2Yr·

❌German corporate and business forms❌


Before I write the second part on foreclosures at the end of May, I would like to give you a brief overview of German company forms and their special features. I have noticed that the many abbreviations lead to confusion, which I hope will be a thing of the past after this article.


Some information first:


Under German law, there are a number of different legal forms that a company can choose. Some of these companies do not have to be entered in the commercial register. The majority, however, do. The German register system consists of the Commercial Register A, the Commercial Register B, the Register of Associations and the Register of Partnerships. These are kept at the local court by the department for register matters.

Commercial register A mainly contains sole traders and partnerships (oHG + KG). In commercial register B, these are the corporations, i.e. mainly the GmbH and the AG. The register of associations logically contains the registered associations and the partnership register contains the partnerships.


Now we come to the special features of selected companies. I will discuss the characteristics and possible advantages and disadvantages. I will also try to give an example in each case. However, I will not discuss associations and partnerships, as these do not quite fit in with the topic of this article.


Outline:

1. registered merchant (e.K)

2. civil law partnership (GbR)

3. general partnership (oHG)

4. limited partnership (KG)

5. GmbH & Co. KG

6th KGaA

7. limited liability company

8TH AG

9TH SE


1. the registered merchant §§ 1 ff. HGB

This refers to an individual who operates a commercial business. From a certain size, it is mandatory to be entered in the commercial register. In contrast to corporations, there is less of an obligation to keep accounts here, but the merchant has unlimited liability with all his (including private) assets.


Example: Micro-enterprise with one owner (baker, butcher ...)


2. civil law partnership (GbR) § 705 ff. BGB


Also known as a BGB company, this is a simple form of company that does not even have to be founded in writing or by a notary. If the GbR wishes to engage in legal transactions, which is possible according to current case law of the Federal Court of Justice, it must also appear to the outside world as a GbR (so-called external GbR). As things stand at present, a GbR does not have to be entered in the register. This will change with the new law (MoPeG), valid from 2024. The advantage is that the GbR is easy to set up. The disadvantage, however, is that each partner has unlimited liability with their assets.

Example: Law firms with several lawyers as partners or craft businesses. Not very common, however.


3. general partnership §§ 105 ff. HGB


Similar to the GbR, but must be entered in the commercial register. This must be a commercial enterprise, which may initially be a GbR, but from a certain size is an oHG. The partners (owners) represent the company externally. There must always be at least 2 people involved (otherwise an e.K.). In contrast to corporations, bookkeeping is also simplified here, but the partners are liable with all their assets, which is why the oHG is not very common.

Example: book publisher, car dealer


4. limited partnership §§ 161 ff. HGB


Similar to the oHG, but here there must be at least one partner (general partner) and one limited partner. The general partner represents the company externally and is liable with all its assets. The limited partner makes a contribution (limited partner's share) and is liable for a maximum of this. He is not authorized to represent the company and receives a share of the profits (dividend). The advantage here is that the company can accumulate a large amount of capital through the limited partners.


Examples: Wind farm operator or as with the oHG


5. GmbH & Co. KG


Like the KG, but with the exception that the general partner here is not a natural person, but a limited liability company. Sub-companies are often founded by the parent company in order to spin off a division and thus generate capital through the limited partners. It does not necessarily have to be a GmbH (also possible as AG & Co. KG, SE & Co. KG or even with the participation of a foreign company as Ltd. & Co. KG).


Examples: Food manufacturers, wind farm operators, solar park operators, real estate groups


6. KGaA §§ 278 ff. AktG


This is a partnership limited by shares. A fully liable person (general partner) is also involved here, as well as the other partners as limited shareholders in the share capital divided into shares. As this is a corporation, the formation is somewhat more complex and expensive. However, it is rarely used in practice.


