It is often proclaimed here that less is more and financial market theory from academia clearly states that a single cost-effective global ETF is sufficient.
Why is that not enough for me? An often underestimated factor in investing is the feel-good factor with your investments, which can vary greatly depending on your situation and needs. With my investment strategy, I already manage to participate in my investments via dividends and still generate growth.
The allocation provides for 60% in the $VWRL (-0.91%) growth is also covered by the high tech exposure.
The other ETFs are intended to expand the quality theme by approx. 20% $FGEQ (-1.25%) and dividend growth.
The $TDIV (-0.63%) should contribute approx. 20% to country/industry balancing (USA lower), whereby the product with a 4.5% dividend yield has a sufficiently high, but not too high, share in the portfolio and pushes the dividends in the here and now. In addition, it acts as a hedge due to the different industry allocation; if tech stagnates, this ETF rises countercyclically, as the current week including sector rotation illustrates.
With this allocation, we are moving forward.
The 100k will follow, at the latest in December.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/116e3/116e378f8f21dc777be5a7e86d777d0ab3782fa0" alt="attachment"