Well, but since ESG is also the least stringent standard, Nestle is generally not wrong either. ESG does not claim that every company makes the world a better place. But as soon as oil, weapons, coal and co. are removed, one has already cleaned up a lot. I don't understand the criticism of being bothered by 0.6 percent Nestle now.
•
22
•
@WirecardCFO Weapons are also inside 🙃☺️
••
@leveragegrinding where, please? Well, I don't see anything from Boeing, Lockheed and co. If I've missed something, that may of course be the case. But I think that your criticism is exaggerated.
••
@WirecardCFO there are more weapons than just Lockheed Martin. Italian weapons manufacturers etc. are inside 🤷🏽♂️
••
@leveragegrinding This is simply not correct. There is no weapons manufacturer from Italy in the entire list. Please show the manufacturers that are supposed to be there
••
@leveragegrinding I find this regulars' criticism just so weak: Only grumbling because you found 0.3% somewhere in some more critical companies. The majority is filtered and thus achieves its purpose
••
@WirecardCFO you are right, was from another comment. Absolutely purposeful to buy the ETF.
••
@leveragegrinding I hear irony. But please check the facts first
••