Paul (@PayPalPaul) on getquin

Paul

@PayPalPaul

4Wk·

Hello 🙋🏼‍♂️,

what is your opinion on this portfolio allocation?

or how would you weight the 3 in each case?

$SPPW (+1.2%)

$HMEF (+1.37%)

$n/a (+1.02%)

9 Comments

Banana M.@Banana_Millionaire

4Wk

World 70-90%
EM 10-30%
Europe unnecessary, as already represented in the World.

Personally, I would even go for 100% World.
Many companies generate their sales worldwide. I therefore consider weighting by region to be outdated.
But that's just my opinion.
Objectively speaking, the emerging markets should certainly not be neglected.

•

View all 2 further answers

Dividensenmann@Dividensenmann

4Wk

I do 80/20 Developed/Emerging as a middle ground between market cap and GDP weighting. Of the Developed only 70% in MSCI World and 10% in the Europe 600 I also find a good approach.
However, I wonder how you decided on these 3 ETFs. Aren't there any ETFs for all 3 indices that perform better after taking TER and TD into account?

••

View all 2 further answers

Alexander F.@Alex_DSZL95

4Wk

You can diversify here depending on your preference.

I would regard a 50-30-20 portfolio as a solid basis.
50 World, 30 Europe, 20 EM IMI

••

Phipsl@philippklmr

4Wk

I think that's good. However, you don't have any smaller companies (smallcaps) in it. I would therefore take an EM IMI ETF instead of the emerging markets ETF, and replace the Europe ETF with a Europe smallcap ETF

For example: $XXSC
Or even better: $ZPRX (Since value stocks generally perform better over the longer term (especially with small caps).

••

Show answer

Join the conversation