6D·

You're all fucking gamblers!!!11elf

It's your own fault if 30% tax is now due and the transaction tax comes along on the side: You are simply gambling too much and doing too little.

Experts have calculated this in an expert report. Hah! You victims! 🫠

Because the SPD already knew in January 2020 that it was the stock market gamblers who were at stake.

attachment

Now that everyone has calmed down again, you can get back to the meatballs, dive into the falling knife and diligently $NOVO B (-1.31%) buy. Vamos!

Ciaovapcici and see you soonrian, see you when $NVDA (-0.25%) at 85$ 👋🏽

78

72 Comments

Enrique@Dividenden_Monteur

6D

I've heard that every time the SPD says/writes something stupid and populist, you can hear Helmut Schmidt spinning in his grave in Hamburg-Ohlsdorf.

•

80

•

Alpalaka@Alpalaka

6D

@Dividenden_Monteur Helmut must be dizzy :(

•

2

•

Gomerdoc@Gomerdoc

6D

@Dividenden_Monteur That has to be the case. This nonsense of the SPD for 80 years is the main reason for the earth's rotation: in the world's tombs, everyone is constantly turning around, which is probably the main reason for the earth's torque.
If the SPD were to do something sensible, it would probably be very detrimental to the day/night rhythm of the planet.

Prove me wrong🤣

But what is definitely true:
Cheap SPD polemics, and politics always only for the unemployed and welfare recipients: never for the little people who still have a job, not for the big ones anyway. And they wonder why nobody wants to vote for them anymore: 16% is still far too much.

•

9

•

Enrique@Dividenden_Monteur

6D

@Alpalaka Imagine if he had lived to see the ban on menthol cigarettes.
A round of respect in the SPD headquarters from a 90-year-old

•

1

•

Name@user24790529394

6D

@Dividenden_Monteur He'd be the first to be ousted and canceled.

••

NuklearDackel@NuklearDackel

6D

@Dividenden_MonteurIt rotated so much that an earthquake occurred in Southeast Asia. 😔

••

Charmin@Charmin

6D

@Dividenden_Monteur That's why it's always so stormy ...

••

6D

SPDUMM

•

31

•

Dividendenopi👴@Dividendenopi

6D

A wise woman from the UK once said that the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

•

31

•

NEWT@SteelAnacott

6D

@Dividendenopi However, this clever woman also managed to divide British society into rich and poor with her policies. A legacy that Britain is still grappling with today.

•

4

•

Dividendenopi👴@Dividendenopi

6D

@SteelAnacott that is also correct, but in my view it does not change the accuracy of your statement. And the division in our country is also in full swing, with unwilling recipients of redistribution against responsible providers.

•

2

•

NEWT@SteelAnacott

6D

@Dividendenopi Perhaps we should simply draw our conclusions from Thatcher's and Reagan's trickle-down economics and recognize that this approach does not work economically on the one hand and on the other hand drives the division of society. I am not saying that we are pursuing trickle-down per se, but we too see as a result of the policies of the last twenty years a society that is increasingly divided into rich and poor.

•

2

•

Soprano@Soprano

6D

@SteelAnacott Well, these are the consequences of 100 years of Keynesianism. We COULD follow Hayek's economic policy, but unfortunately it involves free markets and that clashes with the will of politicians to exercise control and restrict freedom.

That said, I'm not convinced per se why the rich & poor divide isn't right and important to some extent. In any case, insisting on equality is simply inhumane in most cases. Meritocracy is good, it just shouldn't degenerate into plutocracy.

•

2

•

6D

I've never read such stupid shit before

•

27

•

Name@user24790529394

6D

@user03 Imagine people voted for something like that. A whole 7 million.

•

5

•

6D

@user03 I have read much more absurd stuff from these socialist comrades of the bosses' party in recent years.

•

1

•

6D

@user24790529394 yes, those who never read the election programs but vote according to the motto "I've always voted anyway, so let's go"

•

1

•

Daniel@Daniel1212

6D

"Unlike everyone else, however, trading in shares has so far contributed nothing."
I think that's one of the stupidest sentences I've ever read...

•

22

•

Alpalaka@Alpalaka

6D

@Daniel1212 The kindergarten next door won't be finished any faster if you trade a bit of shares.

•

1

•

Daniel@Daniel1212

6D

@Alpalaka Sure. Above all, it is also suggested that people who trade in shares would otherwise contribute nothing. In contrast to EVERYONE else!!! Also bum-sympathetic...

•

4

•

6D

I always wonder what contribution all the social parasites actually make. 🤔

•

1

•

Artiskon@Artiskon

6D

@Pe_eT they buy cigarettes and beer and leave 19% at the bar ;)

•

1

•

NichtRelevant@NichtRelevant

6D

Why? Why should we pay? So that even more money can trickle away into an inefficient and wasteful state apparatus?

The money with which people buy shares was already taxed when it was earned. The companies that are bought generate profits that are taxed. The dividends that these companies pay out are also taxed.

Not enough for the SPD. Another tax can be added to penalize private provision. Why not a tax on breathing government air? Or you could reintroduce the window tax from the Middle Ages.

•

21

•

❤️DIST-LOVE@DISTLOVE

6D

@NichtRelevant "Why not a tax on breathing government air?" is called a CO2 tax.

•

2

•

CrashBurner@Psychedelic_Sunflower

6D

Linkspopulisten

•

20

•

Sebastian B.@Baisse-Jumper

6D

It's so cute how people always talk about "small investors", but nobody wants to put this into concrete figures. Instead of those who are driving the cart against the wall contributing something, it's always the "stupid" average Joe who has to pay the price. Politics is increasingly doing away with itself...

