1Wk·

Ethics and Rheinmetall: A Historical Reflection for Investors

For investors in Rheinmetall, it is essential to understand the historical context of the company. During World War II, Rheinmetall-Borsig AG was a major arms supplier to Nazi Germany, producing anti-aircraft guns (such as the 8.8 cm Flak), tanks and artillery. In 1941, the company was nationalized under the Reichswerke Hermann Göring. Shocking is the use of forced laborers, including prisoners from concentration camps such as Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen, in their factories, such as in Unterlüß. Although Rheinmetall covers this history briefly on their website, this information is crucial for investors who value ethical considerations and transparency. Today, Rheinmetall is a leading player in defense and technology, but these historical facts require careful consideration in investment decisions. Due diligence remains essential to assess both financial and moral risks in an industry where ethics and profits are closely intertwined.

Link : https://youtu.be/vxnwWBOauYM?si=ygVQqnb17Gch0BI2


$RHM (-2.24%)

2
8 Comments

profile image
I generally don't invest in weapons. But the American, British, French .... companies are just as bad. All have caused destruction and suffering around the world. Rhm is NOT worse than similar stocks.
3
profile image
Historical reckoning and understanding its place in today’s security framework don’t clash for me. If you’ve learned from the past, you know why we need solid defenses today. Owning the past isn’t the same as disarming. Democracy doesn’t defend itself.
1
profile image
@Savvy_investor_2000 100% agree. Realism goes a long way.
1
profile image
@Quasar very interesting when a German responds to my topic
profile image
@pwasbeer
Awareness of history doesn’t require blindness to reality.
1
profile image
Based as fuck
Morality does not exist on the stock market!!! 😉
Sold rhm for the first time 2 years ago today, at around €270!!! I could kick myself in the ass... kick my ass...🫣
profile image
There is not just one armaments company, but also a system of suppliers and preliminary products. What about the steelworks, the tire manufacturers or the chemical companies that, in addition to civilian use, can also use their products for armaments. See DJI and their drones. Do you think four years ago everything was 95% for civilian use, today 50/50? Today, everyone invests a little in armaments, even if it is not $RHM directly. The military also needs brakes, cans of food and fuel - My2cents
Join the conversation