1Mon·

Why "domestic" ETF providers are worth considering
are


In the increasingly globalized financial world, choosing the right ETF provider can be a difficult decision. While international ETF providers often boast big names and an impressive range of products, there are compelling reasons why investors should also consider domestic ETF providers. These considerations range from support for the domestic economy to alignment with home values and potential cost benefits.


A comment from me on why $AMUN (+2.38%) , $HSBA (+1.51%) or $DWS (+1.83%) should sometimes be the first choice after all.

Reading time 3-5 minutes.


1. Supporting the local economy


The first and perhaps most obvious reason to choose a domestic ETF provider is to support your local economy. By investing in ETFs managed by local providers, investors are not only supporting the growth and stability of domestic financial markets, but also local employment and innovation. Any domestic provider that can compete with international giants helps to strengthen the financial center and secure jobs. In addition, the administrative costs that investors pay flow directly back into the domestic economy instead of flowing abroad.


2 Value-oriented investment decisions


Another point that is often overlooked is the value orientation of the investment strategy. Domestic ETF providers generally have a better understanding of the cultural and economic characteristics of their country. They are often more closely networked with local markets and companies and can therefore offer products that are better tailored to the needs and values of local investors. This can also be reflected in a better consideration of sustainability criteria, social responsibility and governance principles, which are often important to local investors.


3. cost savings with comparable quality


Another convincing reason to choose domestic ETF providers lies in the potential cost advantages. As international providers often have high marketing and distribution budgets, domestic providers often have to offer their products at a lower cost. Management fees and other costs are also often lower, as they do not have the same high overhead costs as international providers. In addition, for products that are similar in structure and investment objective, the differences in quality are often minimal. Domestic ETFs therefore often offer excellent value for money.


Potential disadvantages and trade-offs

Of course, there are also reasons that could speak against a domestic ETF provider. One example is a higher tracking error or some investors also prefer ETFs domiciled in Ireland (alluding to Amundi and Luxembourg) due to tax advantages. However, large brand names such as BlackRock or Vanguard attract many investors because they offer brands, high fund volumes and broad product ranges.

The fact remains that the differences in quality between domestic and international providers are small, especially for financial products such as ETFs, which are often standardized and transparent.


Addendum: Of course, you shouldn't put yourself in a worse position just to choose a domestic product.


Addendum 2: Domestic means Europe and it is not about ETF domicile in Germany but about the conflict between Ireland and Luxembourg regarding ETF domicile, which can certainly have an impact.


Cheers

21
24 Comments

profile image
I prefer $VWRL and $VWCE because it is more fun to have the ETF in Ireland than in Germany. What do I care about German ETF providers? Where does value creation take place here? Then I'd rather buy German products, that benefits the German economy more.
12
View all 11 further answers
profile image
Where are the Vanguard people who are about to explain to me why cooperatives are cool, which, by the way, only apply in the USA?
Show answer
profile image
I also tried it once when I was starting out here, in the meantime I was a Nazi. But I admit, I didn't write it as objectively as you did, but rather provocatively. I am pro domestic economy! I have now switched from FTSE All-World to Amundi ACWI Dist ;-).
View all 5 further answers
profile image
Actually every point you mentioned is bad for investor in Germany. And everything comes down to cost.
What you consider "supporting local economy " I see it as high TER just because you spent a lot to get a licence in Germany and now you need to recoup that somehow.

What you save in marketing ( according to your pt 3) you spend that or more in regulation and paperwork for Germany.
Show answer
I would choose amundi as an etf provider if they had a quarterly distributing world etf xD
profile image
I would generally prefer NL domicile due to the pro rata solidarity surcharge tax savings. However, there are hardly any interesting ETFs with NL domicile. In my opinion, a top ETF is $TDIV.

Join the conversation