who is serious about investing and is not just here to play roulette can easily determine the risk of pushed stocks and act accordingly.
The greatest danger is the ignorance of the investor himself.
Always following the other sheep is usually not optimal.

You mentioned a few "hype" stocks, so I would like to take a look at $RHM.
I don't think it's appropriate to describe this share as hype.
It is simply a fundamental security for us that affects everyone in the EU.

Small investors like you or me are always an enrichment for the market.
It makes the pie bigger and everyone has a chance to get a bigger slice of it with the right strategy.
‱
2
‱
profile image
@Mark777 do you have any tips or recommendations for the tools you mentioned? lg
‱‱
profile image
@Tobiwankenobi500 I use a mixture of different tools in parallel to better bundle the evaluation.
These include MarketScreener, Tradingview, Gq, Onvista, company websites, TV news, exchange about politics with other people.
‱
3
‱
profile image
@Mark777 If I had to choose a tool, which tool would you prefer from those mentioned?
‱‱
profile image
@spellwan MarketScreener, this tool is not free, but offers extensive possibilities to analyze a stock or other investments in detail.
Of the free tools, I would prefer Trading View.
‱
2
‱
profile image
@Mark777 also suitable for beginners?
‱‱
profile image
@spellwan it's user-friendly and easy to understand, I'm not a professional either, so 👍
‱
1
‱
profile image
Retail investors have not only been relevant on the stock market for the last 10 years. They were also relevant in 1929, 1971, 1987, 2000, 2007 - can you tell?
‱
1
‱
@Epi see certain parallels 😜
‱
1
‱
profile image
As someone who has been in the market since 1987, I cannot support the statements in the article. Even in 1929 the sell-off was caused by "small investors" and the credit squeeze they caused. October 87 the same. 1996-2000 the retail side basically drove the institutional side ahead of them. Funds had to buy at prices that came about through unlimited kamikaze actions. No - the market has always been like this. And - $RHM is not hype. The order books are going through the roof - FPE at 35. That's not hype. Worldcom, EM TV, MobilCom.... that was hype. Biodata....
‱‱
profile image
@gloinvest Gamestop comes to mind
‱‱
Join the conversation