•

13

•

6D

And all this on money that has already been taxed. The investor bears the risk and losses too. The main thing is that the state gets risk-free money from the investor. They're all drinking Lack❗️

•

11

•

Jürgen S@Snoopyjs

6D

Oh man...yes of course, those who work 40 hours a week and then put €200 into their old-age pension don't contribute anything to the system....I know sooooo many stock gamblers who gamble on the stock market with several thousand euros from the citizen's income.....there's nothing more to think of

•

10

•

Investorenfrosch 🐸.@Investorenfrosch

6D

Cynical when you think about the fact that even the annual pension information recommends making private provisions to avoid poverty in old age🙏In the end, Germany experienced a greater share culture again, which of course doesn't please the tax crows👀

•

8

•

Daniel@Daniel1212

6D

"Experts have calculated this in an expert report..."

800€... Can you hire these experts as tax consultants?

•

6

•

Alpalaka@Alpalaka

6D

@Daniel1212 already a wild bill

•

1

•

6D

It seems to me that all investors here are labeled as gamblers. Those who "gamble" wildly without any expertise or analysis are surely only a fraction. All the fine-talk from the SPD is useless, investors who make private provisions for their pensions are still disadvantaged and ripped off - what does the SPD have to do with social issues! Criminals!

•

5

•

Alpalaka@Alpalaka

6D

@SL833 I find it worrying that the poster is from January 2020. Nothing has changed at all since then. Investors = gamblers

••

6D

@SL833 well, social is included in asocial 😉 they should rename themselves aSPD. That would provide clarity.

••

6D

Tax hike party! They can only reach into people's pockets because they think the money already belongs to them and not to the people.

•

4

•

Charmin@Charmin

6D

Tar, feather and drive through the streets. That's what you should do with them.

With the SPD, of course. Not with the investors.

•

4

•

Jupp D.@JuppDupp

6D

@Charmin I would go one step further

••

6D

The best thing I read today ❤️ the part with Novo was phenomenal. I couldn't have said it better 😁

•

3

•

Pascal@TheAmazingInc

6D

Under the guise that the citizens are supposed to be social, we are all being dispossessed and the politicians are still filling their pockets, investing in war, subsidizing terrorist organizations and their NGOs, and again, nothing gets to the actual things we pay taxes for (infrastructure and social system)...

•

3

•

Soprano@Soprano

6D

Boy how anti-social can a party be? Even in their own propaganda they write that they just want to steal €800 from pensioners and that's their BEST argument to trivialize their policies?!

You really have to read that several times to understand it. They write again in point 2 that they don't want to attack people who are only saving for old age and then prove it by saying that even with such a tiny sum as €10,000, with which you don't achieve anything in old-age provision, you are already stealing €800.

•

3

•

Name@user24790529394

6D

People who own shares are gamblers! They should pay!!! 😂

•

2

•

Alpalaka@Alpalaka

6D

@user24790529394 all losers and freeloaders :D

••

Charmin@Charmin

5D

Yes, you only want to get at the big ones, of course. Then you could have simply linked the whole thing to an exemption amount up to which there is no transaction tax.

The state wants more and more money for an excessive control and regulation apparatus.

If the Union parties go along with this, they will be history for me once and for all.

•

2

•

𝒻𝓇𝓊𝑔𝒶𝓁 𝒻𝓇𝑒𝒾 𝓈𝑒𝒾𝓃 🗽@frugalfreisein

4D

This party is so crazy... they apply taxation on purchases but not on sales???? And then say those who trade a lot should pay and not those who save for old age? Then they should tax the sale and not the purchase. What they're doing is simply rubbish!!!

•

2

•

❤️DIST-LOVE@DISTLOVE

6D

So what kind of morons vote for this anti-citizen party? Simply frightening.

•

1

•

6D

@DISTLOVE Back when the GDR collapsed, more than 10% in the East still voted for the Mauerschützen-Einsperr successor party to the SED [here PDS]. There are simply too many profiteers of this socialist amigo party of many minions. And yes, there are also muddleheads, so that they still get 16% today.

•

1

•

Jason M.@JasonMcMillen

6D

It must be unconstitutional to keep inventing new taxes. Especially as the tax burden is already very high in Germany.
Who doesn't say that in 2 years the % will rise to 0.5% or 1%. It's only one percent. But every percent you lose, especially if you save for 30-40 years for your pension, will amount to €10,000 later on. Just so that the state gets another % here and there.

•

1

•

Ivan I.@IvanIvanov

6D

Exactly my humor, printing billions to finance war, but continuing to rip off citizens everywhere to drive up taxes.

•

1

•

6D

Because the "stock market gamblers" have so far had their profits completely tax-free or what? So crazy.

•

1

•

Chandra@Chandra

6D

"shall only be due when shares are purchased."

Then I'll just buy derivatives. Don't want to be a 'gambler'. 😎

•

1

•

Mister_ultra@Mister_ultra

6D

Red and Green are driving the CDU forward.

Always forwards, never backwards. Off to socialism 2.0....

•

1

•

Konstantin@Konstantin85

6D

Absolutely insane. Absolutely insane party cartel.

•

1

•

6D

Who votes for that 😂☠️

•

1

•

Nicolas@RavenWealth

4D

hahaha, sooner or later this will be totally trending = 1488
who wants to bet ? it`s inevitable , has happened before will happen again
dont be too attached to our current financial system buddies
politics is just a distraction , you shall not mention the real problem
they`ll give you circus and bread but stay home, own nothing and smile
ur tax will go to bombard kids and ladies somewhere while u watch Tell a Vision ;)

•

1

•

Join the conversation