profile image
Hello :) So for me this is out of the question at this point, in my opinion it is already too late to play this theme with a larger weighting as an ETF - so it could still boost performance pro-cyclically for a while, but then I would miss the right exit time for this tactical play. But a lot has already been priced into this sector and I wouldn't feel comfortable with it. In my opinion, you should always be positioned BEFOREhand on such topics and be able to justify this thesis well. Otherwise you end up with the Global Clean Energy hydrogen debacle in your portfolio, where the ETF went hand in hand with the overvaluation of the hydrogen stalls.

Just my assessment - and maybe you are doing everything right and there is some kind of armor super cycle. :)
8
profile image
@Roccola601 Thank you for your detailed answer :)
A lot is certainly already priced in, I agree.
I would rather see the ETF as a satellite in my portfolio (with FSTE All world as a stable core) to ideally get a few extra percent out of it. Especially because I think that in the next 4-5 years the political tensions will not ease but worsen (keywords: Russia, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Gaza,...) - I hope I am wrong!

I know it's pure speculation, as with any sector ETF. But at the moment this is the sector that A) is underrepresented in my portfolio and B) will get a lot of attention.

Edit: thanks for the comparison with the clean energy sector - I'll read up on that now :)
1