4Mon·

On the subject of founder-managed companies and a performance comparison, I have only found the following certificate.

It includes family-run companies, but only from Europe.

The three largest positions are: $COLO B (-0.31%) , $EZJ (+2.38%) and $BC8 (+3.29%)


The performance clearly lags behind that of the Eurostoxx50! But I don't think that is representative enough.


But whether it is really an advantage that a company is run by its founder depends, I think, above all on the founder's vision and his openness to change.


@Tenbagger2024

attachment
1
6 Comments

profile image
Watch out! There may be a negative selection bias here.
You only see the founder-managed companies that have decided to float their equity on the stock market. Why would you voluntarily share your future profits with others and go through the regulatory hassle?
These are probably companies that needed capital at some point, but did not get reasonable conditions from the banks.
The better companies don't need an IPO and therefore don't appear in it 😉
6
View all 4 further answers
profile image
Yes, of course it's about stock corporations with founder participation.
I think there are still some good examples.
$SIX2

$FIE

Viessmann

https://www.finanzen.net/anlagetrends/familienunternehmen

Join the conversation