6D·

Why we should focus on Trump instead of hate speech

attachment

In Germany, many people rely on news sources such as ARD, which often only present a fragment of the global economic reality. In the USA in particular, where the national debt burden is around 36.2 trillion dollars and continues to rise every year, the financial challenges are gigantic. This corresponds to a per capita debt of over 106,000 dollars, a clear sign that there are profound economic problems.


Stock markets in the US have experienced a rollercoaster ride in 2024, with a big explosion followed by a sharp fall. This reflects the volatility of market values, which have been overvalued in recent years despite the highest inflation in four decades. The debt to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio is an impressive 121%, highlighting that the US is spending more than the economy can afford each year.


Against this backdrop, the economic approaches and austerity measures proposed by Trump are crucial. Elon Musk $TSLA (-0.68%) has already saved 240 billion dollars through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and plans to save billions more each year. In addition, an increase in customs revenue from 50 billion to 500 billion dollars is expected to drastically reduce the annual deficit from 2 trillion to 500 billion dollars.

attachment

To dispel common misconceptions about the impact of tariffs, here are some clarifying points based on 2016 data: Despite the imposition of tariffs on solar panels, washing machines, steel and aluminum, prices for solar panels and washing machines have remained largely stable, while prices for metals have actually declined. These observations refute the assumption that tariffs generally lead to higher prices. There is also a significant difference in customs policy between the EU and the USA. While the EU only imposes a 2.5% tariff on imported cars, the figure in the USA is 10%. These facts should be taken into account when discussing economic policy in order to enable a well-founded and objective assessment of tariff measures.


Another exemplary project is the GOLD Cards, a residence permit by investment, which cost 5 million euros each. Over 1000 of these have already been sold, generating significant additional revenue and are expected to help further reduce the budget deficit.


In Germany, the debt brake may protect us from such extreme financial problems, but that does not mean we should ignore the problems of other countries. Criticizing Trump's economic policies may be simplistic, but it ignores the complexity and urgency of the situation facing the US. It is important to look beyond our own backyard and take a more objective perspective on other countries' efforts to stabilize their economies. This requires a serious examination of the measures and not mere agitation.

13
13 Comments

profile image
Your observation ignores the fact that the introduction of tariffs will slow down the US economy. Exports of goods produced in the USA will fall. Less economic growth leads to less tax revenue.
At the same time, domestic prices will rise and this will curb consumption.
The damage caused by tariffs is greater than the potential revenue. That is why we have been trying for decades to establish free trade agreements with other countries.
You can't dismiss all criticism as agitation, that also contradicts your own statement that you have to look beyond your own nose.
30
profile image
@ModernMoney it seems you are repeating the usual arguments against tariffs, but let's look at the actual data from 2016. That year, Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels, washing machines, steel and aluminum. Contrary to frequent criticism, the data showed that prices for solar panels and washing machines remained largely stable and metal prices actually fell. In addition, the difference in customs policy between the EU and the USA is remarkable: while the EU only imposes a 2.5% tariff on cars, the USA pays 10% on imports. These figures suggest that the effects of tariffs cannot be assessed as negative across the board and that a differentiated view is necessary.
2
profile image
@ModernMoney hottest comment regarding Trump I've read in a long time
1
profile image
@Luis-

It may be the case that individual goods were not affected by inflation to the same extent or will not be affected by the upcoming tariffs. This may be due to countermeasures taken by the US government, such as a reduction in corporate taxes. However, this would be another argument in favor of the tariffs not generating any additional revenue, as a reduction in corporate taxes also costs money.

With regard to the tariffs from 2016, it can be said that the loss of prosperity for US consumers amounted to around USD 50 billion per year.
There are various studies on this by economists, e.g. "The impact of the 2018 tariffs on prices and welfare" in the Journal of Economic Perspectives from 2019 or "The return to protectionism" in "The Quarterly Journal of Economics" from 2020
5
profile image
divide the amount you mentioned as being saved by doge by a factor of 100 then it is roughly correct, i.e. a ridiculous sum... reducing bureaucracy and being more economical is certainly right, but the doge action is nonsense and counterproductive and obviously useless except for undermining the state and the checks and balances
12
profile image
Slimming down the state CAN be a sensible thing to do.
But I somehow doubt that DOGE is saving at the right end.

The IRS could collect $500 billion less in tax revenue, report says, and the U.S. may run out of cash in a few months without a debt-ceiling hike
(...)
"Aggressive reductions to budget and personnel capacity risk backlogs, delays, reduced receipts, and diminished capacity to build next generation digital capabilities,"

https://www.yahoo.com/news/irs-could-collect-500-billion-164844252.html
11
profile image
Do you have a reputable source for "has already saved 240 billion dollars through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)"?
3
In any case, it's not a good idea to generate your information from the German mainstream media, which is dominated by left-wing wishful thinking; just look at the reporting on Tesla and the share price performance of the last few days. Otherwise, I largely agree with OP, but would go even further: above all, the reversal of the leftist - and growth-inhibiting - ideological projects of recent decades (DEI, climate, migration) will give the US a strong competitive advantage - I remain heavily invested in the US.
3
profile image
The 1000 Gold Cards sold (if this is really true) have thus raised 5 billion. With the sums you mention (DOGE has allegedly already saved 240 billion, which I think is a huge exaggeration), these 5 billion are not a huge contribution to relieving the burden on the state budget. That's what Elon Musk supposedly saves every other day with his DOGE successes. ^^
In contrast to you, I think that the tariffs will contribute to an improvement in finances in the long term is greatly exaggerated. First of all, inflation will increase, which is guaranteed to annoy citizens. If the Chinese offer something for USD 20 and the product now costs USD 25 due to tariffs, the domestic companies will certainly not offer the same product for USD 19, they would be stupid. So they make USD 24. Then Trump can argue that the US product is USD 1 cheaper, but it still doesn't matter if the citizen still pays USD 4 more. Especially as I can also strongly imagine that sales of American goods to the world will decrease significantly. Certainly not for software and chips, but certainly for other products. I'm thinking of the defense industry, every other country will hopefully think twice before buying from the Americans. You read more and more that Tesla's figures are collapsing.
Tourism is certainly not to be neglected either. On the one hand, the entry barriers for tourists are becoming more and more restrictive (=absurd), and the cost of vacations is also increasing. Anyone who has never been to the USA will certainly not want to go there at the moment. And people who might want to travel there will also look for alternatives.
All the MAGA disciples are always saying that the USA doesn't need anyone. But most of them only think from the wall to the wallpaper.
3
profile image
High Quality Engagement Bait or I feel sorry for you.
2
profile image
@Europoor definitely the latter.
1
You mention a few commodities for which prices have remained stable. But isn't it the case that GDP fell by 1% in 2016, the real loss of income was just over $7 billion and the retaliatory tariffs cut exports by almost 10%? Free trade is and remains the better option.
The D.O.G.E. Clock is a toy and the data is demonstrably incorrect, at least so far. I've just looked it up and it showed 121 billion in February and DOGE itself only reported 55 billion, which is already a lot.
I can't judge how trustworthy this site is, but it sounds conclusive:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/feb/21/social-media/does-a-us-debt-clock-prove-doge-has-saved-64-billi/
1
I like a lot that you post an opposing view here at GQ, in contrast to most opinions. The hate is strong, so it needs thick skin to do this.

I also agree with your moderate approach to all the news and bias on this subject. All things should be digested with a spoon of salt.

Thank you for your contribution
Join the conversation