As long as you don't do any coaching like Madame Moneypenny kauft☝️ https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article237448411/Die-Netz-Checkerin-Wenn-die-feministische-Finanzberatung-mehr-als-ein-Monatsgehalt-kostet.html
•
99
•
@Der_Dividenden_Monteur In my opinion, such a thing belongs to be immediately wiped out, who can be paid 5,000 € for a ETF course in a group can only have been rocked too close to the wall as a child ...
•
33
•
@Der_Dividenden_Monteur Yes, actually I find that also quite expensive... especially for those who already have debts and to which the course is also partly directed... What I find a pity, because I really like their content. I find you get everything you need for free with her, without being dependent on the course.
•
22
•
What?! Who pays so much money for a course?! Ask me what is told there? The matter is really not that difficult. There are rip-offs on every corner!
••
@GordonGekko83 In principle, I can understand the need for "guidance" and "course", if you do not know so at all - possibly also a more personal coaching. But now really not for the price (in my opinion). The setup was definitely exhausting at times, but it is and remains a group course and this will be repeated. I also think it is a lot of money for it. Everything up to 1000€ I could still understand - depending on personality level and content also more or even less.
••
@DieFinanzchaotin Okay, that may be that some need it. But the most important thing is to start investing actively. There no blah-blah brings something. It is the same with the realization of losses. Some do not dare to do that and wait until the position is back in the plus, which may not happen at all. Most of the things you learn in practice. That was and will always be the case.
••
@DieFinanzchaotin Ufff, that's really intense. Heard a lot about her, but that the courses are brought for so much coal among the women is new to me. I would be interested to know how high the proportion of women in such courses is? Probably 95%, 95% who want to be taken by the hand to go through the stock market jungle, because they themselves do not trust it, have self-doubt and generally think that the stock market is more a man's thing. In my environment, I know no woman who has anything to do with the stock market, and if I'm honest, was also pretty beaten by the input in the beginning, because you could not see the forest for the trees. But I would never have come up with the idea to take such a course and then even for so much 💸!
•
11
•@GordonGekko83 Yes, I agree that you are absolutely right and I am also rather "a doer" and just try. But that's not everyone and many (especially women) dare to do so only after instruction. Therefore, I simply do not condemn anyone who needs such a course as a start. But just up to a certain price.@FrauManu Of course, the share of women in the course is 100%... is specifically for women. I think generally there is also the better earnings, because women as you say, there not quite so self-confident and cautious go there. That you can make more money than with men is absolutely clear and not so stupid. But as I said - for so much I find it also hefty (and yes, I knew before that it is actually quite expensive). In itself, I find courses as support for complete beginners, which are well and structured, with individual touch, also not so bad.
••
@Der_Dividenden_Monteur
I would be interested to know if the ladies of society actually want/need special advice, perhaps simply feel more comfortable when women instead of men consult them.
I would be interested to know if the ladies of society actually want/need special advice, perhaps simply feel more comfortable when women instead of men consult them.
••
@Qheherain Do not really need, but feel more comfortable, because many women have even less willingness to take risks and self-confidence than some men (Of course, there are exceptions). What do you mean when women instead of men consult?
••