1Yr
you have just conditioned yourself to a very moronic strategy. you buy "crises" to sell them for profit a short time later. highly risky. it would be better to buy companies in crises that have a very good business model and hold them for the long term out of the crisis. so that the company gives you a share of the cash flow. "if you are not interested in holding on to a share for 15 years, don't buy it in the first place." one of my favorite sayings by Warren Buffett. you can also use the capital market as a casino, but in the casino the bank always wins.
••
1Yr
I think everyone can choose their own strategy. But thanks for the tip. I have been living your described strategy successfully for years. This is my play money, which I like to use more risky.
•
99
•1Yr
@Isy1990 of course, but do not want to give the impression under zocktrades that would be investing. Everyone can do what he wants. Came perhaps n bit harder over than desired. Kind regards.
•
22
•
@Valid You can invest and you can trade. She did a great job with the latter here. You're right that you have to distinguish between the two, but I think it's crude to call trading a weak strategy. There are already a few who do this successfully in the long term. With quarterly figures or such events, I also like to go in with small money and leveraged. However, it is clear to me that it is not investing but trading and that it is considerably riskier than investing. But it is not stupid, because the return depends strongly on the risk and here more return is possible...
•
55
•
After all, everyone has some money to gamble. Congratulations
••
1Yr
@Chefkoch256 but the conditioning to it. The damage to the habit. To earn money through speculation, even in the short term, is of course good, but I see the damage in the long term behavior more negative than the profit, especially if it is marginal. Tempted it then but to gamble with larger sums. Can see each he wants.
••
@Valid they are two completely different things. if you are aware of that and the risk, i don't see anything wrong with it at all. If the strategy then also works, I don't understand what is fundamentally harmful about it. She recognized the possibility that the share could make a leap upwards, bet on it and then took decent profits in good time. In my eyes, this is not harmful behavior, but a super implemented strategy. It can also work in the long run in similar situations, even if there is no guarantee that it will always work out. And if you find that your strategy works, why not implement it with larger amounts? I only use the money I have already "earned" and because it has worked more often than not, the sum is currently getting larger. But I don't put it all on one story. With invest this has of course nothing to do, but it is here exclusively about trading.
•
33
•