The first is an ETF from Blackrock, the second from Xtrackers. One of the two from Xtrackers is accumulating, the other is distributing. That makes three different products, doesn't it?
•
11
•
@GreenWash That's right, that's why I wrote it down directly. Is there a reason why the iShares has a fee of 0.12% p.a. and the Xtrackers a fee of 0.3% p.a.?
Doesn't it make sense to simply invest in the iShares?
Doesn't it make sense to simply invest in the iShares?
••
@InvestRookie Yes, the TER of the iShares is cheaper. You could look at the tracking difference, e.g. for extra ETFs, because the xtTackers may still have the better performance.
There are simply different providers that track an index and then pay license fees, in this case to MSCI. And the different TER shows that this is good for competition.
There are simply different providers that track an index and then pay license fees, in this case to MSCI. And the different TER shows that this is good for competition.
•
11
•