2Yr·

Is it worth reinvesting dividends?

There are several reasons why you might choose a dividend strategy for your portfolio. Regardless of these reasons, an important decision must be made after each dividend distribution: Cash out or reinvest?


The advantage of reinvesting your dividends is that you can grow your capital faster and ultimately receive more dividends. This is because by acquiring more shares in the same company from the distribution, the entitlement to future dividends increases, which in turn makes it possible to acquire even more shares and therefore even more dividends, and so on. In short, reinvesting dividends is a great way to benefit from the compound interest effect. This is particularly advantageous for investors who have a long investment horizon and want to maximize asset growth over this. This effect can be illustrated very well with a small example:


If you had bought shares in Realty Income for €1,000 at the beginning of 2013 (WKN: 899744) there would have been a dividend yield of 4.18% on this investment at that time. This would have increased by an average of 5.26% over the next ten years. Over the same period, the share price would have increased by 4.52% per year. If all dividends received were fully reinvested without any further payment, this would result in a final value of €2,359.

If all dividends received had been consumed over the period, there is a significant difference in the final result. The final value of the investment is "only" €1,553.

As this example shows, dividends should always be reinvested, especially when the portfolio is in the build-up phase.


Note on the calculation example:

I have taken the figures for the dividend yield and increase from DivvyDiary. The calculation (before taxes) was done with the Dividenden-Rechner (2.4) from Aktientraum. As always, past performance is no guarantee of future performance.


How do I actually reinvest my dividends?

In the USA, many companies offer a so-called DRIP program (Dividend Reinvestment Plan), where you receive new shares at the same value instead of a cash amount. In most cases, German brokers do not support this and if they do, it is associated with fees that are disproportionate to the dividend received.

In my portfolio, I have the opportunity to participate in such a DRIP program with Unilever and Diageo. At Trade Republic, this falls under specific client instructions and is associated with costs of €5. This instruction must be applied for individually for each distribution.

As this is too expensive for me, I handle the reinvestment via my savings plans. To do this, I increase the existing savings plans by the amount distributed. In my opinion, this is the simplest and, above all, the cheapest way.


When does it make sense not to reinvest your dividends?

In my opinion, there are three main scenarios in which reinvestment does not make sense:


The first reason is probably the most obvious. When you reach retirement age and thus generally also lose your income from employment, you will need the additional income. This is particularly the case if the payments and income from other sources (e.g. statutory or company pension, insurance, rental income, etc.) are not sufficient to cover living expenses or are intended to increase this for a more comfortable standard of living through dividends.When reinvesting dividends, the effects on the portfolio weighting should also be taken into account. This can shift as a result of regular reinvestments. Positions with a higher dividend yield logically build up faster than those with a lower one, which can result in an overweighting. If the overweight positions perform well, this is an advantage. If they perform worse, the losses are all the greater and the overall performance can suffer significantly. In my opinion, this should be avoidable by regularly reviewing the individual investment cases, in line with the motto buy & hold + check.It is also advisable to refrain from reinvesting if the overall portfolio is to be diversified. For example, dividends can be used to build up a new position or even to invest in new asset classes that allow reinvestment at a better return.

Basically, the question raised at the beginning can be answered as follows: It depends. Both alternatives offer advantages and disadvantages, so the decision as to whether dividends should be reinvested or not is a personal one that depends on the respective financial and investment opportunities and objectives. With a long-term investment horizon, it makes absolute sense to reinvest your dividends in order to make maximum use of the compound interest effect. This is particularly the case if you are in the accumulation phase of your portfolio and at the same time have sufficient financial resources available that you do not need the dividend income. However, if regular income is required or other investment options appear more attractive, reinvesting the dividends received is not an option.


