The state always gets the taxes where it is easy: with the middle incomes To the really rich with their tax saving models they do not get and do not really want that ... The state cuts for years the pension benefits and pushes for private provision - that is so what of mendacious! If it was about private provision it would allow allowances and time lapses (in the past there was also the speculation period of one year). Finally, it belongs to the essence of the share provision that one must also shift times! I have paid this year 100k taxes as I am out of H2 and Tech, although I have invested it immediately again ... There must be better rules for asset management for old age! As long as people like Olaf see shares as something for rich people, this is of course not possible. Olaf is but the embodiment of old communist sentiments - who thinks so in today's modern financial world is a disgrace for his Mnisterium!
•
55
•
@GymTonic I see the same. Small investors are forced to invest in the capital market in order to improve their pensions, because insurance policies hardly yield anything for old age.... And then the tax-free amount is just under 800, which would have to be raised.
•
11
•Deleted User
3Yr
Comment was deleted
@Eochaid in principle I find buy and hold also good but I had bought a lot of H2 for pennies in the hope that they bring in 10 years times yield - then they have reeled off 10 years in a year ... so I had to go out to not go back to lot - with shares just buy and hold does not always go - there would be more investor-friendly tax guidelines very important ...
••
Deleted User
3Yr
Comment was deleted
@Eochaid Against the background that VermögensverwsltungsGmbHs of major shareholders pay only 5% tax on profits in the millions, there is plenty of room for generous tax allowances, e.g. 100k per year more than appropriate - actually more.
One could also regulate in such a way that the allowance is still much higher with new investment within the same year and only with total withdrawal 100% taxable. That would correspond to a classic taxable profit ... You could also regulate that you then zb in old age or because you want to make a purchase only taxed what you withdraw for life, that would be socially quite bearable!
And reintroduction of a speculation period of one year ( my Ballard , Plug et al. Profits would then have been tax-free ...) I would also find good A different treatment of crypto is not comprehensible - but that will change the highwaymen from the Ministry of Finance also still at the expense of investors ... Also the taxation according to the principle of 1st in is nonsense - I have my good shares always re-bought But if I take today LVMH , Adidas or Apple , I pay crazy taxes calculated on the first purchase amounts , which is especially with stagnation of the title not really saver-friendly ...
One could also regulate in such a way that the allowance is still much higher with new investment within the same year and only with total withdrawal 100% taxable. That would correspond to a classic taxable profit ... You could also regulate that you then zb in old age or because you want to make a purchase only taxed what you withdraw for life, that would be socially quite bearable!
And reintroduction of a speculation period of one year ( my Ballard , Plug et al. Profits would then have been tax-free ...) I would also find good A different treatment of crypto is not comprehensible - but that will change the highwaymen from the Ministry of Finance also still at the expense of investors ... Also the taxation according to the principle of 1st in is nonsense - I have my good shares always re-bought But if I take today LVMH , Adidas or Apple , I pay crazy taxes calculated on the first purchase amounts , which is especially with stagnation of the title not really saver-friendly ...
••
Deleted User
3Yr
Comment was deleted
@Eochaid There was one of my followers here, who has made nen blog, because he himself has founded one, must think about who that was... Is but so, just had no time to take care of it, but would certainly be worthwhile... Me scare off two things: practical handling, every trade to document and study times as the trading fees for companies look - but my Steuerberster said, would be worthwhile from nem profit of about. 20000 euros a year already worthwhile And imagine you can each trip to the shareholders meeting still deduct from the 5% tax, then I buy Las Vegas Sands 😂 Had somewhere nen screenshot of the blog, but am on vacation and do not find him ... 😭
••