profile image
Unilever, pepsico, archer Daniel's midlands I would sort out directly.

In the case of Unilever and pepsico, it is the issue of debt, which is simply too high for me.
With archer Daniel's midlands it's the performance.

For me, the consumer staples sector is unexciting anyway, only exciting for cash flow shareholders.
For me as a private investor and quality growth investor, I want to achieve the maximum return and dividends tend to be negative overall.

I haven't really familiarized myself with the other companies.
I like the balance sheet of Monster very much and it has also performed well, but the returns for the sector are clearly inferior compared to other companies.
profile image
@schokosahne Incidentally, 3m is also unexciting for me as an investor, they dance at every wedding and somehow at none of them properly.
You have to decide whether you want a conglomerate or not and the cancellation of the dividend was due to the debt.

Despite the spin-off of part of the company, there is still 44 billion in debt, that would be too hot for me and I would leave that to the big ones, you are lucky enough to invest in companies of your choice