2Mon
If you can cope with this blatant USA overweighting, you can do it that way, but it would be a bit too confusing for me. Best regards
••
2Mon
@Nevs1848 are only approx. 58% USA, 18 Asia, 18 EU. What would you choose then? Take out Nasdaq and raise eu+Asia to 15%?
••
2Mon
@Shaikun No, that's much more NASDAQ and S&P500 are already 100% together. Then FTSE another 60%.
I would invest like this:
FTSE - 55%
Stoxx 600 - 25%
MSCI India - 12%
BTCÐ - 8%
That's quite enough, you can also shift the percentages as required. But that's how I would do it and I'm also in the process of changing my portfolio more in this direction.
I would invest like this:
FTSE - 55%
Stoxx 600 - 25%
MSCI India - 12%
BTCÐ - 8%
That's quite enough, you can also shift the percentages as required. But that's how I would do it and I'm also in the process of changing my portfolio more in this direction.
••
2Mon
@Nevs1848 I think you miscalculated :-) FTSE is 60% USA. Sp500 100% that cancels out stoxx 100. We are back to 60% nasdaq and Asia cancels out. That leaves gold, which gives the total USA share as 58%. :-) This is also stated in the breakdowns in the test portfolio :-)
••
@Nevs1848 Have you ever experienced that the USA is gifted for a longer period of time and the rest of the world is not? I don't think I've even experienced it on a daily basis. What I'm saying is that if it sucks there, it sucks everywhere else. That's why I don't understand the panic about overweighting the USA. Take a look at any EuroStox ETF. Your feet will fall asleep. You'd be better off buying gold...
•
11
•2Mon
@Johann_van_der_Smut It's not always about the maximum return, because the risk here is also much higher. According to your answer, you could also invest 100% in the NASDAQ. You certainly don't do that yourself. Personally, I am also overweight in America because I simply like the companies. Nevertheless, the EuroStoxx is not to be sneezed at, as it also contains some great companies. Besides, you never regret a broad diversification.
••