Example: Borussia Dortmund as a GmbH & Co. KGaA, Merck KGaA


7. GmbH, §§ 1 ff. GmbHG

The limited liability company is the most popular form of company in Germany. It can be established by one or more persons. The owners are the shareholders, the GmbH is represented by the managing director(s). A minimum share capital of EUR 25,000.00 is required for formation. The shareholders are not liable with their personal assets, but only with the share capital. The formation must be notarized and the GmbH must then be entered in the commercial register. This incurs formation costs of around EUR 2,000.00.


Examples: Medium-sized companies, QUIN Technologies GmbH 😉


8. public limited company AG §§ 1 ff. AktG


A distinction is made between unlisted stock corporations and listed companies. Require a large amount of capital (at least EUR 50,000.00 share capital). Are represented by the Management Board and have a Supervisory Board. The partners (shareholders) are the owners. This means that anyone who acquires shares also becomes a small part owner. Only suitable for large companies.


Examples: Mercedes-Benz Group AG, Siemens AG


9 European Company (SE)


The abbreviation SE comes from the French Societas Europaea and stands for European public limited company. It is based on EU Regulation No. 2157/2001 from 2001. Comparable to a German AG, but with a minimum share capital of EUR 120,000.00 divided into shares. Representation is by the Board of Directors and the Managing Directors.

Recently, German stock corporations have frequently converted into an SE.


Examples: Allianz SE, SAP SE, Airbus SE


If you have any questions, please ask them in the comments. I will then try to answer them as best I can. If necessary, my girlfriend (a specialist lawyer for commercial and corporate law) will certainly help me.

I apologize for any minor spelling mistakes (despite corrections). It's been a hard day at work.

Hopefully it could help some of you. I look forward to your feedback 🚀

49
50 Comments

profile image
7
profile image
@ccf You've already been nominated, but maybe that'll help.
6
profile image
@Divmann thank you 😊
Not yet in May, actually. But it's not about the money for me. I like the topics and everyone should have some knowledge of company law.
1
profile image
@tim1 Oh, I meant nominated with the @ccf, here in the comments 😅

You can also add the Silent Society, exotic
profile image
@Divmann oh well then you're right 😂

EEIG... nobody knows for sure 😅
2
profile image
@tim1 It's your job to change that!
profile image
@Divmann Airbus was an EEIG for a long time, but I don't actively know of any other. I once asked a registrar at the registry court. He has never registered anything like that in 30 years. So it only exists on paper 😅
profile image
I would also throw in the UG. Quasi a mimi GmbH and often attractive for a start with less capital 👍🏼
2
profile image
@SharkAce Good idea, I'll add to it later. It's basically like a GmbH. Unfortunately, UGs are often set up for criminal activities. I would never enter into a contract with a UG where I have to make advance payments 😅
1
profile image
@tim1 good point :D

But it's actually very good if you don't have any criminal intentions hahah you basically have a GmbH only without the 25K. You just have to save a certain percentage of your profit/turnover every year.
profile image
@SharkAce actually a good consideration for start-ups because of the limitation of liability. Previously, everyone who didn't have 25k founded an English Ltd.
1
profile image
"Hey I have a GmbH, you're a gay in a bra." - Kollegah, 2010
2
profile image
@Howsy89 Kollegah always pumped back in college. JBG 1 best album 😂
1
profile image
Merck KGaA 🚀 Dortmund... would have been the last thing that came to mind. 👀😅
1
profile image
@InvestmentPapa I hope you're not a blue and white 👀
profile image
@tim1 I'm a red and black Glubberer. FCN FOR A LIFETIME! ⚫️🔴 And that includes blue and white 🔵⚪️. Sorry... but in Malaga 2013 I was happy for and with Dortmund 🟡⚫️. 😬😅
1
profile image
@InvestmentPapa I have no problem with that, so you won't be unfollowed 😂
Unfortunately it wasn't enough in 2013 🥴
profile image
@ccf
Thank you for the informative Beitrag👍🏻
1
profile image
Very strong contribution 👍
1
profile image
Ahhh first semester corporate law 🌝 @ccf
1
profile image
@TheAccountant89 hope you've been paying attention? 🌚
1
profile image
@tim1 yes, but too long ago 👀
profile image
@TheAccountant89 Corporate law was never my strong point either. I don't understand how my girlfriend can do that every day 🥴
profile image
@tim1 ohh yes and then let the tax law flow in and good night 🤯
1
profile image
@TheAccountant89 It doesn't do that. But insolvency law. Including as an insolvency administrator. It's a goldmine, but you need a thick skin.
profile image
@tim1 I had also considered it at the beginning of my studies. But somehow nothing came of it. I didn't focus enough on business law to go down that path
1
profile image
@TheAccountant89 I don't think your job was a bad choice either 😅
profile image
Are there any other topic suggestions in this area? I'm slowly running out of topics 😂
profile image
@tim1 Perhaps advantages and disadvantages of different forms?

