6Mon·

I was just wondering whether it would make more sense for me to use the MSCI World SRI ($SUSW (+1.39%)) it would make more sense for me to use the MSCI World ESG Screened ($SAWD (+1.42%)), as this does not exclude as many companies as the SRI.

It's a bit stupid when companies like Apple, Amazon, Google and the like are missing from your investment for whatever reason.


The ESG Screened is very close to the normal MSCI World, only at a lower share price and therefore not so much money remains in the clearing account for one-off purchases in between ;-)


The difference within the last year was also not entirely without...

4
32 Comments

profile image
Just as a thought experiment: how about an ordinary, inexpensive MSCI World?
21
View all 12 further answers
profile image
LU1781541179
$LCUW

A €16 MSCI World ETF with a very low TER and a large fund volume.

I also use this as a world ETF.

Should solve your problems 👍🏼
2
View all 3 further answers
But you do know that the TER tells you what the ETF costs you, right?
How many euros a share in an ETF costs is completely irrelevant
2
Show answer
I am very satisfied with the SRI. I also have the EM SRI.
2
profile image
Are there any companies in the ESG that you didn't want at all?
Just put them in relation to Apple, Google and the like.
1
View all 4 further answers
profile image
I understand your reasons and that's why I switched to ESG!
1
Show answer
profile image
Do you really want to have environmentally friendly screening, or is it just a coincidence?
View all 4 further answers

Join the conversation