It is often proclaimed here that less is more and financial market theory from academia clearly states that a single cost-effective global ETF is sufficient.
Why is that not enough for me? An often underestimated factor in investing is the feel-good factor with your investments, which can vary greatly depending on your situation and needs. With my investment strategy, I already manage to participate in my investments via dividends and still generate growth.
The allocation provides for 60% in the $VWRL (-0.36%) growth is also covered by the high tech exposure.
The other ETFs are intended to expand the quality theme by approx. 20% $FGEQ (+0.47%) and dividend growth.
The $TDIV (+0.2%) should contribute approx. 20% to country/industry balancing (USA lower), whereby the product with a 4.5% dividend yield has a sufficiently high, but not too high, share in the portfolio and pushes the dividends in the here and now. In addition, it acts as a hedge due to the different industry allocation; if tech stagnates, this ETF rises countercyclically, as the current week including sector rotation illustrates.
With this allocation, we are moving forward.
The 100k will follow, at the latest in December.
