A lot does not always necessarily help a lot... 🤣
••
@Metis What do you mean Metin?
••
@Steinicke Why another ETF?
A car doesn't get any cleaner if you use twice as much cleaning agent as recommended.
There are a lot of sector ETFs in your list. Once you reach a certain level, you no longer diversify with more ETFs, you just weight certain sectors or companies more heavily.
A car doesn't get any cleaner if you use twice as much cleaning agent as recommended.
There are a lot of sector ETFs in your list. Once you reach a certain level, you no longer diversify with more ETFs, you just weight certain sectors or companies more heavily.
••
@Metis 2 sector ETF. Global Clean Energy is so dead. We will realize partial gains in Digital Security. Seen in this light, there are not many sector ETFs. In my opinion, there is little overlap with Japan, Nordic and Korea.
••
@Steinicke And there is no China in the EM or why do you have China in there again?
Okay, long story short: I don't see any strategy or system in the selection. And without a system, you can't make a selection.
With the S&P500 and the EM, you actually cover a lot except for Europe.
Okay, long story short: I don't see any strategy or system in the selection. And without a system, you can't make a selection.
With the S&P500 and the EM, you actually cover a lot except for Europe.
••
@Metis You seriously ask why China? How dare you
••
@Shishi No. I asked why China separately on top of the EM ETF, too.
••
@Metis China is one of the biggest opportunities at the moment
•
11
•@Metis Metin , We have an overweight China ETF. At the time, my father also didn't know which cyber stock to include in his portfolio, so we bought Digital Security.
••
@Steinicke If you're already tagging me, then don't write my username incorrectly behind it again. 😅
So deliberate overweighting, now that's a statement.
So deliberate overweighting, now that's a statement.
••