For the purpose of liability, disclosure obligations, bookkeeping or revenue surplus account etc.? :)

You could introduce a company/company form with each post.

(Not to forget the BGB company or civil law partnership, such as car pools 😂)
1
profile image
@Staatsmann Unfortunately, I don't have the expertise. So with the balance sheets etc. 😅 But thanks for the suggestion. I'll have a think about what is feasible.
1
profile image
Isn't the asset-managing GmbH missing? (I was not sure if the first word was correct)

In any case, as a GmbH managing director you can keep yourself in the statutory health insurance fund because you see yourself as an employee (so my memory can be that there is something mixed up😅)
profile image
@Andreas1991 Do you mean the asset-managing GmbH?

Interesting for real estate, as no trade tax is payable under certain conditions.
1
profile image
@TimB2493 Yes, that's exactly what I mean there was also a class addition for derivatives trading, but a strong taxation of dividends
profile image
@Andreas1991 25% stop. Capital gains on shares are tax-free. Also interesting in the Russian debate, as corporate write-downs cannot be recognized as a tax deduction in return.
profile image
@TimB2493 Yes, that's true, but as it doesn't affect me, I haven't looked into the subject of Russia and its significance for the stock market. I just like to travel in the USA because the volume of options is simply better there.

So far, I've only dealt with the vGmbH in passing as I'm still in the process of raising capital before I start my own business.
profile image
@Andreas1991 is more about the stock corporations with business in Russia.

I can only recommend a tax consultant for business start-ups.
profile image
@TimB2493 Yes, I wouldn't do it alone either - it would just be too risky to keep an eye on everything.


Oh, you mean the mcd, dbk etc. To be honest, I haven't even looked into companies.
profile image
@Andreas1991 VV GmbH is a completely normal GmbH. By law, there is only the normal GmbH and the UG as a sub-form.
1
profile image
@tim1 Now confusion arises😅
profile image
@Andreas1991 in what way? Please explain.
profile image
Legal: GmbH Special tax law feature: asset-managing GmbH
1
View all 2 further answers
profile image
Thank you for the informative and detailed article. One question: are any of these forms also suitable for asset protection in the case of real estate? The subject of equalization of encumbrances and compulsory mortgages. Such measures cannot be completely ruled out in the future. Privately owned real estate is known to be "low-hanging fruit" for the state.
profile image
@chrismontero I think it's unlikely. But it wouldn't make any difference whether the property is privately owned or owned by your company. I still think it's very unlikely.
1
profile image
Small note: e.K. actually means "registered merchant" (registered in the HR). Before that, you are effectively just a sole proprietorship
profile image
@Kevin good addition, it wasn't immediately clear. I changed it once 👍🏼
profile image
Chef!
Deleted User
2Yr
Comment was deleted
profile image
@Asthos On the one hand, it would be easier to relocate the registered office within Europe. In addition, the dualistic system (Management Board + Supervisory Board) could be bundled into one body in the SE, which would give the body more control. At the moment, it is simply "cooler" with regard to internationally active companies.
Join the conversation