1Yr·

Stock analysis $RIG


About one of these "excess return" clubs on the net came across the following free analysis:

https://smallcapsclub.de/kostenlose-analyse-transocean-ltd


How I find a VOM Aufbau HER successful example of how an investment theory can come about.


What do you think of the analysis?

I see some weak points (in terms of content), but I would like to know if you also find them...


Above all, I am interested in your opinions on this if you have time...


@InvestmentPapa
@TheAccountant89
@Lorena
@RoronoaZoro@CorruptedCaptain
@Gaylord
@SharkAce , Nico and @BASS-T


attachment
6
19 Comments

profile image
Too long for my taste, but that may be because it's not my area of interest (small caps). But the source list looks like from the 10th grade....
1
Show answer
profile image
Phew some spelling and grammar mistakes, and only got as far as 3.3, didn't feel like it after that - reads like a 4th grade story, way too few numbers and way too much blah blah. I read me later maybe bissel further through, certainly good to fall asleep
1
profile image
Unfortunately, I haven't had a chance to read through it yet. So much text 🥴 but at least a Swiss company. Whereby that could then be more complicated with the purchase
1
profile image
I'm still reading, just that as an intermediate status from me... 😅
1
profile image
Could definitely have been much shorter, but I think the intention behind the "analysis" is quite good - to shed light on a small title that many people won't have on their radar. But I miss a lot of numbers and also various other facts that other free analyses here on GQ contain. The content structure and the approach I find actually also very well done.
At the list of sources, however, has turned me the toenails up from the top of the socks up, that really hurt :D But the rest has given me that this small caps club 29.99 € per month requires to read the analysis :D All in all, I must say that I see Transocean quite as an interesting title after the analysis and definitely put me on the watchlist and will deal with it a little closer :)
1
View all 2 further answers
profile image
I have now read through to the finale. In part, I really had to read whole paragraphs twice or three times to understand what he means... on the whole, this kind of analysis reminds me of my contribution to Coloplast. For me, too, it is not always the pure presentation of key figures that matters at first. The journey is the destination in such analyses. How do I get, you mentioned it correctly, to my investment case. Technically, many things may have been correct here, but I thought to myself in between... "ok, he didn't write everything himself or didn't read it again, maybe copy&paste, because of duplication or any connections to statements that didn't occur before or were taken out of context. I also caught myself twice googling for text passages or searching in English, because I was speculating on a translation... Otherwise the brother has delivered, at least as far as TL;DR is concerned, he has successfully acquired the annual membership. At the end remains nevertheless somehow: For a Professional analyst appears to me too much "blabla" (with me this is not bad, because I am no professional and express only my opinion) and too little "à point". Also this Discord babble annoyed me in between. Was kind of like listening to someone talking to themselves... 😅 As for the company, no investment. Hope that's enough for you as an opinion. But thanks for linking. As written... also like to read through others opinions and kvetching besides my philosophy. 🙃
1
Show answer
profile image
The author has done a great job, with his track record, you can pber the individual errors be it the grammar or the "bla bla" ... I prefer to have a good case than to analyze the actual state of the balance - because that can be googled
1
Join the conversation