Thank you for reading :) If you liked this article, I would be delighted if you followed me and left a like for more content on the topic of dividends

110
31 Comments

profile image
@ccf ☺️👍 In 6 years on the stock market I have already reinvested €20k 😁👍
34
profile image
profile image
@Simpson mega stark!!!
Is not an answer to the question but only a profiling !
2
profile image
Hi, I have also long thought about whether I a distributing or reinvesting ETF as a core bespare. Since I already have no desire and probably in the next 30 years also not. e.g. quarterly to reinvest my dividends, I have finally decided for an accumulating ETF.
Especially since I would still need a relatively long time for the 2000€ allowance. Disturbing factor here for me is always the time between payout and reinvestment, via a free savings plan (which you then also have to adjust) or individual purchase including the transaction fees. (Certainly feels some as a trifle) But I must say that I want to fill the gap in retirement rather by rental income and thus not rely on regular dividends. The quarterly dividend would thus be "forced" on me. Since I would rather decide for myself when and how much I want to pay out at a time and also need. Ultimately, it makes no difference in old age whether I sell shares or dividends are paid out. Thanks for your perspective :-) LG
2
profile image
@VP can absolutely understand your point of view. Since everyone must find his own way and a right or wrong there is rather not. For me, however, it is clear that in the ideal case I want to live off the distributions and therefore do not want to sell shares so that the substance of the portfolio is maintained :)
1
profile image
@dividend_doctor yup i see exactly the same. hopefully you don't have to touch anything and can indulge the next generation 🥳
1
profile image
Good evening - in principle, concrete gold in the form of rental income is preferable to dividends - why? Therefore: From a rental agreement you have income secured by the debt relationship - recurring monthly. A dividend is paid voluntarily by the company and can also be cancelled permanently or in the long term. Accordingly, a "supplementary pension" based on dividends is always associated with increased risk. Good luck investing 👍🏻
@Leuchtturm can rents not fail?
profile image
@Moep Yes, you can. Ask landlords how often they have been affected by rent defaults 🤷🏻‍♂️ And once again: Rent debt relationship - dividend no claim is no debt relationship. Always look at it objectively 🤣.
@Leuchtturm I know a few landlords. Even those who exclusively rent social housing so that the defaults are as low as possible or rather practically zero... If the rent fails and not only once, you may never see the money again. Then you have to look for new tenants and whether you have them immediately... maybe the apartment or the house will remain vacant for a few more months? So how secure the rent is depends on the tenant. The same goes for the companies with their dividends, and the price usually looks accordingly.
profile image
Yes, I am a landlord of 10 residential units. In the last 5 years it has already happened 2 times that tenants have not paid more. This leads to stress and legal fees. Eviction action, payment action etc. From the 1st case I got back about 60% of the default. In the 2nd case, the court is still dealing with the payment claim. Whether I still get something from the good 2,500€ remains to be seen. And if I do, it will take at least a year. Dividends are much more relaxed and if they are cancelled completely, you sell the stock. That's definitely more passive than running after defaulting tenants. LG
1
Deleted User
2Yr
Comment was deleted
profile image
@Dividenden_Tom I am referring to individual shares. Nonsense worst-case scenario, the dividends there could also fail. Even if they don't, they could be reduced 🤷🏻‍♂️
profile image
@Leuchtturm I think this is comparing apples and oranges: As far as I know, there is no tax-free allowance and no partial exemption for rental income, but there is for dividends. As far as I know, I can deduct investments from my taxes for real estate, but not for dividends. Real estate more or less ties me geographically when it comes to management, while I can receive and manage dividends all over the world. I can sell a block of shares almost anywhere at any time, but I can't do that easily with real estate. etc....
1
View all 6 further answers
profile image
@dividend_doctor Nice summary, I use dividends and distributions for a large part of my ETF savings plans. I save in distributing ETFs which together with dividend shares should form an additional pension.
2
profile image
My dividends largely go towards annual vacation 🏝
2
profile image
Thanks for the contribution. What would be the personal dividend yield with Realty Income in your example? Would also be important interesting to also show the dividend growth and that it is super ☺️
1
profile image
@Joris Good idea! Measured on the BuyIn one comes to a personal dividend yield of about 10.4% in the 10th year
1
profile image
@ccf Thank you for your effort
1
profile image
1
profile image
Top contribution, thank you 👍@ccf
1
profile image
@ccf and again a post that you can link countless times 🤩!
1
profile image
I still have a whole 30 years until retirement, I invest 100% of the dividends so far. When the thought of retirement comes then I will probably take them out as compensation for the low pension. Until then, let's see what else comes^^
1
profile image
@DyeTech think you are doing everything right! Since you do not rely on the pension leads no way past the self-sufficient
Join the conversation