I'm not with Flatex, but I can at least tell you something about the $VNA dividends.
The dividend is not a classic dividend but a repayment of the contribution, therefore the dividend is tax-free, at the same time the "tax-relevant" acquisition value is reduced, so you pay the KEST of this repayment in the course of a future sale. Please note that you will see this taxable acquisition value in the KEST report, but not in your deposit acquisition price, which remains unchanged. These 2 acquisition prices are 2 pairs of shoes, similar to accumulating ETFs. There, for example, the tax acquisition price is also adjusted, but not the acquisition price that you see in the custody account.
The spin-off also seems correct to me, but I can't quite make sense of your description, especially what you mean by the fact that not all shares should be reduced by the spin-off portion? There won't be 2 DHR shares (with and without) in the future?
The dividend is not a classic dividend but a repayment of the contribution, therefore the dividend is tax-free, at the same time the "tax-relevant" acquisition value is reduced, so you pay the KEST of this repayment in the course of a future sale. Please note that you will see this taxable acquisition value in the KEST report, but not in your deposit acquisition price, which remains unchanged. These 2 acquisition prices are 2 pairs of shoes, similar to accumulating ETFs. There, for example, the tax acquisition price is also adjusted, but not the acquisition price that you see in the custody account.
The spin-off also seems correct to me, but I can't quite make sense of your description, especially what you mean by the fact that not all shares should be reduced by the spin-off portion? There won't be 2 DHR shares (with and without) in the future?
••
@TomTurboInvest 1) I am not sure about this. As described above, the acquisition price was reduced for Danaher and the new (reduced) acquisition prices are also displayed for accumulating ETFs. You can always see in the securities account transactions that the shares are booked out with the old prices and booked in with the new ones. This did not happen with Vonovia. It was even stated on the statement that it was a tax-free distribution, which was then deducted. As I said, nothing has happened.
Regarding 2) I mean the following: if I only had 1 Danaher share then I would not receive any Veralto because 3 are required for this. Now it was the case that I got approx. 22€ for this cash (peak regulation). (i.e. 1/3 of Veralto) - But a whole Veralto share was deducted from the purchase price (i.e. approx. 65€). That makes no sense
Where are you? I think you're from Austria too, aren't you? 😊
Regarding 2) I mean the following: if I only had 1 Danaher share then I would not receive any Veralto because 3 are required for this. Now it was the case that I got approx. 22€ for this cash (peak regulation). (i.e. 1/3 of Veralto) - But a whole Veralto share was deducted from the purchase price (i.e. approx. 65€). That makes no sense
Where are you? I think you're from Austria too, aren't you? 😊
••
@BregisMoon I am also Austrian but not with Flatex, I am with Easybank and nothing is booked in and out for such dividends. The cost price does not change, only the tax-relevant cost price. Apparently Flatex does it differently.
What does that look like in terms of performance? If you receive the dividend and the acquisition price changes at the same time? Or is this not even considered a dividend at Flatex?
What does that look like in terms of performance? If you receive the dividend and the acquisition price changes at the same time? Or is this not even considered a dividend at Flatex?
••